Quote:
Originally Posted by payeng
It means the same thing. " more reliable" than what..?? Duh..!!
You obviously.
Unless its Moose who's trying to find out "who"?
At least you accept that till now there has been no issues..!! 
Like I have said, I have lived with the bike for 2 weeks. Its better than not having sat on it and still act an "expert" on it.
By the way, the Pulsar 135LS was launched last Dec, so in July 2010, it makes around 7 months have passed since its launch.
So by the "1 year standard", the P135LS should receive the certificate of a "reliable" bike after 5 more months..!!
5 months is not too much to wait for. Come on P135LS.. you can do it..!! Ha Ha ha.
|
Absolute incorrect argument. Re-read my comment.
I wrote, about performance in both the bike's suggestion. Did you find me saying P135 is unreliable, No, I said pulsar's engine are notorious i.e. Pulsar brand has been notorious for having non -reliable engine. If you want me to change my judgment just because you find your 2 week old Pulsar 135 is doing great, i am sorry that doesn't change my opinion because pulsar as a brand has 3 more variants keeping P135 aside.
Toughness, Yamaha's are known for tough engine. Pulsar engines on the other hand are not, granted P135 is has a altogether a new engine but still, i will believe it when i see the long term review not 2 week preview.
BTW, likewise there are many ways to nit pick, we are just here to help a buddy to select a bike. You like your p135 ?, cool. I don't have problem with it. Like i said in my suggestion. If he is looking for good resell value, performance and mileage P135 is nice vehicle to get. PERIOD.