Quote:
Originally Posted by jigar2speed
Absolute incorrect argument. Re-read my comment.
I wrote, about performance in both the bike's suggestion. Did you find me saying P135 is unreliable, No, I said pulsar's engine are notorious i.e. Pulsar brand has been notorious for having non -reliable engine. If you want me to change my judgment just because you find your 2 week old Pulsar 135 is doing great, i am sorry that doesn't change my opinion because pulsar as a brand has 3 more variants keeping P135 aside.
Toughness, Yamaha's are known for tough engine. Pulsar engines on the other hand are not, granted P135 is has a altogether a new engine but still, i will believe it when i see the long term review not 2 week preview.
BTW, likewise there are many ways to nit pick, we are just here to help a buddy to select a bike. You like your p135 ?, cool. I don't have problem with it. Like i said in my suggestion. If he is looking for good resell value, performance and mileage P135 is nice vehicle to get. PERIOD.
|
+1. Well said. People do not read posts properly and just jump to conclusions. I still do not understand their logic of how they prove the
long-term reliability in just 5-6 months. If somebody says Bajaj's egines are not durable in long term, they cannot digest it because they blindly love Bajaj (I am sure they know the Bajaj's history).