Since '02 xBhp is different things to different people. From a close knit national community of bikers to India's only motorcycling lifestyle magazine and a place to make like-minded biker friends. Join us

Castrol Power 1

Be smooth with your gear shifts.

Our Partner

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

K&N Air Filter Queries and Doubts

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • theironhorse99
    replied
    Re: K&N Air Filter Queries and Doubts

    Originally posted by srinivas06884 View Post
    Can a k&n filter be fitted on to a discover 100 4g? If yes then what would be the cost. Advantages and disadvantages of fitting this filter on discover, cleaning frequency etc. How much pure air will pass into the engine

    Sent from my HTC Wildfire S A510e using Tapatalk 2

    yes you can however performance air filters are specifically mad for tracks not really for dusty conditions like India. also K&N is notoriously famous
    of letting in bigger size particles which on a long run will damage your engine. if you still want to go ahead do it however make sure you get the carb tuned
    accordingly a increased air flow will make your engine run lean and will get over heated. multiple cases of bust engines on a long trip known with k&N.


    Originally posted by wallpapers123 View Post
    Hi guys,
    need some help regarding buying a used(10000Kms) K&N KT-1211 Air Filter for my Duke 200. I haven't used any aftermarket filter till now, but wanted to install it since I'm also installing an IXIL Hyperlow exhaust.
    My query was, what exactly do we need to do in order to re use the Filter. I know there are some Recharger kits sold by K&N themselves, but there is some sort of a spray and oil.
    What exactly do they do?
    why would you want to buy a used air filter in first place ?
    also as you are adding a FFE the ECU wont be able to compensate 100% for the gain and exhaust geometry change. you will get the sound you want but not 100% of the performance gain. if you want to use a FFE + performance air filter then also all a ECU remap else piggyback ECU to enjoy the gains else it will be nothing more than extra sound.

    instead of K&N rather look for green , simota etc.


    by modding anything hopefully you understand the reliability of the machine also reduces. and if you haven't purchased the exhaust yet then rethink on your decision. a single cylinder street bike with a FFE won't be any better than a loud dirt bike.

    Leave a comment:


  • wallpapers123
    replied
    Re: K&N Air Filter Queries and Doubts

    Hi guys,
    need some help regarding buying a used(10000Kms) K&N KT-1211 Air Filter for my Duke 200. I haven't used any aftermarket filter till now, but wanted to install it since I'm also installing an IXIL Hyperlow exhaust.
    My query was, what exactly do we need to do in order to re use the Filter. I know there are some Recharger kits sold by K&N themselves, but there is some sort of a spray and oil.
    What exactly do they do?

    Leave a comment:


  • srinivas06884
    replied
    Re: K&N Air Filter Queries and Doubts

    Can a k&n filter be fitted on to a discover 100 4g? If yes then what would be the cost. Advantages and disadvantages of fitting this filter on discover, cleaning frequency etc. How much pure air will pass into the engine

    Sent from my HTC Wildfire S A510e using Tapatalk 2

    Leave a comment:


  • abhi7013
    replied
    Re: K&N Air Filter Queries and Doubts

    Originally posted by vvk1987 View Post
    My k&n experience:
    Old version honda dio

    I used to clean the air filter every 1500 kms due to dusty area. , As an experiment installed the k&n universal air filter & the experience was great .
    No more chocking of carburetor jets, good inteval for cleaning it approximately 2000km ,i just loved it

    Truly unbiased review.


    Sent from my SGH-I337M
    Good interval for cleaning? And you say dusty area? How much does honda charge for replacing the engine? I guess you will need one soon.
    You cannot have a look inside the engine can you? Cause if you could, you would throw the filter right away. Speaking out of experience. Not k&n but an even better brand.
    You say cleaning interval is 2000kms? Why? Cause there's no dirt on the filter right. That my friend is no reason to be happy. Be scared instead. Cause the dust simply goes into the cylinder. If your filter filtered perfectly, your cleaning intervals would would be pretty short cause dirt would accumulate on the filter. Common sense..

    Sent from my C5502 using xBhp Connect mobile app

    Leave a comment:


  • Anuj_Gupta
    replied
    Re: K&N Air Filter Queries and Doubts

    There is a reason why this equipment is termed as filter .,pls don't use k&n unless you're rich and can afford another bike/engine.

    Leave a comment:


  • vvk1987
    replied
    Re: K&N Air Filter Queries and Doubts

    My k&n experience:
    Old version honda dio

    I used to clean the air filter every 1500 kms due to dusty area. , As an experiment installed the k&n universal air filter & the experience was great .
    No more chocking of carburetor jets, good inteval for cleaning it approximately 2000km ,i just loved it

    Truly unbiased review.


    Sent from my SGH-I337M

    Leave a comment:


  • dustom_99
    replied
    Re: K&N Air Filter Queries and Doubts

    Originally posted by Giftonsamuel View Post
    Errr...
    Had two different theories now and me being a automobile engg student adds up to the confusion.

    And what I have seen is
    1. There is a roar if its a aftermarket filter .
    2. No big gain in power but bike feels more rev friendly .
    3.I think Fi engines can adjust itself with the new filter .
    4. If the exhaust of a TVs 50 is removed it can easily compete with a RE FFE .
    5. Primary source of noise will be after combustion so exhaust design plays vital in meeting earlier norms not sure what's now
    6.on seeing a RC 390 video sound was different from Dukes and everyone was saying its because of Air intakes position .


    )

    I thought the whole point of debate was if K&N lets through more dirt into the engine or not. That was the starting point.
    In the very first post I mentioned that lower restriction filters like K&N will allow engine to breath better / improve performance. But they do it by Virtue of larger size openings on their filtering surface Viz-a- Viz Oem Filters ( meaning they let through fine dust ).

    People who have to sell there stuff will not give a Clean answer. Never.
    They keep bringing in more and more parameters to the debate table , so that the whole thing becomes cluttered and debate takes a new direction instead of the Original question.
    Here is a link that should be given some thought.
    Lot of filters tested side by side and clearly K&N emerged as least restrictive but at the same time least efficient at actual filteration process.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	k&n.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	94.3 KB
ID:	1891923

    K&N Air Filter Review - Debunking the Myths (and why OEM is better)

    For racing they are fine , as the engine gets rebuilt very often anyway. but for average joe, K&N is a strict NO.

    ----consecutive posts auto-merged-----

    Click image for larger version

Name:	acc gain.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	59.1 KB
ID:	1891924

    See which filter passes How much dust into engine in an ISO 5011 standard test.

    ----consecutive posts auto-merged-----

    Originally posted by dustom_99 View Post
    .

    On there Official website K&N filters accepts that theirFilters are somewhere 96-99% efficient at capturing dust. That is : they let through 3% dust all the time. How much do you think 3% of dust entering an engine is?
    OEM paper filters filters like Delco / Purolator are 99.7% efficient on an average. while some filters going as much as 99.95% efficient.
    When you compare % of dust let through over a sample running size ( like 1000km or 500hrs at 300CFM air flow) K&N will let through about 1500times more dust into engine.

    Thats the reason OEM do not use them..all this sound theory is just a sham!

    here is a Screen shot from K&N official site:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	official K&N.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	101.2 KB
ID:	1891925

    Leave a comment:


  • Giftonsamuel
    replied
    Re: K&N Air Filter Queries and Doubts

    Errr...
    Had two different theories now and me being a automobile engg student adds up to the confusion.

    Am yet to experience anything but till now I know only this .
    1.air intake is positioned in such a way that it does not get in contact to surface water/dust easily .
    2. Suction is provided by vacuum created .


    And what I have seen is
    1. There is a roar if its a aftermarket filter .
    2. No big gain in power but bike feels more rev friendly .
    3.I think Fi engines can adjust itself with the new filter .
    4. If the exhaust of a TVs 50 is removed it can easily compete with a RE FFE .
    5. Primary source of noise will be after combustion so exhaust design plays vital in meeting earlier norms not sure what's now
    6.on seeing a RC 390 video sound was different from Dukes and everyone was saying its because of Air intakes position .


    IMHO Aftermarket filter are for the guys who have changed to FFE ,remapped the ecu and may be some other performance mods .Just a filter doesn't contribute much for its price .
    Also for the dust part yeah there must be some small compromise even if its a stock replacement filter but then maintaining it regularly as with any mod stuff will keep it good conditions.


    Please post more of your different views so that we inexperienced guys can learn and even its opposite to the other persons view in the end we get the pros & cons .(will definitely research on that Bernoulli part as I have fluid mech exam still bending )

    Leave a comment:


  • sniper
    replied
    Re: K&N Air Filter Queries and Doubts

    This is me signing off from this discussion. All the best to you.

    Leave a comment:


  • sniper
    replied
    Most of us learnt Bernoulli's theorem, pinching the pipe end while watering plants and washing our cars. I never disputed the fact that Mr. Bernoulli is responsible for better intakes among lots of other things. But, by using your infinite wisdom and bag full of theorems could you explain why a bike's engine (e.g. in a Yamaha R15) produces more power with a stock filter after removal of air box cover of the highly researched designer intake whose sole job is to actually improve airflow as per your research papers? You are taking it the wrong way. Don't let your ego cloud your judgement. I don't dispute the fact that modern intakes are purpose built to improve effciency. Its also a fact that compromises have to be made in the design to stay within pollution norms such as noise reducing design of intakes (not the intake section between the airbox and engine, obviously), muffled exhausts and EGRs to reduce NOX emmissions. Go back to school, u have a long way to go.

    Leave a comment:


  • dustom_99
    replied
    Re: K&N Air Filter Queries and Doubts

    Originally posted by sniper View Post
    In your enthusiasm to prove your point, you didn't read my post right. The intake of any vehicle is designed in such a way so that it reduces intake noise. Thats why the intakes don't make noise. In fact if you increase the diameter and straighten the path of the air intake upto the air filter, noise will increase. Thats a fact, try it, one doesn't need to be a 15 yr veteran or a research manager to figure that out, just some elbow grease. Regarding the warranty on my work, will a manufacturer give a warranty for his stock engine with the stock filter, if he knows, it will be used for racing around on the street or race track?
    That what you have learned ?
    Intake runner dia/ surface finish / length / material et all are designed to provide desired velocity & pressure to intake charge , so that air can rush into cylinder in very limited time available between valve opening and closing , not reduce noise.
    Thats simple application of Bernoulli's theorem. Increase in speed of fluid will be accompanied by reduction of pressure and vice-versa.
    It has absolutely nothing to do with intake noise.
    Its has all to do with where the designers want there maximum cylinder fill efficiency. Using Bernoulli principle.. Ohh wait , no need to google it now or refer your college books to find out.



    You should have learned that in automobile engg , didn't you?

    Now that you say the intake is designed to reduce noise , isn't the path clear for oem to use FF filters. They would not have trouble with govt norms.
    Or may be oem with million dollar facilities could not come up with an intake that uses K&n and not make noise enough to go against rules.( which they any way do not make , even without a filter anyway).

    I don't have time to give you engineering tuition now. You can go back to selling your filters and i would take care of my work.

    You still did not tell me which vehicle makes so loud that it doesn't qualify on sound pollution norms . that was the starting post i guess

    Leave a comment:


  • sniper
    replied
    In your enthusiasm to prove your point, you didn't read my post right. The intake of any vehicle is designed in such a way so that it reduces intake noise. Thats why the intakes don't make noise. Take off the air filter cover, rev the engine a bit and you can measure and hear what intake noise is. In fact if you increase the diameter and straighten the path of the air intake upto the air filter, noise will increase. Thats a fact, try it, one doesn't need to be a 15 yr veteran or a research manager to figure that out, just some elbow grease. Regarding the warranty on my work, will a manufacturer give a warranty for his stock engine with the stock filter, if he knows, it will be used for racing around on the street or race track?
    Last edited by sniper; 10-09-2014, 09:27 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • dustom_99
    replied
    Re: K&N Air Filter Queries and Doubts

    Originally posted by sniper View Post
    My theories are based on facts which I have learnt from 15 years of being an automotive engineer, mechanic, performance tuner, etc. What is your field of expertise?
    Mine is research manager ( vehicle engineering) for OEM car manufacturer.
    15years of selling filters and you did not learn how much noise intake makes?
    Since you have 15 yrs experience of tuning , why don't you launch a engine warranty program for the vehicles you send out with free flow ones.
    By the way why did you care to mention your experience? I merely asked which automobile makes intake noise loud enough to infringe with sound pollution norms?

    Leave a comment:


  • sniper
    replied
    My theories are based on facts which I have learnt from 15 years of being an automotive engineer, mechanic, performance tuner, etc. What is your field of expertise?

    Leave a comment:


  • dustom_99
    replied
    Re: K&N Air Filter Queries and Doubts

    Originally posted by sniper View Post
    Stock filters have an additional task besides that of filteration. Its reducing the intake noise caused by the movement of air rushing into the engine. This is achieved by making the intake pipes narrow and using extremely fine filtration material which literally chokes the engine from producing more power and giving better fuel efficiency for the sake of the Noise Pollution norms. If not for these norms, companies would have sold cars/ bikes with factory fitted FFFs. FFF manufacturers have their filteration test data on their websites just like the 'independent researchers' do, both are equally believable. Only difference is that there is more at stake for the manufacturers who can be sued for their claims. We just believe the one we WANT to believe in..
    Hehe! Who gave you that theory? Reducing intake noise! Thats a first. You trying to tell me that intake noise is more than 80db limit for most automobiles. And which automobile will that be?
    Most of the guys here would have driven around without filter at some point of time , they can decide for themselves if intake sound it loud enough to infringe with govt sound norms.
    They(oem) provide extremely fine filtration , but they quote there power figure with same fine filter too and provide warranty aswell .
    Fff manufacturers provide performance data but they never tell you how much they are not catching as compared to oem filter.
    I would recommend fff to everyone if filter manufacturer can cover engine warranty or cost of repair along with performance.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X