Please ponder why "so many" find your posts offensive

Poor Rohan from the fry pan to the fire... I have been following both the duke & 200Ns updates on a regular basis

All I can say is, can we Imagine a Duke at Rs 1 Lakh price tag with all these features..styling,FE inverted forks.amazing customer service..rem all these come at a cost..
Secondly if pulsars were not good as a product..then Bajaj wldnt have been so successful in the last 10 years....

For me as a customer..i want a bike that delivers at the end of the day...hightech, lowtech, midtech..doesnt matter...should perform shld last and shld be reliable .. we call can find plenty examples for bikes tat have been successful and failures with hightech, lowtech, midtech..etc

If we strip away all the extraneous info there, your basic thesis is that the triple plug arrangement essentially has the alleged single benefit of improving emissions. If you're honestly saying that Bajaj can't get an even burn in a combustion chamber with a smaller diameter than a shot glass without resorting to the ridiculous solution of three spark sources, especially in a low-compression combustion chamber where you won't have a convoluted piston crown to have to work around, I'm left with no conclusion other than they have crap engineers. They could just as easily have accomplished that with twin plugs, were it warranted, or firing a single plug a second time during the exhaust to eliminate any unburnt fuel. However, as I also pointed out, it's just as likely to be a marketing gimmick (especially since there's another Indian manufacturer that already has a twin-plug bike). The fact that no other manufacturer has ever needed to resort to that solution is proof enough.

India isn't the only country where motorcycles need to have both low-end torque and top-end horsepower. That's a constant pretty much everywhere in the world, as a consequence of the way motorcycles have to be ridden (slow in the corners, then quick acceleration back up on the straights). A good example is the older Yamaha Genesis motors, which had 5 valves, requiring a piston crown that had so many indentations it looked like a golf ball (and thus a combustion chamber with many convolutions and pockets), and yet they managed with a single spark plug. My own GSXR1100s both had single plugs, despite being carbureted and producing far more horsepower per litre than the NS200 (and with wider combustion chambers to boot). Before you protest that those are multicylinder bikes, keep in mind that modern off-road bikes need that spread of power too, and none need a three-plug head to achieve efficient power production, even from 125cc motors.

The reality is that Bajaj has to do something to make the NS200 stand out, since it would otherwise be eclipsed by the Duke's shadow. With today's computer modeling, creating a 3-plug head is not the challenge it would have been even 5 or 10 years ago, especially since much of the final work can be done with milling machines rather than requiring the casting to be unusually complicated. No doubt Bajaj felt the extra cost of the design would be recovered through sales, since the NS is otherwise a relatively unremarkable motorcycle.

my comments were never personal .. it was only about the machine .. i cant help it if someone want to take it personally and give out revolting replies...

even i find some posts in a similar way when they are against me .. i wisely choose to ignore them as it makes no difference ..it depends on mentality of a person ..

I dont know what Data logged result will display but in feel 220 feels clearly faster as well as powerful then 200Ns so the 20cc deficit is not getting negated by supposedly better combustion hence more power by triple spark tech.

Actually i took two test ride and went till almost 100km/hr on pulsar 200ns and still was not able to fathom where that 23.5 bhp go? it felt certainly less powerful then the current 220 .

my comments were never personal .. it was only about the machine .. i cant help it if someone want to take it personally and give out revolting replies...

But that's not a licence to type anything you've in mind. No offense Rohan bro. Just telling. We all are bike lovers with passion.

So don't post comments like that.

Sometimes, your statement are over the top, and complete baseless.
@all - I humbly request you to caste a vote in this survey - Best new VFM bike in India

Hey man... you are really humorous person!! If you aren't then this post actually makes you, well you know what..

Hey bro.. you are crossing the limit. Why all this bro ? We don't got you. Don't be like this.

When I tell reply it'll cross the limit. So

sorry for OT mods, Rohan200NS is making me to quote.

guys - why do you take up everything in an offensive way ?? there is no need to ... just type out your views , people might either agree, disagree or ignore it ... simple ..

but then who knows whether all the three spark plugs are working or not .. it might be just one spark plug working and the other two are just for show and marketing gimmick purpose ...no owner is going to peel off the engine and verify the firing of all three spark plugs ..

but then who knows whether all the three spark plugs are working or not .. it might be just one spark plug working and the other two are just for show and marketing gimmick purpose ...no owner is going to peel off the engine and verify the firing of all three spark plugs ..

but then who knows whether all the three spark plugs are working or not .. it might be just one spark plug working and the other two are just for show and marketing gimmick purpose ...no owner is going to peel off the engine and verify the firing of all three spark plugs ..

but then who knows whether all the three spark plugs are working or not .. it might be just one spark plug working and the other two are just for show and marketing gimmick purpose ...no owner is going to peel off the engine and verify the firing of all three spark plugs ..

+ ++++ 1
Realy good observation , if you compare pulsar 200ns with pulsar 220 dtsfi , in terms of real tech. only twin spar frame is new that again is courtesy KTM, only thing done by Bajaj which is new is triple vs twin spark and they retrograded from Fi to Carb. I dont know what Data logged result will display but in feel 220 feels clearly faster as well as powerful then 200Ns so the 20cc deficit is not getting negated by supposedly better combustion hence more power by triple spark tech.
Actually i took two test ride and went till almost 100km/hr on pulsar 200ns and still was not able to fathom where that 23.5 bhp go? it felt certainly less powerful then the current 220 .

If we strip away all the extraneous info there, your basic thesis is that the triple plug arrangement essentially has the alleged single benefit of improving emissions. If you're honestly saying that Bajaj can't get an even burn in a combustion chamber with a smaller diameter than a shot glass without resorting to the ridiculous solution of three spark sources, especially in a low-compression combustion chamber where you won't have a convoluted piston crown to have to work around, I'm left with no conclusion other than they have crap engineers. They could just as easily have accomplished that with twin plugs, were it warranted, or firing a single plug a second time during the exhaust to eliminate any unburnt fuel. However, as I also pointed out, it's just as likely to be a marketing gimmick (especially since there's another Indian manufacturer that already has a twin-plug bike). The fact that no other manufacturer has ever needed to resort to that solution is proof enough.

India isn't the only country where motorcycles need to have both low-end torque and top-end horsepower. That's a constant pretty much everywhere in the world, as a consequence of the way motorcycles have to be ridden (slow in the corners, then quick acceleration back up on the straights). A good example is the older Yamaha Genesis motors, which had 5 valves, requiring a piston crown that had so many indentations it looked like a golf ball (and thus a combustion chamber with many convolutions and pockets), and yet they managed with a single spark plug. My own GSXR1100s both had single plugs, despite being carbureted and producing far more horsepower per litre than the NS200 (and with wider combustion chambers to boot). Before you protest that those are multicylinder bikes, keep in mind that modern off-road bikes need that spread of power too, and none need a three-plug head to achieve efficient power production, even from 125cc motors.

The reality is that Bajaj has to do something to make the NS200 stand out, since it would otherwise be eclipsed by the Duke's shadow. With today's computer modeling, creating a 3-plug head is not the challenge it would have been even 5 or 10 years ago, especially since much of the final work can be done with milling machines rather than requiring the casting to be unusually complicated. No doubt Bajaj felt the extra cost of the design would be recovered through sales, since the NS is otherwise a relatively unremarkable motorcycle.