I am planning to buy a bike and after some RnD, I was left with Apache 180 and Pulsar 220F to select from.
I am 5"6 and 56kg
I use the bike for daily commuting and my daily usage will be around 12kms, Budget is 90,000.
I rode Apache. It was good, has very good pickup but didn't felt comfortable with its riding posture, Yet to Test Drive Pulsar.
I got few doubts. I am listing them below. Please clarify
1. Is P220 engine Liquid cooled or Air cooled ? In Pulsar website, Key Features, it says as " the Pulsar 220F is equipped with an oil cooler for better engine cooling and"
2.I don't like the fairing, I can go for P220-S, but I dont want to miss the projector headlamp on 220F model.
After some usage, am thinking of modding by removing the "fairing" part and keeping those projector headlight.
Your thoughts on this ?
3.I read that rear disk break is not very effective. Is it so ?
4.Whats difference between P220-DTSi and P220-FI ? Isnt FI technology not embedded into present DTSi model. Any detail about this would be helpful ?
I rode RXZ, and presently riding RX-135 and I love to shoot away when signal goes green

Issues with A180 are its riding position and I personally feel it looks a bit small as compared to P220
Please get me out of this confusion and help me decide which is best

Cheers,
The RX-Guy




Why? Just because of the name "Yamaha"?

Comment