Please find below my query/requirements in detail:
I am pretty sure I am quite confused! I was quite certain a few weeks ago that i wanted to put my money down on a Continental GT (RE) but recent ownership experiences and the lack of ABS on something north of 2.2 lakhs has got me thinking.
At 6 ft tall and 90 Kgs I am on the heavier side and am primarily looking to add on to my Pulsar 200 ns, a bike which will bring that smile back on my face. The CBR 250 R is too long in the tooth and frankly looks too uninspiring but the RC has had my attention since it was launched. As of right now I consider it an excellent VFM product, just like the NS which has done right by me over the 3 years I have owned it. Why I am hesitating is because I know the new Dukes are coming in 2017. Now this is just speculation but i think that these features will also find their way into the RC. So would buying it now be wise? Also does the RC get the slipper clutch like the Duke 390?
I have not had the pleasure of test riding the RC but will do it in the next couple of days. Due to some obligations (dont wanna go in detail) I may have to make the purchase by October end. Can someone give me a no nonsense/ no sugar coated pros and cons of the RC 390. I will be using it primarily for recreational riding and dont think that with the committed riding position i will be using it for the highways. i have the NS for everyday practical use and highway blasts. I just need something more raw and eager for fighting the blues.
Also i would like to know how difficult it would be to maintain 2 bikes. I am guessing the RC returns around 20 to 30 KMPL. My NS is in great condition and doesnt require any expenses apart from the usual service.
Thanks in advance.





Comment