xBhp.com : The Global Indian Biking Community - View Single Post

yelloos · 03-14-2010, 10:41 AM

Pulsar 135 vs CBF Stunner and Unicorn

See the comparison b/w p135 and stunner yourself.
I'll tell u in short their comparison -
Stunner is better in every field than p135 except two things
1. It vibrates after a speed of 60kmph.(The carburetted version of stunner is extremely under geared.) P135 doesn't.
2. It is costlier than p135.

Stunner is more comfortable, better in looks, gives better mileage than p135.

Now, it's upto you to choose, if you drive at a speed >60 mostly, i.e. on highways and can't tolerate vibrations then go for p135, o/w stunner is the best bet.

PS: Stunner here means the carburetted version not the pgm-fi one.
pgm-fi doesn't vibrate at higher speeds.

03-14-2010, 10:41 AM	#39 (permalink)
yelloos Junior Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Delhi Posts: 21	Pulsar 135 vs CBF Stunner and Unicorn See the comparison b/w p135 and stunner yourself. I'll tell u in short their comparison - Stunner is better in every field than p135 except two things 1. It vibrates after a speed of 60kmph.(The carburetted version of stunner is extremely under geared.) P135 doesn't. 2. It is costlier than p135. Stunner is more comfortable, better in looks, gives better mileage than p135. Now, it's upto you to choose, if you drive at a speed >60 mostly, i.e. on highways and can't tolerate vibrations then go for p135, o/w stunner is the best bet. PS: Stunner here means the carburetted version not the pgm-fi one. pgm-fi doesn't vibrate at higher speeds.