Now I'm using BikeWale as my reference here, so incase their data doesn't really match it'll be helpful if you correct it here.
Eg. one of the best examples is:- Location selected is Mumbai - wherever there was Sub-Area was asked I entered Kandivali(W).
| Bikes | Binelli TNT300 | Kawasaki Z250 |
| Ex-Showroom (Mumbai) | 3,14,000 | 3,22,440 |
| RTO | 64,300 | 30,440 |
| Insurance | 6,918 | 7,754 |
Now comparing 2 cruisers
| Bikes | HD 750 Strt | HyS Aquilla Pro650 |
| Ex-Showroom (Mumbai) | 5,20,213 | 5,63,000 |
| RTO | 60,562 | 83,820 |
| Insurance | 18,800 | 12,519 |
| Bikes | Binelli 600i Std | Kawasaki Er6N | HyS GT650N |
| Ex-Showroom (Mumbai) | 5,62,000 | 4,88,665 | 4,12,000 |
| RTO | 1,17,400 | 50,287 | 59,180 |
| Insurance | 12,499 | 11,705 | 9,433 |
And what will really blow your bearings is that Kawasaki Z800 which is almost 50k higher in price, 150cc higher in CC, has about 18k lower RTO costs!!!
One consistent trend is Kawasaki has much lower registration costs compared to bikes priced cheaper! Which means that the popular explanation that RTO Cost = "Certain percent of the total cost" is definitely not true. This trend continues on even when you compare Triumphs, Ducatis & the likes.
Looking at all the different examples, there's definitely things other than "CC", type of Engine, No of Cylinders, type of Bike etc even price factor is negated. So what is it?? Does Euro/ARAI complaint have some role? CKD, CBU etc play a role? Or is it that Companies like Kawasaki (thanks to Bajaj) has negotiated a much cheaper rate for Registrations? and Companies like Binelli certainly have not done it that well - since it's consistently highest?.
Again I'm not taking about total price of on-road price I'm only discussing difference in "RTO Registration Cost" and nothing else.
The objective of this thread is simply academic - intellectual masturbation
sort of cracking this code of how is it actually calculated which is consistent atleast across a segment.




Comment