Announcement

**Aryan** · 01-15-2010, 11:18 PM

Topic Approved.

**Bibhu** · 01-15-2010, 11:24 PM

Dude, Handling wise the 220 s is much better than the F as it does away with the bulky fairing. Even in acceleration it felt slightly faster than the fastest Indian, only slightly though. However, the 220 s will be lost in the hoardes of 180s, 150s and 200s. The 220 f with its projectors and quarter fairing still stands apart in all pulsars.

**srini** · 01-16-2010, 05:50 AM

^^^
+1...P220s will surely be a better handler of the two...

**Coffin On Wheels** · 01-16-2010, 07:44 AM

thanks guys i think i will take the 220 dtsi F,as it will stand out in the crowd.

**truelypulsarian** · 01-16-2010, 08:39 AM

220 faired version looks sexy with the predator head lamps

.

I just love those head lamps

.

**niks_devil666** · 01-16-2010, 08:56 AM

p220 was always a better handler than p200. p200 was too much front biased. The faired version should be better in terms of handling.

**nirvan** · 01-16-2010, 09:13 AM

Originally posted by niks_devil666 View Post

p220 was always a better handler than p200. p200 was too much front biased. The faired version should be better in terms of handling.

Why would that be? I fail to understand how a fairing could contribute to handling.

I would have thought the frame, suspension and tyres and perhaps, steering geometry put together are what makes a bike handle like it does.

Besides, if the 200 was front heavy, then the 220 should be front heavier with that fairing, shouldn't it?

**Hanith** · 01-24-2010, 11:38 PM

^^
No man...200 is front bulky than 220...(TD both rides n observe )

So..the new 220 s would not be good handler than 220 F...
The Fairing is really confidence inspiring..
I would suggest 220 F any time..any day eyes closed

Announcement

Suggestions Invited

Suggestions Invited

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment