Thread: [Photo Feature]: Firefox Bicycles
View Single Post
Old 10-25-2008, 03:33 PM   #30 (permalink)
synergizer
Senior Member
 
synergizer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 308
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ARTificialindulgence View Post
well, m divided on this one!!! i would go for the trek, considering the components, i would go for the firefox viper, considering the frame geometry. if both of these could be mix bred , nuthing like it ( for the price)

the trek has got a very 'entry level' look, where as the viper has got a better looking and technologically advanced frame ( the downtube is hydroformed 7000 series aluminum)
its got a very low standover height, so the chances of your nether regions hitting the toptube is much lesser as compared to the trek.

the trek has better components, than the viper. the front suspension on the viper is worse than anything i've ever ridden. its got 2 inches of sticky mucky travel. if m not mistaken, the trek comes equipped with RST forks . which is quite decent. even the drivetrain is better on the trek.

if i had the choice, i would go for the viper, and upgrade it to better components, thats what i've done with my viper! all of the stock parts are lying somewhere someplace in my house, the frame however has got 'manitou stance' front forks, 'shimano' cranksets and bottom bracket. cnc machined stem and 1.5 inch riser bars by 'powertools' and the works !

bottom line, i llllllllovvve the viper frame!!
woww.. thats a lot of download.. thanks for the info dude... so are u a professional cyclist...???
synergizer is offline   Reply With Quote