2010 RTR may sport ABS...nothing else...ok,okay,I'm off the topic.As for the bike,it depends on your riding style...RTR is a hoot to ride,Zma is stressfree and the P220,well...it's a bit of both.Have TD of all the bikes you've listed and decide for yourself.

boy, it is 220 all the way.
i was also in the same dilemma. On my list there was every bike from FZ to ZMA to R15. But on suggestions of XBHPians I zeroed upon 220. And believe me, I am happier than anything.
I know that in the looks department(for me) FZ and Zma is better(for you i think RTR). But I think "One can get bored or used to the looks, but one can never get bored or used to the performance."
Don't go all by looks, 220 is a serious performer.
Whatever your choice is, post it when u decide.

Tough call!

Thanks for the input boys!!

For me ZMR is out of question since I dont wanna spend a lac for a 17bhp PGMFI engine!
Coming to P220, I have some serious doubts about how the bike'll be after a year or two... lots of pulsars I see on roads look as though they have spent 2years in the police impound! They get old very easily since Bajaj comes up with reincarnations every now and then! But I must say 220cc and 21bhp 're enough to shut everybody's mouth!
ZMA is good in every sense except for the design which is built only to churn hundreds of miles on highways!

Boy! RTR is a pure joy to ride, aggresive looks, racy design, grunty... almost perfect! Hooligans rejoice!

^So is the RTR 180 the final choice you have made?