Thread: SBK Workshop
View Single Post
Old 11-27-2008, 01:47 PM   #29 (permalink)
Old Fox
Senior Member
 
Old Fox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Noida
Posts: 669
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rossiter View Post
Crisp and clear writeup. Good work Ken..

And I did get a chance to try out the cat-con-less R1. It has a drastic effect on the heat in traffic, and the buildup in the temp gauge is a lot more slower. The frame still heats up as much as before though.

Notable side-effects include, faster than before jump to the shift light indicator, and a meaner exhaust note at idle.
^ That's interesting, something I'd wanted to try too. The cat-con I guess is in the root of the 'Y' splitter pipe section. Another guess: its an interference fit so removal is the hard way - hammering. The honeycomb can probably be drilled out easily but the sleeve would need an arbor and a mallet.

Nice to know about the reduced heat build-up. Seems relevant though as the gas flows out freer now. Wonder if the drastically reduced back-pressure is accommodated well within the envelope of the ECU. The lambda readings would be quite different without the cat-con.

The frame heating is the result of direct heat transfer from the engine body so I don't think it will be any different with/without the cat-con.

And now that it (the cat-con) is out for good, will sure like to give the un-constipated '1 a try when we get there on the trip.

Keep us posted on anything unusual post c-c removal.
__________________
I don't let my motorcycles interfere with my motorcycling...

Join xBhp On

Old Fox is offline   Reply With Quote