CF chassis has been around for a while now. While it may be expensive on a 'street' bike, it not being there as 'usual' has got little impact on where its being used.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The New Ducati 1199 Panigale : Coming Soon
Collapse
X
-
Sorry sir, that patent image has got little to do with it having a CF chassis.Plus, you don't usually use carbon fibre on engine body, which is the chassis' main part here.
CF chassis has been around for a while now. While it may be expensive on a 'street' bike, it not being there as 'usual' has got little impact on where its being used.Super CommuTOURer� - Talk less, Ride more
.: FB :.|.: TW :.|*IG*| Ex PowerDrift:.
#Give thy opinion, write em, dont throw em
#Everyone errs, accept it, defending/cribbing about it only makes it worse
#Dont defend a manufacturer as if you work for them
#Write. Think. If relevant hit submit. If not hit yourself
#Be kind in your choice of words, you never know who would make you gulp em
� Satyen Poojary
-
My point putting the image was only to understand the rigidity of the new frame design, as I mentioned clearly in my post. Like you said, this has nothing to do with frame being CF or Alu.Originally posted by satyenpoojary View PostSorry sir, that patent image has got little to do with it having a CF chassis.
CF chassis has been around for a while now. While it may be expensive on a 'street' bike, it not being there as 'usual' has got little impact on where its being used.
Otherwise, yes, CF has been used on road bikes and will continue to be used... Maybe a future 1199R might have it, who knows?---
Brotherhood, Rules, Freedom. Xbhp.
Indian riding = Alertness, Anticipation and Adjustment.
Comment
-
Ah! Ok! Its easy to misread that post.
Nevertheless, doesnt street bikes go wSbk and not GP?Super CommuTOURer� - Talk less, Ride more
.: FB :.|.: TW :.|*IG*| Ex PowerDrift:.
#Give thy opinion, write em, dont throw em
#Everyone errs, accept it, defending/cribbing about it only makes it worse
#Dont defend a manufacturer as if you work for them
#Write. Think. If relevant hit submit. If not hit yourself
#Be kind in your choice of words, you never know who would make you gulp em
� Satyen Poojary
Comment
-
this is a nice discussion emerging here,
one more thing, suppose engine as a component has a rigidity= X
and aluminium chasis has a rigidity of = Y
so if we use engine as a stressed member of frame, the central part of the bike has a rigidity = X
and if we use engine mounted on aluminium chasis then the combined rigidity of central part of bike / frame = X+Y
is this wrong?
Comment
-
Its not that easy, we can't just add the two and decide the regidity.Originally posted by princesirohi View Postthis is a nice discussion emerging here,
one more thing, suppose engine as a component has a rigidity= X
and aluminium chasis has a rigidity of = Y
so if we use engine as a stressed member of frame, the central part of the bike has a rigidity = X
and if we use engine mounted on aluminium chasis then the combined rigidity of central part of bike / frame = X+Y
is this wrong?
it actually depends on the way you are connecting the two. In what orientation, and how much overlapping takes place at the joints.
apart from that since a bike is more sensitive structure than a car, the rigidity figures also come from the weight distribution.
how much weight at front, rear and middle.
but for a conclusion in your message above, X and Y together will add to the regidity, but not in just X+Y fashion
More over the beauty of the Ducatis that I like is that though the older engines were less powerfull in terms engine power, the less weight and losses upto the rear wheel actually made them match/faster then their rivals
They still have same enginerring characteristics reflecting from their current models because of which Ducati is still a winning machine in WSBK.Last edited by R-series; 09-22-2011, 06:28 PM.Just because you haven't seen it doesnt mean its impossible...expect the unexpected.
Comment
-
+1Originally posted by R-series View PostIts not that easy, we can't just add the two and decide the regidity.
it actually depends on the way you are connecting the two. In what orientation, and how much overlapping takes place at the joints.
apart from that since a bike is more sensitive structure than a car, the rigidity figures also come from the weight distribution.
how much weight at front, rear and middle.
but for a conclusion in your message above, X and Y together will add to the regidity, but not in just X+Y fashion
More over the beauty of the Ducatis that I like is that though the older engines were less powerfull in terms engine power, the less weight and losses upto the rear wheel actually made them match/faster then their rivals
They still have same enginerring characteristics reflecting from their current models because of which Ducati is still a winning machine in WSBK.
Its almost like saying a 9 inch Screw weilded to a Solid Iron cylinder of 15KG and being balanced on the screws end OR on the base of the cylinder will carry the rigidity of the Cylinder
Super CommuTOURer� - Talk less, Ride more
.: FB :.|.: TW :.|*IG*| Ex PowerDrift:.
#Give thy opinion, write em, dont throw em
#Everyone errs, accept it, defending/cribbing about it only makes it worse
#Dont defend a manufacturer as if you work for them
#Write. Think. If relevant hit submit. If not hit yourself
#Be kind in your choice of words, you never know who would make you gulp em
� Satyen Poojary
Comment
-
i hope it gives the Beamer a run for its money or even surpass it!
Smoke rubber,not tobacco.
-Life Through-the-Lens
-For HELLA/VALEO [BMW/AUDI/FORD/LINCOLN/SKODA],P220,Aftermarket Projectors,pls contact me!
Comment
-
I am pretty sure that beemer will still remain the best VFM there is(excluding india).Ducati is going to cost a bomb.That is the only thing which is going to go against the panigale(that name is going to take a little getting used to).Originally posted by RanjithMN View Posti hope it gives the Beamer a run for its money or even surpass it!
Last edited by Ghost11; 09-22-2011, 08:56 PM.
Comment
-
I agree, not doubts on that, but you see the there is a reason why its called he ferrari of bikes. The extra price will have pretty new inovations and features with it.Originally posted by Ghost11 View PostI am pretty sure that beemer will still remain the best VFM there is(excluding india).Ducati is going to cost a bomb.That is the only thing which is going to go against the panigale(that name is going to take a little getting used to).
More over, Ducati is for those who need a Ducati, nothing satisfies them apart from a Ducati. These guys don't just want a Bike, they want a Ducati.
and I'm sure few thousand $ won't stop a die hard ducati fan from picking this
..includes me
Just because you haven't seen it doesnt mean its impossible...expect the unexpected.
Comment
-
thats the point i was trying to convey, all i meant was that X + Y is always greater than X alone.Originally posted by R-series View Postbut for a conclusion in your message above, X and Y together will add to the regidity, but not in just X+Y fashion

ofcourse 9 inch screws can balance a lot more then just a cylinder...Originally posted by satyenpoojary View Post+1
Its almost like saying a 9 inch Screw weilded to a Solid Iron cylinder of 15KG and being balanced on the screws end OR on the base of the cylinder will carry the rigidity of the Cylinder



Comment
-
Sorry saar... But that tag belongs to the Augustas...Originally posted by R-series View PostI agree, not doubts on that, but you see the there is a reason why its called he ferrari of bikes. The extra price will have pretty new inovations and features with it.
More over, Ducati is for those who need a Ducati, nothing satisfies them apart from a Ducati. These guys don't just want a Bike, they want a Ducati.
and I'm sure few thousand $ won't stop a die hard ducati fan from picking this
..includes me 
"stay hungry, stay foolish."
To those who have attitude... My middle finger salutes you...!
Rajmachi Conquered...!
sigpic
Comment
-
Basically, frame rigidity can be a factor of frame thickness (at the thin-most points), the material strength, and its flexibility.
@ Prince: X+Y might make it rigid enough, but heavier & wider too. So, why not use a fatter "X" component alone only? A Strong material, which is light too, with negligible flex is what engineers hunt.
I remember when Desmosedici RR specs were released in 2007, it's chassis had a torsional rigidity of 4250 NM/degree, compared to 2300 NM/degree (or something) for 1098.
Although this chassis managed to be lighter than 1098's chassis, despite more rigidity (due to alloy involved probably), the swingarm had to be made 10% heavier for about 35% more stiffness.---
Brotherhood, Rules, Freedom. Xbhp.
Indian riding = Alertness, Anticipation and Adjustment.
Comment
-
thats some good information ...man. can you tell us the stiffness of current yamaha R1 or M1 or factory honda bikes in motogp.Originally posted by Samarth 619 View PostBasically, frame rigidity can be a factor of frame thickness (at the thin-most points), the material strength, and its flexibility.
@ Prince: X+Y might make it rigid enough, but heavier & wider too. So, why not use a fatter "X" component alone only? A Strong material, which is light too, with negligible flex is what engineers hunt.
ya, i know that, i was just saying that X + Y will be more rigid than X alone.
i agree to the point mentioned by you above, i was only wondering - in doing so- whether- ducati has screwed the handling of bike along with lesser feedback
I remember when Desmosedici RR specs were released in 2007, it's chassis had a torsional rigidity of 4250 NM/degree, compared to 2300 NM/degree (or something) for 1098.
Although this chassis managed to be lighter than 1098's chassis, despite more rigidity (due to alloy involved probably), the swingarm had to be made 10% heavier for about 35% more stiffness.
Comment
-
Check again, its still Ducati.Originally posted by j4zb4 View PostSorry saar... But that tag belongs to the Augustas...
Agustas are anyway better than Ducati on street or on track, but the reason why its called Ferrari of Motorcycles is that they share a lot of technical expertiese which each other being located at the same place of the town Bologna, Italy and have a very good relation among themselves.
That's the reason that once ducati use to use the "prancing horse" are their logo, but due to ferrari fame, they change their logo.
More over there are loads of similarities between ducati and ferrari than ferrari and MV
You can cross check this on google.Last edited by R-series; 09-23-2011, 04:21 PM.Just because you haven't seen it doesnt mean its impossible...expect the unexpected.
Comment



Comment