Since '02 xBhp is different things to different people. From a close knit national community of bikers to India's only motorcycling lifestyle magazine and a place to make like-minded biker friends. Join us

#xBhpAxorHelmet #2

Axor
Castrol Power 1

Dawn & dusk make slight hard to adjust.

Our Partners

User Tag List

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 36

Thread: RTR 160/Pulsar 135LS/Others

  1. #21
    Rusted payeng's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3,231
    Mentioned
    37 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nimma View Post
    Ok so i tried out both the bikes as well as the Pulsar 150 cc......Between the 135/150cc Pulsar i found the throttle experience to be different...

    The 150cc Pulsar's throttle felt a bit better than the 135cc's.....

    I have ruled out the Apache now purely because of the tires......I have heard people complaining about the TVS tires and i simply do not want to risk it.........

    Now i have to make the choice between the 135 and the 150 cc Pulsars.....Please let me know your inputs to help me make a decision.......

    P.S : The guy at the showroom said the top speed for both the Pulsar's is 115...Is that true??......

    The throttle response between the Pulsar 150 and Pulsar 135 is different. The Pulsar 150 will have better grunt at low engine revs.. making lifting heavy load or a heavy pillion easy.

    The Pulsar 135 develops it peak power at high engine revs, and thanks to its 4 valve engine, the Pulsar 135 feels more powerful at higher engine revs.. it's engine is tuned to deliver performance like a "sports" bike.

    After spending a week with my friends P135, I can say that the Pulsar 135 can do top speeds of around 115 kmph. Haven't ridden the 2010 P150.. but with the power increased to 15 Ps, it should also do around 115 kmph despite having most of its grunt at lower engine revs.


    The Apache RTR 160 is a great bike. You can always replace the tyres..



    Last edited by payeng; 02-21-2010 at 09:46 PM.

  2. #22
    Rookie joyjeetdan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Bangalore, Kolkata
    Posts
    45
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nimma View Post
    I have ruled out the Apache now purely because of the tires......I have heard people complaining about the TVS tires and i simply do not want to risk it.........
    @nimma: Sorry but I can't agree with this fact. Only because of tires I don't think anyone should rule out apache from their list. I am driving it from more than 1 year now with stock tyres, and about grip I have to say that it's bit slippery on wet roads. Which you can rectify also. I am using a bit more air pressure on my both tubes. now it gives much better grip than previously. Now about the bike here are some points which u can't ignore

    Displacement: 159.7cc
    Maximum Power: 11.5 KW @8500 rpm [15.7 bhp]
    Maximum Torque: 13.1 Nm @ 6500 rpm
    Fuel Tank: 16.00 ltrs

    Don't forget about Dual Disk option

    Bajaj 150 DTSi (2010 model)

    Displacement: 149.01cc
    Maximum Power: 10.37 KW (14.09 PS) @ 8500 RPM
    Maximal Torque: 12.76 N-m @ 6500 RPM
    Fuel Tank: 15.00 ltrs

    Bajaj 135LS

    Displacement: 134.66 cc.
    Maximum Power: 13.3 Bhp(9.9 kW) @ 9000 rpm
    Maximum Torque: 11.4 Nm @ 7500 rpm
    Fuel Tank 8.00 ltrs

    I don't think there is a match between pulser 135 and apache. the only thing i like about the 135 LS is the number plate mount nothing else.

    Anyway this proves another fact that apache is above all............
    The Cradle Rocks Above An Abyss, & Common Sense Tells Us That Our Existence is But a Brief Crack of Light Between 2 Eternities of Darkness...............

  3. #23
    Rookie nimma's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    20
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Well its actually quite frustrating for me to be honest that i am taking this long to make a decision.....

    Yes Apache is very good....maybe i am exaggerating regarding the grip....but its just that my friend specifically told me that he has had problems and suggested me to look elsewhere.....

    Its so difficult to make a decision.....

  4. #24
    Yamaddicted soumya_digi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Bengaluru
    Posts
    214
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Have a test ride. Apache is far better than Pulsar 135 LS. The noisy suspension of P135 is irritating!! And many friends have many problems. Just choose a machine with which you are comfortable.

    Yamaha FZ25 Top Speed Video [GPS + Speedo]

    ⨌⨀_⨀⨌


    Horsepower was a lot safer when only the horse had it!!

  5. #25
    Addicted YoungBoy_220's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    West Bengal
    Posts
    85
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I don't understand why you people are comparing a 135cc machine with a 160cc. Both P135LS and Apache are good in their own segments and there is no point in comparing them. Btw, there can be a comparison between Apache and P150.

    I agree with you soumya_digi, one should test ride all the bikes that he has in his like-list and choose the one with which he is most comfortable.
    Btw, I got the noisy suspension problem on my P135LS corrected at the SVC.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  6. #26
    Rusted happybiking's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    JH->OR->AP->MH->KA...
    Posts
    566
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by YoungBoy_220 View Post
    ... Btw, there can be a comparison between Apache and P150...
    ...I just love this!!!

    @threadstarter : I have P150,FZ & RTR160 in my room. And trust me if its about power RTR is the one(be it accelaration or top-speed). About tires : Well, My bike is 30k kms old and am still on stock(strange eh!!!)...lately its showing problems and they are due for change though. I have done enough of ghats,mountains and seas around different states and trust me they ain't that bad(that you reject a bike). Its more about you getting accustomed to it. Initially(for a couple of weeks), I faced probs but then I knew what should be the pressure to apply on brakes at different speeds.

    So, I would suggest you have a test ride and please at 23 trust your own instincts!!!

  7. #27
    Rookie joyjeetdan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Bangalore, Kolkata
    Posts
    45
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by YoungBoy_220 View Post
    I don't understand why you people are comparing a 135cc machine with a 160cc. Both P135LS and Apache are good in their own segments and there is no point in comparing them. Btw, there can be a comparison between Apache and P150.

    I agree with you soumya_digi, one should test ride all the bikes that he has in his like-list and choose the one with which he is most comfortable.
    Btw, I got the noisy suspension problem on my P135LS corrected at the SVC.
    I compared them because this 3 bikes are in his radar.... So I just wanted to show which gives what....No other intension....

    +1 to soumya_digi, the best way is take a test drive and decide....
    The Cradle Rocks Above An Abyss, & Common Sense Tells Us That Our Existence is But a Brief Crack of Light Between 2 Eternities of Darkness...............

  8. #28
    Rusted payeng's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3,231
    Mentioned
    37 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by joyjeetdan View Post
    @nimma: Sorry but I can't agree with this fact. Only because of tires I don't think anyone should rule out apache from their list. I am driving it from more than 1 year now with stock tyres, and about grip I have to say that it's bit slippery on wet roads. Which you can rectify also. I am using a bit more air pressure on my both tubes. now it gives much better grip than previously. Now about the bike here are some points which u can't ignore

    Displacement: 159.7cc
    Maximum Power: 11.5 KW @8500 rpm [15.7 bhp]
    Maximum Torque: 13.1 Nm @ 6500 rpm
    Fuel Tank: 16.00 ltrs

    Don't forget about Dual Disk option


    Correction:
    Bajaj 150 DTSi (2010 model)

    Displacement: 149.01cc

    Older Figure: Maximum Power: 10.37 KW (14.09 PS) @ 8500 RPM

    Old Figure: Max Torque: 12.76 N-m @ 6500 RPM

    Fuel Tank: 15.00 ltrs

    Bajaj 135LS

    Displacement: 134.66 cc.
    Maximum Power: 13.3 Bhp(9.9 kW) @ 9000 rpm
    Maximum Torque: 11.4 Nm @ 7500 rpm
    Fuel Tank 8.00 ltrs

    I don't think there is a match between pulser 135 and apache. the only thing i like about the 135 LS is the number plate mount nothing else.

    Anyway this proves another fact that apache is above all............


    Updated Power - Torque figures of the 2010 Pulsar 150:

    Power: 15.06 Ps @ 9000 rpm
    Torque: 12.5 Nm @ 6500 rpm



    Last edited by payeng; 02-22-2010 at 03:45 PM.

  9. #29
    Rookie joyjeetdan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Bangalore, Kolkata
    Posts
    45
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by payeng View Post
    Updated Power - Torque figures of the 2010 Pulsar 150:

    Power: 15.06 Ps @ 9000 rpm
    Torque: 12.5 Nm @ 6500 rpm


    my mistake.....Sorry folks
    The Cradle Rocks Above An Abyss, & Common Sense Tells Us That Our Existence is But a Brief Crack of Light Between 2 Eternities of Darkness...............

  10. #30
    Addicted Uttam Gala's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Kemps Corner, Mumbai
    Posts
    198
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Exclamation The choice is SIMPLE.

    Bro go in for the RTR 160 FI.

    I'll explain why:
    1) You say you want good fuel economy, so the 180 isn't an option.
    2) Pulsar 135LS... Are you SERIOUS? Mate i've seen a lot of comparisons but this is a downright insult to the RTR. Raw power is raw power. Nothing comes close to it. The Pulsar 135 LS maybe a decent bike for it's capacity, but PLEASE, for the love of god do not compare it on performance basis with the Apache.
    3) IMHO, the one and ONLY plus point about the baby pulsar is (im assuming) fuel economy will be marginally higher.
    4) The tires? Mate do you realize you're spending ~ 70-75 grand. The rear tire costs abouts 1200 bucks! Firstly the stock tires even if not out of the world, are decent enough.
    5) The Pulsar 150 is a proven machine over the years but anyone will agree here, the RTR 160 FI kicks butt!
    6) Looks. Yes, i reckon 99% of people will say RTR looks way better.
    7) Just look at the difference! With an Apache you'll have a rear disk brake (which IMHO is a very, very important factor). Everyone knows it's braking ability the best in its class.

    Overall, my friend i don't mean to be harsh but there's really no question about which bike is better in terms of performance, safety, looks and sheer class. Having second thoughts about this is foolishness. If you can afford it, the choice is simple.

    I know how it feels, you are paying good money and you want to be sure before you invest in one of these but after this post i really doubt you should be confused.

    Good luck and whatever you decide on, remember - never regret your choice.

    Cheers buddy.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    What lies behind us and what lies beyond us are small matters when compared to what lies within us.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 234
    Last Post: 02-27-2014, 03:18 AM
  2. [Photo Feature]: Pulsar Mania - My pulsar REDEFINED.
    By vr2131 in forum General Biking Discussion
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 06-16-2012, 03:14 PM
  3. RTR 160 or Pulsar 135ls
    By debayan in forum What Bike?
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 01-05-2010, 11:46 PM
  4. Confused between Pulsar 200 (present) and New Pulsar 200
    By himanshu2727 in forum What Bike?
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-07-2009, 10:58 AM
  5. Confused between Pulsar 200 (present) and New Pulsar 200
    By himanshu2727 in forum What Bike?
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-06-2009, 09:44 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •