I am planning to buy a first bike and am confused on which one to buy. I went through the ownership thread of many bikes and found that each bike has it's own advantages and disadvantages.
My experience with bikes is very limited. Have rode my cousin's RX 135 quite a few times, apart from that, it's almost nil.
I test rode the apache and the gs, apache was very powerful and suzuki was super smooth. Now, I am confused as to what is more important.
1. How bad are the vibes in RTR 180, compared to say a pulsar? I don't want to compare it with that of a unicorn or a GS cos I know they are very silent. If it's better or comparable to pulsar's, I can live with it.
2. Isn't the suzuki a bit heavy and underpowered? And have the rusting issues been taken care of? If not I am ditching the GS.
I have considered the rtr 180 coz it comes with tubeless tyres and a rear disc which is a good addition over the 160. Am I falling into some kinda marketing trap here?
Also, how is the Pulsar 220 sports edition? I don't like the one with fairing.
My budget is around 75k.
Please let me know your suggestions.



by more than 1k if I still remember it correctly. And in performance mainly pickup and top speed RTR 180 beats FZ hands down.

Comment