Tweet
hi guy I help me out on new bike between hero karizma or hero karizma zmr my daily driving is 60 km up&down to office and weekend long drive 150 km plz help me
-
-
Thread Approved
Do tell us more about yourself so that we can help you better.Advice is a form of nostalgia.
Dispensing it is a way of fishing the past from the disposal, wiping it off, painting over the ugly parts and recycling it for more than it's worth.
Antz Travelz!! | South India Exploration Ride | Leh Triplog (Work in progress) -
Karizma is really outdated.When compared to zmr the most important thing lacking is rear disc.Its funny they put i a RD for cbz ,hunk and not for karizma.
20k price difference.
If you have no problems with budget get ZMR,sell those nasty fairings(No trouble finding a buyer,lot of posers would want them for their 125cc),put in R's fairings.That is what I would do.
If you are ready to sacrifice on goodies R is the one!"Vibes transmitted from crank shaft to frame, then through the bearings of the head stock and into the stem where it meets the triple clamp and into the clip-ons where it is greeted with great pleasure by my hands"-ratfighter mod rtrComment
-
hi thank for appored the thread i current drive 2005 hero honda cbz star i am saleing it because i am not geting spare parts for that bike and i am very fat guy soComment
-
If you don't have any budget problem then go for ZMR, you will get better mileage than R ... For commuting ZMR is best and it has the rear disc which R is lagging..Originally posted by B.N.abhijit View PostComment
-
ZMR all the way,comfort,mileage,hero maintenance.....
The best of the lot....Hero Honda Dawn-2009-2011
Hero Honda CBZ Xtreme-2011-2017
KTM Duke390 2016- till nowComment
-
In between these 2...Obviously ZMR is better as it offers Honda's FI system which helps in removing cold starting ,a problem which many ZMA r users do face..Also it comes with Clip-ons ,rear disc,better suspension,great console..all of this making ZMR good enough over old R..Don't Honk UnnecessarilyComment
-
if it is a fuel injection system zmr so there must be minimum petrol and how much and my question I hear if fuel tank that empty or dry fuel injection will be damage and fuel injection of zmr is 15000 rs ? because i my new to this system so plz help me out on this plz plzComment
-
For looks, fuel efficiency and if price is not a problem, then Zmr. But if you want a stronger, better drive, better handling, better cost efficiency and maintenance, then definately the Karizma R. Zmr fuel injection parts cost a bomb.Originally posted by B.N.abhijit View PostComment
-
Go for ZMR if you can afford. The FI engine is more fuel efficient and has better crispy in-gear acceleration. No headaches of mechanics screwing up the carb tuning. No headaches of cold starts. Better braking with rear disc, tubeless tyres, and GRS rear shocks. The console is better than ZMA and the clip-on handle bars look cool.
HH Karizma (Current) || CBF Stunner PGM-FI || Honda CB Unicorn Dazzler
Honda Aviator || Kinetic Flyte || Kinetic Blaze || HH Splendor
Two ZMAs, 9 Days in Western GhatsComment
-
ZMR is more heavier bike specially at the front, FE is better, but expensive to maintain, Fuel pump costs approx 12k and many owners have complaint about it blowing up. 9 kgs more than std zma and similar power output.Originally posted by ravi@17bhp View PostGo for ZMR if you can afford. The FI engine is more fuel efficient and has better crispy in-gear acceleration. No headaches of mechanics screwing up the carb tuning. No headaches of cold starts. Better braking with rear disc, tubeless tyres, and GRS rear shocks. The console is better than ZMA and the clip-on handle bars look cool.
ZMA is less expensive on the pocket, comparable performance, tried tested, ( just get rear tyre changed), FE around 33, Nimble and lighter to move around.
Go in for ZMA
Having owned both ZMA ( 4 years ) and ZMR ( 1.5years) this is what i feelM3:15Comment
-
Never knew blown-up fuel pump in ZMR. Maintenance-wise, both ZMR and Karizma are expensive, ZMR being a bit more expensive. These expenses would be warranted in case of any fall only. As long as there is no fall, everything will be fine. Anyway, you have owned both the bikes, and you will be in a better position to conclude than me. I have used ZMR for a long tour and small rides. Felt it to ride better than Karizma, especially the in-gear acceleration. Got an FE of 47 kmpl at 90 kmph, where my ZMA returned only 39 kmpl.Originally posted by worrisomebear View Post
HH Karizma (Current) || CBF Stunner PGM-FI || Honda CB Unicorn Dazzler
Honda Aviator || Kinetic Flyte || Kinetic Blaze || HH Splendor
Two ZMAs, 9 Days in Western GhatsComment
-
Ravi bhai, you are forgetting that older gen Karizma's rear fiber used to rattle even without a fall. They were so brittleOriginally posted by ravi@17bhp View PostNever knew blown-up fuel pump in ZMR. Maintenance-wise, both ZMR and Karizma are expensive, ZMR being a bit more expensive. These expenses would be warranted in case of any fall only. As long as there is no fall, everything will be fine. Anyway, you have owned both the bikes, and you will be in a better position to conclude than me. I have used ZMR for a long tour and small rides. Felt it to ride better than Karizma, especially the in-gear acceleration. Got an FE of 47 kmpl at 90 kmph, where my ZMA returned only 39 kmpl.
lol.
Oh and the rear indicators
You'll never find a Karizma having them or them working, either they would not be there or hanging on the bike
Comment
Comment