im planning on buyin the r1. im a little worried bout the heating issues.. i would not want to ve myself fried on long drives. but then again i dont ve a choice. with the budget of 8lak i guess r1 is the only legal bike i can get in tis country.
(CORRECT ME IF IM WRONG) so i want to kick out the debate which is running on every r1 rider'S MIND
... WHICH R1 IS BETTER THE 2008 R1 OR THE 2009 R1 WITH THE ADVANCED CROSS PLANE CRANK (WHICH RELEASED IN 2010 IN INDIA)
many detest the looks of the new r1. many say the new r1 looks absolutely fine and performs perfect.. but what bout the probs which the prev model had?? have they really been rectified??? is the new r1 just a face lift of the old r1 with some motogp crank??? or is it really a bike which could scare the other mortals out of its league?? is the new r1 really a bike worth going for or has it just given up to evolve into a better bike?




Stable enough to be ridden hard at all speeds and around corners. 





Comment