In my opinion, the notion of somehow restoring traffic discipline through the mandated installation of a speed governor is ridiculous. First, it in no way addresses the main problem on Odishi roads, which is an almost complete failure to abide by things like lane markings and traffic signals. Speed is *not* the problem, or at least not excessive speed (though mandating a *minimum* speed on main roads might help some). Second, issuing this mandate is a tacit admission that the police are incapable of enforcing ordinary traffic regulations. That is something the government has to fix itself; it can't put the burden on the public.
Edit: Per the Telegraph, Dec 7, this is still slated to go forward. A panel has been put together to review this. The thrust of the article was to limit the speed on buses and other heavy transport, but there is mention of imposing it on private vehicles also.
Keep in mind that while this *might* have some impact on accidents on what passes for high-speed roads, it will do nothing for in-town accidents (which no doubt comprise the bulk of all accidents), since the majority of them will occur at lower speeds than the governor is set at. It will also rob motorcyclists in particular of a "weapon" they currently have to *avoid* accidents, since many bikes have enough acceleration to "get ahead" of a potential accident. With the imposition of a governor, that possibility will be eliminated, leaving the biker only the option of jamming on the brakes and hoping not to get hit too hard. However, again, this is a tacit admission by the government that they cannot manage traffic properly. Instead of setting up speed traps on "dangerous" roads like the Bhubaneswar-Puri road (and there's no reason they can't; speed can be timed with a stopwatch if they can't get ahold of a radar gun), and instead of having the police do proper patrols instead of snoozing in their vehicle in the shade of some side street, the government instead punishes the general public for the actions of the miscreants.



Comment