Announcement

**The Monk** · 03-10-2013, 11:05 PM

Query Approved

Please try formating your post to make it more readable thanks.

**manas34** · 03-10-2013, 11:29 PM

As you are 6 feet tall like me(6'1"), i feel fz can never be comfortable for you and will look like giraffe sitting on cycle(i.e. its way too small size) so it will always be a good bet to buy a pulsar 200NS, dont worry on its reliablity as effort made by bajaj is too good on it.

BTW why dont you consider karizma R?, Atleast i felt its a too good bike and comfortable for people like us(6 footers).

**Satyamzma** · 03-11-2013, 12:51 PM

I think P200ns will be much better then FZ......ZMA r obviously will be great as it's well suited for tall riders..

**rx100.7050** · 03-11-2013, 01:18 PM

Kool Jack : Do you know that your post and that too 1st post in the forum, makes you look like an immature lad??

Anyway : To begin with, putting FZ & 200NS in the same category in itself doesn't do any justice. Totally different bike with quite a lot of difference in Performance. If you wat a bike purely for City rides & nothing more then don't waste money on 200 NS because it's capable of much more than that. Tech wise too, I would rate 200NS a notch higher than Fz.

And don't just make randon statement that "I heard Pulsar bikes are not reliable"

**somen1984** · 03-11-2013, 02:16 PM

Originally posted by kool jack View Post

Myself i am 6 feet tall and weigh 54kgs........ my budget is 1L...have a lot of confusion for which one to go fz or NS ....it should give mileage of around 35 atleast....i love the looks of both fz and NS but i feel fz has an edge over NS....but when it comes to power ,torque there is no comparison....NS is long way ahead.....bike is mostly for city rides....and i heard pulsar bikes aren't that reliable........but what ab NS......guys owning NS please help me out.....so pls suggest which bike best suits me of this two or any other.....for tall guys like me would NS be a better choice??......and i am not interested in avenger enfield because they are way too heavy for me to handle

Bro , Why you expect others to judge or recommend which bike will suit you ?? We are not you, different people have different thoughts and personality.
The best eternal way is "TEST RIDE" several times which ever bike you are shortlisting.
No showroom person will stop you from long ride of atleast 5kms or more. Just pay them the petrol. After all they want their sale to happen.
Test ride will give you the best idea about it's handling/performance/comfort/suitability etc...

And I see who have already answered your own query which bike suit you the best :

Originally posted by kool jack View Post

Myself i am 6 feet tall and weigh 54kgs........ my budget is 1L

Originally posted by kool jack View Post

...but when it comes to power ,torque there is no comparison....NS is long way ahead..

Originally posted by kool jack View Post

and i am not interested in avenger enfield because they are way too heavy for me to handle..

You are looking for bike which suits Tall people along with good power and torque .....so even you know which bikes is best for you. Now bajaj is way ahead then it's histories...so NS is no doubt a good bike..

FZ is now old tech, model and missing few features as well.

**kool jack** · 03-11-2013, 09:34 PM

@ the monk....this was my first post....will surely improve it the next time

**kool jack** · 03-11-2013, 09:36 PM

Originally posted by manas34 View Post

As you are 6 feet tall like me(6'1"), i feel fz can never be comfortable for you and will look like giraffe sitting on cycle(i.e. its way too small size) so it will always be a good bet to buy a pulsar 200NS, dont worry on its reliablity as effort made by bajaj is too good on it.

BTW why dont you consider karizma R?, Atleast i felt its a too good bike and comfortable for people like us(6 footers).

thanks. But karizma has become old one . I was thinking of new one

**kool jack** · 03-11-2013, 09:44 PM

Originally posted by rx100.7050 View Post

Kool Jack : Do you know that your post and that too 1st post in the forum, makes you look like an immature lad??

Anyway : To begin with, putting FZ & 200NS in the same category in itself doesn't do any justice. Totally different bike with quite a lot of difference in Performance. If you wat a bike purely for City rides & nothing more then don't waste money on 200 NS because it's capable of much more than that. Tech wise too, I would rate 200NS a notch higher than Fz.

And don't just make randon statement that "I heard Pulsar bikes are not reliable"

i made that statement because most of my friends owning pulsar felt that way . no offence

ur the second person complaining ab my post and now i also see why is that and will work on it

and thanks for the suggestion....i will probably go with NS

**kool jack** · 03-11-2013, 09:52 PM

Originally posted by Satyamzma View Post

I think P200ns will be much better then FZ......ZMA r obviously will be great as it's well suited for tall riders..

ok i will test ride NS and ZMA and see which suits best thanks

**kool jack** · 03-11-2013, 09:54 PM

Originally posted by somen1984 View Post

Bro , Why you expect others to judge or recommend which bike will suit you ?? We are not you, different people have different thoughts and personality.
The best eternal way is "TEST RIDE" several times which ever bike you are shortlisting.
No showroom person will stop you from long ride of atleast 5kms or more. Just pay them the petrol. After all they want their sale to happen.
Test ride will give you the best idea about it's handling/performance/comfort/suitability etc...

And I see who have already answered your own query which bike suit you the best :

You are looking for bike which suits Tall people along with good power and torque .....so even you know which bikes is best for you. Now bajaj is way ahead then it's histories...so NS is no doubt a good bike..

FZ is now old tech, model and missing few features as well.

thought of having advice from u guys

ok will test ride NS and see if its comfortable

**pcgamer** · 03-11-2013, 11:54 PM

Originally posted by kool jack View Post

thought of having advice from u guys

ok will test ride NS and see if its comfortable

Test ride as advised by others. Again, in terms of specs, performance etc, NS is way above.

One tip: Please use 'Multi-Quote' button (next to 'Reply With Quote') while quoting multiple posts and avoid back to back posting

**kool jack** · 03-13-2013, 10:41 PM

Originally posted by pcgamer View Post

Test ride as advised by others. Again, in terms of specs, performance etc, NS is way above.

One tip: Please use 'Multi-Quote' button (next to 'Reply With Quote') while quoting multiple posts and avoid back to back posting

ok thanks.....after test riding i will understand whether i can handle it or not . But do u think i can handle it since i am just 54 kg

**Touseef Ahmed Mohammed** · 03-14-2013, 11:54 AM

Originally posted by kool jack View Post

Myself i am 6 feet tall and weigh 54kgs........ my budget is 1L...have a lot of confusion for which one to go fz or NS ....it should give mileage of around 35 atleast....i love the looks of both fz and NS but i feel fz has an edge over NS....but when it comes to power ,torque there is no comparison....NS is long way ahead.....bike is mostly for city rides....and i heard pulsar bikes aren't that reliable........but what ab NS......guys owning NS please help me out.....so pls suggest which bike best suits me of this two or any other.....for tall guys like me would NS be a better choice??......and i am not interested in avenger enfield because they are way too heavy for me to handle

I would suggest you to go for Pulsar 200 NS.
As said, Fz cant even catch the smoke of Pulsar 200 NS, as there is a Huge difference in technology & a difference in Displacement.
Coming to the Pulsar 200 NS, i say its the Best value for money Bike in 200cc segment.
The way Bajaj worked hard on it, & gave some Different technology which is latest of the day.
The 4 Valve triple spark engine delivers thrilling performance at all speeds, a better power & mileage as it is triple spark.
Liquid cooling, mono suspension, 6 speed gear box which makes FLY
The petal discs & underbelly exhaust are latest features from Bajaj.
One thing you will love in Pulsar 200 NS is its power. I say its even more powerful than the Pulsar 220.
The stuff i disliked in the Pulsar 200 NS is its tail section. It looks Identical to the Pulsar 135. Bajaj would have worked well on the Tail section & make it look different from all Pulsars. The tyre's pattern too isnt that great, but provides exceptional Roadgrip. Coming to Reliability of Bajaj, I say Bajaj's bikes are Reliable both in city & highway, But dont expect them to be the Only Best in Reliability & im sure you wont be hurt by the word RELIABILITY OF BAJAJ. They are good enough.
I am sure you will enjoy Riding the Pulsar 200 NS both in city & highways.
Coming to Fz, i own one.
Fz is a Great machine. Many features in Fz & 200NS are similar such as mono shocks, fully digital instrumentation, Naked styling, C.O.M etc.
Good in city, coming to performance, it performs well, the styling is great.
Looks massive from all angles. Handling is really good.
Mileage figures are decent.
But Fz is outdated in terms of Engine technology. For those who want to maintain a high speed, Fz's Highway performance is not so impressive.
So its a modern world, go for a Modern bikes with whole lots of goodies.
GO FOR THE PULSAR 200 NS

**somen1984** · 03-14-2013, 04:42 PM

Originally posted by kool jack View Post

ok thanks.....after test riding i will understand whether i can handle it or not . But do u think i can handle it since i am just 54 kg

Do you have will ?? Then you can easily !!

Announcement

fz or NS 200 ??

fz or NS 200 ??

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment