Since '02 xBhp is different things to different people. From a close knit national community of bikers to India's only motorcycling lifestyle magazine and a place to make like-minded biker friends. Join us

Castrol Power 1

Practice slow-speed riding.

Our Partner

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

220f or should i wait for the 200ns ??

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by worrisomebear View Post
    go in for ktm or pulsar 200ns, also hyosung gt250 launch is on june 7th
    Hyosung is a strict no for me due to its sporty sitting stance. No KTM since my bike would serve as family vechicle sometimes... So the competetion is between 200NS & P220. I intend to tur so may be P220 would be a better choice due to projectors. Also I love 220's looks.
    Siddhartha
    ZMA (2004) - SOLD
    CBR250R(2012)....


    Comment


    • #17
      However 1 thing missing here is torquey nature of 220 F's engine.Also as 200 NS is a new product from Bajaj, I would wait atleast 6-8 months for the issues to be ironed out.

      I ride a 220F, and am waiting to upgrade. However, none of the new bikes (CBR, KTM,P200NS) look like an actual upgrade.

      I guess there will be substantial Price difference between 220F and 200NS once it is launched.

      for 80k 220F is VFM.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by anoopjoyjoy View Post

        and how much do you think the pulsar200ns will cost ?
        i saw that the expected cost is around 90-95k, but how much will be the on road cost ? will it be more than a lak ?
        in bangalore the price wont be less than 1.10 lakhs on road.. As petrol prices are hiked today.. Dont expect any launch of higher cc bikes for a month atleast.. Its time for boasting mileage figure bikes and cars in the newspapers..

        Comment


        • #19
          GUYS
          can some one give an unbiased comparison of the 2 in all the segments of the bike...me too planning on getting one???confused coz of 20cc more in p220 and better bhp from the NS...
          sigpic

          "A high power out put alone does not make a great bike, there is more to it than that."


          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by the_ghost_rider View Post
            GUYS
            can some one give an unbiased comparison of the 2 in all the segments of the bike...me too planning on getting one???confused coz of 20cc more in p220 and better bhp from the NS...
            go through the 2 reviews of 200 ns again.you should get a fair idea about what's good and what's not in 200 over 220.
            and the question remains why do i race?
            every finishing line is the begining of a new race.

            #i have learnt to manipulate my own adrenaline and the perception of biking is different.
            #overkill is underrated.
            #how random roads may appear there is always a destination.sigpic
            #i don't subscribe to co-incidence,either it is the rider or the other moron on the road

            (:)people keeps on saying add spark to life, bajaj got hold of that idea and added an extra spark to bike.

            Comment


            • #21
              2 weeks ago saw pulsar 200NS in real for the 1st time. The rugged looks are somewhat similar to the Yamaha FZ series. If given a choice go for 200NS than P220 because of nice looks,are uncommon on roads and a good mileage.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by sayank10 View Post
                go through the 2 reviews of 200 ns again.you should get a fair idea about what's good and what's not in 200 over 220.
                i have read about the review and the long term thing about the NS the thing is in power some say that the NS just feels like a baby to the p220...i know the ns GOT 23BHP and P220 21...think its better if i do a TD..but just want tot know which ones better in performance...top speed and about the gearing
                sigpic

                "A high power out put alone does not make a great bike, there is more to it than that."


                Comment


                • #23
                  Kids NEED to grow up. That's the expectation when you join XBHP because you are much more informed than any other tom dick & harry
                  It feels " " BABY" " because it has less weight but at the same time more horses under it's command. I own a 220 & I love it to the hilt. But I won't hesitate to say that 200 is better since it has less weight (nimble enough) & more power.
                  "HASTA LA VICTORIA, SIEMPRE !" - Chesigpic


                  http://www.xbhp.com/talkies/tourer/18983-spicy-sour-sweet-short-honeymoon-trip.html

                  http://www.xbhp.com/talkies/tourer/20306-pursuit-swarghat.html#post716409

                  http://www.xbhp.com/talkies/tourer/2...sary-trip.html

                  http://www.xbhp.com/talkies/tourer/2...adventure.html

                  http://www.xbhp.com/talkies/tourer/2...j-monsoon.html

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by the_ghost_rider View Post
                    i have read about the review and the long term thing about the NS the thing is in power some say that the NS just feels like a baby to the p220...i know the ns GOT 23BHP and P220 21...think its better if i do a TD..but just want tot know which ones better in performance...top speed and about the gearing
                    i am really interested in knowing who are those people??

                    200 is better performer in all aspect.
                    topspeed is slightly more managable on 220
                    both are tall-geared
                    and the question remains why do i race?
                    every finishing line is the begining of a new race.

                    #i have learnt to manipulate my own adrenaline and the perception of biking is different.
                    #overkill is underrated.
                    #how random roads may appear there is always a destination.sigpic
                    #i don't subscribe to co-incidence,either it is the rider or the other moron on the road

                    (:)people keeps on saying add spark to life, bajaj got hold of that idea and added an extra spark to bike.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by sayank10 View Post
                      i am really interested in knowing who are those people??
                      check out the 200ns owership....dont remember the page..

                      Originally posted by sayank10 View Post
                      200 is better performer in all aspect.
                      topspeed is slightly more managable on 220
                      both are tall-geared
                      THAT EXPLAINS ALOT THANKS..
                      but now ii got another question 200ns or yzf r15...
                      iknow both are two different leagues but still any body who has experienced it would like to share abit light here
                      Last edited by the_ghost_rider; 08-02-2012, 11:05 AM.
                      sigpic

                      "A high power out put alone does not make a great bike, there is more to it than that."


                      Comment


                      • #26
                        @Thread Starter,

                        Pick the NS, its the best Pulsar till date. It out performs the current P220 interms of all aspects. Also the ride quality and engine has been refined to an extent that none of the old pulsars can compete with it.

                        Remember if the NS succeeds the older P220 may be phased out. So stay updated with the NS.
                        https://www.facebook.com/harishtheboss

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X