Since '02 xBhp is different things to different people. From a close knit national community of bikers to India's only motorcycling lifestyle magazine and a place to make like-minded biker friends. Join us

Castrol Power 1

Practice slow-speed riding.

Our Partner

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

TVS Apache RR 310 Review

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • TVS Apache RR 310 Review

    The TVS Apache RR 310, which was known as the Akula 310 in its pre-production/ concept avatar, was the most awaited motorcycle of the year and boy did it live up to the expectations when it was finally launched by TVS in Chennai? Gauging by the people’s response on the internet, you can definitely say that TVS seems to have hit the nail on its head with the Apache RR 310. We received hundreds of comments on our live video from the launch and not even a single one of them seemed to dislike the bike. Take a bow TVS!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1857.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	94.8 KB
ID:	2000849

    The Apache RR 310 is probably one of the best motorcycle designs by an Indian manufacturer. The design is sharp and edgy, not too sharp like the RC390 though. This design has been finalized after extensive wind tunnel testing of various prototypes and offers lowest coefficient of drag in its segment. They’ve also incorporated vents in the side fairing to deflect the hot air coming from the engine and the radiator away from the rider. And it does look and feel big, much bigger than you would expect an entry level sports bike to be. The Bi-LED twin projector headlamp, minimalistic sticker work, and a sharp tail give this bike a very distinctive and pronounced road presence that is hard to miss.

    Here's a small walkaround live video we did from the launch








    The Apache 310 RR is available in two color variants – Racing Red and Sinister Black. The glossy red paint with white race stripes keeps reminding you of Ducati; and the matte black variant, although subtle, holds its ground well. The paint and fit and finish on this bike is top notch and it reeks of the kind of premiumness you’d expect from much more expensive European bikes.















    The vertically stacked, fully digital console is a completely new concept to the Indian market and it takes a little while to get used to it; however, it stops feeling odd after spending a few minutes sitting on the bike. And it gives you 18 different tell-tale signs, including but not limited to lap timing, gear shift indicator, trip meter, fuel gauge, engine temperature, etc.



    The Apache RR 310 is the first motorcycle from the BMW-TVS partnership to hit the Indian market and at the heart of it sits the 312.2 cc single cylinder, liquid cooled, reverse inclined engine jointly developed by both these manufacturers. The same engine is used by BMW on their G 310 R and the G 310 GS motorcycles. But the similarity between the TVS and BMW products ends right there. TVS has developed its own ECU to control the engine and says it is tweaked to provide better fueling and acceleration. This engine is mated to a 6-speed gearbox and produces 34 PS at 9700 RPM and a peak torque of 27.5 Nm at 7700 RPM. The reverse inclined orientation of the engine aids in better mass centralization of the bike as well as gives the engineers the liberty to increase the length of the swing arm with a shorter wheelbase.



    Riding stance on this bike is neither too aggressive nor too commuterish. TVS engineers have managed to find a perfect balance between these two extremes and the rider sits pretty comfortably. And then there’s enough room even for taller riders to go for a full tuck to minimize the effect of wind while attempting top speed runs. The seat height of 810 mm makes it pretty approachable even for not-too-tall riders like me. I am 5 feet 5 inches tall and had both my feet comfortably touching the ground while sitting on the bike. The seat is also quite roomy and comfortable and I don’t think people with a generous posterior would find it cramped either.



    Now comes the question how does it ride? The engine comes to life rather effortlessly with a slight press of the thumb starter and the engine settles to idling rpm. The throttle response is crisp but the exhaust note leaves a lot to be desired. The 6-speed gearbox is smooth and the gearshifts are reassuring without any false neutrals or clunkiness. The clutch lever is also smooth. Shift into first gear and the bike responds with the slightest movement of the right wrist. The engine is smooth and the power delivery is linear without any apparent troughs or peaks and the 310 pulls all the way until it reaches the very end of the rev range where it also develops mild but noticeable vibrations. TVS claims that they managed to achieve a top speed of 163 kmph on this bike, which we couldn’t verify ourselves but on the straights of the MMRT, we managed to get it well past 130 kmph mark with a lot of juice left in the engine. This bike should be able to do 120s-130s comfortably all day long without any signs of stress. The trellis frame chassis and the 41 mm USD suspension upfront and the rear monoshock (both developed by KYB in close association with TVS) work perfectly in tandem to keep the RR planted even when pushed hard and thrown around. The bike behaves like an obedient kid and does exactly what you want it to do. It is easily flickable and maneuverable and forgiving to quite an extent. Michelin Street Sport tyres (150/60 rear and 110/70 front) are a value addition and complement this overall package, helping you push your boundaries safely. The job of braking is well taken care of by dual channel ABS, 300 mm petal disk at the front and 240 mm petal disk at the rear. The bite by the brakes felt progressive and confidence inspiring.








    Here's how it performs against competition
    Click image for larger version

Name:	ktm.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	106.9 KB
ID:	2000851







    Click image for larger version

Name:	Apache RR310 Spec (1).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	112.4 KB
ID:	2000850
    TVS Apache RR 310 tech spec

    To summarize, the TVS Apache RR 310 is one stunning motorcycle that ticks all the right boxes no matter how you judge it. The design and overall styling looks fresh and it has got tons of oomph factor in it. It is a very capable daily commute motorcycle that will be attracting a lot of eyeballs on your Sunday rides and would be fun to ride on a race track as well. It is not an out-and-out racing tool per se but it has just the right mix of everything. All the goodies like dual channel ABS, FI, bi-LED twin projector headlamps, Michelin tyres, USD forks at a price tag of INR 2.05 lakh makes it an even more irresistible motorcycle to own and a complete value for money product. TVS has put their 35 years of racing experience in making this motorcycle and developed this product working closely with professional racers from their racing team. And it shows in the product that they’ve finally launched in the market. It comes as a perfect option for someone looking to buy an entry level sports motorcycle without having to sell their kidney and it looks destined to lead the Indian sports bike market for some time to come. It is such a proud feeling to see a world class product coming from an Indian manufacturer. We had a smile on our face for whatever little time we spent with it, though we would definitely want to take it a for a longer ride to see how it performs in real world riding conditions.
    Last edited by sunilg; 12-09-2017, 07:27 PM.
    (Been There Done That) x 3.25

  • #2
    Re: TVS Apache RR 310 Review

    Seems like tvs really nailed it this time!!.. its not easy for a manufacturer to develop a motorcycle which offers best of both worlds!! (On & off track experience) kudos to Tvs🙌

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: TVS Apache RR 310 Review

      I believe this will be a class leader soon. Sort of like how the Pulsar pretty much carved out a niche for itself in the 150cc - 220 cc range that no one could come close to. The only competition I can think of for the RR 310 are bikes with significantly bigger displacement engines of possibly lower quality and tacky design to offset the price a little bit.

      Design:
      I would gladly pay 2.2L for this thing just for the design, premium quality, fit and finish. The design is great. Every bit. It isn't overdone. I don't mean to be disrespectful to Pulsar owners (I was one myself), but the Pulsar RS in my opinion is over done. There's just too much going on in the front fairing - too many stickers and lines and sharp arrows. The design isn't focused and elegant in my opinion.

      Quality:
      The only other motorcycle made in India that come close to this on the parts-quality front seem to be the RE Twins. (at least by the first look)

      I really don't care if the competition brings in a 400 - 500 cc motorcycle faster than this for a lower price. I'd still pick this over those. At the end of the day, those will still be bigger bikes "competing" and "winning" against a much smaller bike. To me, this bike is a winner (IDK about the race track, but for the value it offers, I think TVS has a winner here).

      ----consecutive posts auto-merged-----

      Is it just me, or is there anyone else who thinks that the Benelli 302's body work is made out from sheet metal from Heineken beer cans. (the colors match almost exactly)
      Last edited by tirebuster; 12-09-2017, 01:27 AM.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: TVS Apache RR 310 Review

        I think this bike will be a game changer for TVS. However i feel that those alloy wheels sticks out like a sore thumb they don't go well with the looks of the bike.
        Last edited by sai ram; 12-09-2017, 06:50 PM.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: TVS Apache RR 310 Review

          The only thing missing is claimed FE which I was unable to find at the website as well as the showroom guys were unaware.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: TVS Apache RR 310 Review

            Originally posted by revvharder View Post
            The only thing missing is claimed FE which I was unable to find at the website as well as the showroom guys were unaware.
            FE is claimed to be between 30-35 kmpl as per the reviews seen elsewhere

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: TVS Apache RR 310 Review

              Nice short review, though we are waiting for a full fledged review soon. I hope TVS starts delivery within 2 months rather than making people wait like RTR200 and eventually loosing the hyped period sales. The more quickly You sale in first lot and make the bike visible on streets, will always give you that advantage (and free advertising aswell).
              HH Dawn - TVS Star City - Yamaha Gladiator - TVS RTR 180 - Honda CBR 250R - Yamaha R3

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: TVS Apache RR 310 Review

                Absolutely gorgeous and class-leading. There's just one thing though......and it's not the absence of slipper clutch or switchable ABS because it does not matter, but what does is the 11-lire fuel tank capacity, especially for people like me with a preference for sports tourer on a budget! and of course lazy to stop every 270 km!! (factoring in the 2-litre reserve required to keep alive the fuel pump)
                [MENTION=7123]sunilg[/MENTION] Another aspect which none of the websites have confirmed is the fuel tank....whether it's plastic or metal. It does look like rounded plastic over a geometric metal fuel tank, but it would be great and helpful indeed if you can confirm. Spoiled by magnetic tank bags....apologies.
                Current: Hero Karizma ZMR || Royal Enfield Bullet CI
                Past: Yamaha Enticer


                Ride hard or stay home!!

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: TVS Apache RR 310 Review

                  Nice review!
                  Although the instrument console looks a little on the smaller side, it's not a deal breaker. A brilliant proposition with a very good pricing!
                  A bike on the road is worth two in the shed.

                  Weekend Rides Around Kolkata
                  My Ride To Sunderbans -
                  Hemnagar & Samsernagar
                  Saagar Kinare - Bakkhali Calling

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: TVS Apache RR 310 Review

                    Most highlighting factors for me would be, Quality, fit & finish and innovations.
                    Paying 2.25L on road is a great value for money. i see in internet they compare with RC390 and say not a great VFM, but they forgot the quality , fit & finish which comes with price.


                    <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< START WIDE AND FINISH TIGHT >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

                    TVS Apache RR 310 : 2018
                    Hero Honda HUNK : 2011-2018

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: TVS Apache RR 310 Review

                      Originally posted by sambit View Post
                      Nice short review, though we are waiting for a full fledged review soon. I hope TVS starts delivery within 2 months rather than making people wait like RTR200 and eventually loosing the hyped period sales. The more quickly You sale in first lot and make the bike visible on streets, will always give you that advantage (and free advertising aswell).
                      ... Really, TVS should not let People wait as it made for RTR2004v.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: TVS Apache RR 310 Review

                        too early to say about FE but bike seem classy in terms of look and specification
                        TVS is working hard to develop good machine but their last production RTR 200 has still many issues

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: TVS Apache RR 310 Review

                          I'm not sure if I can compare motorcycles. But I'll do it because this seems to a raging debate online these days.


                          Here's my take on KTM RC390 Vs. TVS RR310

                          I see people talking about RC 390 being better. There's 2 things I'd like to clarify here:

                          1. The RR310's build quality is at par with BMW 310s and has absolutely nothing to do with past TVS products, except the "Apache" trademark. It is extremely ignorant to write this motorcycle off on the quality front by comparing it to even foreign-made motorcycles, let alone a lowly, humble rtr 200. And yes., when you compare this to a Duke/RC, the rr310 totally beats the KTMs on quality, fit and finish and does so by a big margin. I have seen both the motorcycles (RR310 and KTM) and the quality of materials, workmanship and parts are all far superior on the 310 RR. Every little seam, nut and crimp on the rr310 is extremely well finished, even minor details are well designed and there's been absolutely no cutting corners on any level. I went in to the showroom with mediocre expectations - and the thing that caught my eye immediately, more than the styling, was the quality. I remember thinking to myself "My God, this cannot be India-made".. it was as good as the best european motorcycles.
                          2. To compare the price and Brake Horse Power (or PS) is a very shallow way to think of a motorcycle. So the argument goes that since the RR-310 is only 310cc, 34hp @2.45 Lacs on road, and the RC-390 is 375cc, 43hp @2.65 Lacs on road, the RC 390 offers a better value on a rupee-to-horsepower basis. No one disagrees with the numbers. The real purpose of horse power is to see how it translates to speed on these motorcycles, and on that front, the top end speed of the RC 390 is about 7 KMPH more than the Apache rr310. This is despite the fact that the RC's engine produces a massive 9hp more than the rr310 (as claimed by KTM). I think with a 9hp "advantage" the RC should go about 15 to 20 kmph faster than the TVS. But then again, the way power is delivered from the engine to the wheels across the entire rev range matters. From the 0-60 figures and the top speed of 160 kmph (claimed by TVS), the RR 310 definitely seems to be doing this much better than the bigger displacement RC 390. At the low end, the RR will accelerate faster than an RC390. (Advantage RR on turns & twisty circuits) In a long straight stretch, the RR310 will top out eventually and allow the RC390 to overtake. (advantage RC on the straights)


                          The RC 390 is meant to be track focused. And for a bike that is "focused" or in other words, tasked with "ONLY ONE JOB TO DO", the RC390 isn't really that much faster than a versatile RR310 that can keep up quite well with the RC on a race circuit. (This is my estimate.) Someone needs to do a circuit race and also a drag race as well when the production bikes are out. The RR will be very closely behind the RC IMHO.

                          So people have more than just horse power on their minds. So what other value does the RR310 offer? Well, for starters:

                          1. A far superior cooling system that makes the RR310 actually road worthy unlike the RC 390. The RC-390 has heating issues in moderate to heavy traffic, and does not use a vent fan (it solely relies on the wind blast from forward motion). So when the Motorcycle is stuck in traffic, it heats up. BMW and TVS have completely eliminated that issue from the RR-310 by putting a fan and a sensor inside the fairing so when the bike slows down, the fan kicks in to compensate - and the hot air is directed downwards onto the road.
                          2. Better build quality than RC390. Better comfort.Yes, the RC 390 is faster than the rr310 (not by much, only by a tad bit mind you). But the RC isn't good for inner city roads at all. Not all people look for race track / highway only motorcycle. Versatility is very important.
                          3. Some people have said that the RR310 does not have a slipper clutch - that's because it doesn't need one. The Gearbox uses a negative back-rack gears and is as smooth as butter according to every single reviewer that has touched this thing.


                          The Verdict:
                          RR 310:
                          1. Costs 20K less
                          2. Can do both the highway and the city (versatility)
                          3. Offers better quality
                          4. Better Comfort
                          5. Has better low end acceleration


                          RC 390:
                          1. Has 9 more horses (measured at the crank), but that only translates to an additional speed of 10 KMPH
                          2. Weighs 20 Kgs less



                          I don't think people would lose sleep over the extra 5 or 10 KMPH top speed. TVS has played a commercial and technical masterstroke with this one. The days of RC390 are numbered in my honest opinion.
                          Last edited by tirebuster; 01-05-2018, 11:56 PM.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: TVS Apache RR 310 Review

                            Originally posted by tirebuster View Post
                            TVS has played a commercial and technical masterstroke with this one. The days of RC390 are numbered in my honest opinion.
                            Superb Summary. The KTM's are raw, edgy, aggressive and wild. They always tend to put fuel on your hooligan side, even if you don't want to. They're a very good tool to hone your riding skills on the track, but back on Indian roads where 99% of it's time is spent, they have created this image of a dangerous bike on the minds of the general public. This is where they start to become a pain in the butt for many newbies after the initial honeymoon period gets over. Basically their not versatile for our highly demanding complex roads and traffic conditions.

                            This is where like you highlighted nicely the VERSATILE nature of RR310 makes more sense for our roads. It will most certainly spoil the party RC390 had. And at the sweet price point it sits at right now, after the new Ninja 1000 and 650, this is easily THE MOTORCYCLE to buy.

                            Cheers!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: TVS Apache RR 310 Review

                              Originally posted by tirebuster View Post
                              I'm not sure if I can compare motorcycles. But I'll do it because this seems to a raging debate online these days.


                              Here's my take on KTM RC390 Vs. TVS RR310

                              I see people talking about RC 390 being better. There's 2 things I'd like to clarify here:

                              1. The RR310's build quality is at par with BMW 310s and has absolutely nothing to do with past TVS products, except the "Apache" trademark. It is extremely ignorant to write this motorcycle off on the quality front by comparing it to even foreign-made motorcycles, let alone a lowly, humble rtr 200. And yes., when you compare this to a Duke/RC, the rr310 totally beats the KTMs on quality, fit and finish and does so by a big margin. I have seen both the motorcycles (RR310 and KTM) and the quality of materials, workmanship and parts are all far superior on the 310 RR. Every little seam, nut and crimp on the rr310 is extremely well finished, even minor details are well designed and there's been absolutely no cutting corners on any level. I went in to the showroom with mediocre expectations - and the thing that caught my eye immediately, more than the styling, was the quality. I remember thinking to myself "My God, this cannot be India-made".. it was as good as the best european motorcycles.
                              2. To compare the price and Brake Horse Power (or PS) is a very shallow way to think of a motorcycle. So the argument goes that since the RR-310 is only 310cc, 34hp @2.45 Lacs on road, and the RC-390 is 375cc, 43hp @2.65 Lacs on road, the RC 390 offers a better value on a rupee-to-horsepower basis. No one disagrees with the numbers. The real purpose of horse power is to see how it translates to speed on these motorcycles, and on that front, the top end speed of the RC 390 is about 7 KMPH more than the Apache rr310. This is despite the fact that the RC's engine produces a massive 9hp more than the rr310 (as claimed by KTM). I think with a 9hp "advantage" the RC should go about 15 to 20 kmph faster than the TVS. But then again, the way power is delivered from the engine to the wheels across the entire rev range matters. From the 0-60 figures and the top speed of 160 kmph (claimed by TVS), the RR 310 definitely seems to be doing this much better than the bigger displacement RC 390. At the low end, the RR will accelerate faster than an RC390. (Advantage RR on turns & twisty circuits) In a long straight stretch, the RR310 will top out eventually and allow the RC390 to overtake. (advantage RC on the straights)


                              The RC 390 is meant to be track focused. And for a bike that is "focused" or in other words, tasked with "ONLY ONE JOB TO DO", the RC390 isn't really that much faster than a versatile RR310 that can keep up quite well with the RC on a race circuit. (This is my estimate.) Someone needs to do a circuit race and also a drag race as well when the production bikes are out. The RR will be very closely behind the RC IMHO.

                              So people have more than just horse power on their minds. So what other value does the RR310 offer? Well, for starters:

                              1. A far superior cooling system that makes the RR310 actually road worthy unlike the RC 390. The RC-390 has heating issues in moderate to heavy traffic, and does not use a vent fan (it solely relies on the wind blast from forward motion). So when the Motorcycle is stuck in traffic, it heats up. BMW and TVS have completely eliminated that issue from the RR-310 by putting a fan and a sensor inside the fairing so when the bike slows down, the fan kicks in to compensate - and the hot air is directed downwards onto the road.
                              2. Better build quality than RC390. Better comfort.Yes, the RC 390 is faster than the rr310 (not by much, only by a tad bit mind you). But the RC isn't good for inner city roads at all. Not all people look for race track / highway only motorcycle. Versatility is very important.
                              3. Some people have said that the RR310 does not have a slipper clutch - that's because it doesn't need one. The Gearbox uses a negative back-rack gears and is as smooth as butter according to every single reviewer that has touched this thing.


                              The Verdict:
                              RR 310:
                              1. Costs 20K less
                              2. Can do both the highway and the city (versatility)
                              3. Offers better quality
                              4. Better Comfort
                              5. Has better low end acceleration


                              RC 390:
                              1. Has 9 more horses (measured at the crank), but that only translates to an additional speed of 10 KMPH
                              2. Weighs 20 Kgs less



                              I don't think people would lose sleep over the extra 5 or 10 KMPH top speed. TVS has played a commercial and technical masterstroke with this one. The days of RC390 are numbered in my honest opinion.
                              Ktms top out at 180 kmph(speedo indicated)
                              Since there is no mention of "vbox tested" in claimed top speed of Apache, i'll consider it to be speedo indicated too
                              Secondly ktm has a bigger motor and makes more torque too and is lighter also and is faster than rr310 by a good margin.
                              Even the 34 ps of rr310 is measured at crank only, so at wheel the rr310 will also make less power just like the ktm.

                              The rr310 is a wonderful bike and I myself would love to own one alongside my rc390
                              Both have something to offer.
                              But yes the rr310 is far more practical than a rc 390 anyday.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X