Since '02 xBhp is different things to different people. From a close knit national community of bikers to India's only motorcycling lifestyle magazine and a place to make like-minded biker friends. Join us

Castrol Power 1

The slower the vehicle, the quicker it can turn.

Our Partner

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Honda launches 6 new bikes including CBR500R, CB500X, and CB500F

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • shv18
    replied
    I agree with Aargee. CBR is a good product.. in between troubled by a lot of spares and after sales service problems but slowly Honda is taking care of it. Besides a lot of riders have dedicatedly done long distance touring and it has turned out to be quite a workhorse.

    I am personally looking forward to CBR500R that ofcourse if at all it is launched in India. 500X is indeed unique! I believe seeing physically will make it a lot easier for a lot of people to decide.

    If Honda prices it right they really have a good product in their hands. Honda Parallel twins are one of the best engines across other platform.


    Cheers,

    Leave a comment:


  • Satellite.kid
    replied
    "Built to a cost", "meant to be an economical ride" are phrases that attract varied opinions. More often than not such motorcycles are mostly ridiculed by self-proclaimed enthusiasts who are only (supposedly) concerned with the lovely term called performance! Where and how do you put a benchmark on performance for different types of motorcycles? I don't think it's easy.

    My (so called) analysis tells me that the biggest trouble, mostly, with such motorcycles is LOOKS. Because the real world performance often turns out to be more than acceptable in varied riding conditions. As far as I am concerned, the biggest or the only problem I see with these new 500s is the wet weight. But I definitely won't fire a judgement cannon on the performance and definitely not on the quality of the motorcycles. Not yet. If any of these motorcycles is launched in India with a competitive price tag then Bajaj/Kawasaki will have a hard time selling Ninja 650. Ninja 650 with its slightly bigger engine and slightly more power weighs 211 kgs. So I am not sure if 192 kgs for a CBR500R is bad. Alteast for me, CBR500R looks better than a Ninja650 and this is where the competition will be for these 500cc Hondas.

    Yes, the newly announced Duke 390 is a total drool maal for anyone who wants to burn the rubber (and probably with a mouth watering price tag). But then, I believe, this is only what KTM knows and makes. The Austrian is not as varied as its Japanese counterpart and whether it's good or bad for either of these manufacturers is a matter of opinion. KTM will never make an alternative for something like Ninja 650, but Honda can and I believe this is what they are trying to do here. Because Honda's CBR600F is still a quite premium motorcycle in its class. As I tried to imply in one of my earlier posts, these 500s would be great in India for a two-up touring with a satisfying performance while not being scarily expensive.

    Leave a comment:


  • aargee
    replied
    Originally posted by abhi_underdog View Post
    However, I strongly believe that 500x would be a success if its indeed what its made to look like and the cbr600rr looks disgusting. What do you say?
    I've no say; I DO NOT expect anyone to say Jai Honda slogan; all I was stressing is Praful's point "It's not as bad as what is being portrayed here". Please take sometime, search for the CBR 250R launch thread & read those posts. It's quite hilarious to see the speculations of people now.

    Reading all those points at that point almost made me to cancel my CBR booking; but after owning the product for quite sometime now, I believe it would've been a nonsense decision on my part.

    That is precisely why I suggest a MEANINGFUL discussion here, otherwise, there's seldom difference between xBhp & the FB groups.

    I hope you get my point

    Leave a comment:


  • abhi_underdog
    replied
    Originally posted by aargee
    I wish you don't poke your...unnecessary!!!


    Your unnecessary posts


    [/B]
    Sorry Sir, i lost my mind for a while. Please ignore what I said in the above posts. However, I strongly believe that 500x would be a success if its indeed what its made to look like and the cbr600rr looks disgusting. What do you say?

    Leave a comment:


  • Ezilkannan
    replied
    If the CBR 500R is priced somewhere between 2.5~3L I would most definitely prefer it over D390. But like aargee said, its better to wait and see if its ever going to come into Indian markets and then decide on it, rather than speculating.

    Leave a comment:


  • antz.bin
    replied
    Originally posted by kochumvk View Post
    So , Duke 390 will not qualify for A2 License even if weighs 200kg!
    Well technically, that particular source is not the official source. Just a guideline.

    EU regulations don't have any minimum/maximum displacement limitation.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ezilkannan
    replied
    Originally posted by antz.bin View Post
    Lets just say that the 200NS increased the weight to provide more stability at high speeds. Ended up selling for 30% less than Duke .
    That shows the kind of enthusiasts that we have here in India. I too had a dilemma to decide between CBR 250 R and Duke and the only reason I thought of picking the CBR is due to its ABS. Now that Duke has decided to release its own ABS variants and the D390 for a price close to the CBR 250, I've decided to wait for it .
    Originally posted by kochumvk View Post
    So , Duke 390 will not qualify for A2 License even if weighs 200kg!
    Well technically, yes.

    Leave a comment:


  • kochumvk
    replied
    Originally posted by antz.bin View Post
    I am not talking about LAMS. I am talking about the EU, a much bigger market than Australia.

    This is not an official source but gives a general idea about the new norms coming into force in UK in about 2 months from now.

    New Motorcycle Licence Categories and restrictions from 19th January 2013.
    Must be a solo motorcycle with a capacity of at least 395cc

    So , Duke 390 will not qualify for A2 License even if weighs 200kg!


    Originally posted by aargee View Post
    KTM bought better technology? Wow...a rebored 125cc cylinder? Inverted fork that keeps leaking? Alloy wheels that keep breaking on high run over potholes?
    PS - Can you think of any reason as why KTM's 40+ odd percent was sold to BAL?
    .
    Every bike have its share of problems, especially when newly developed. A light Alloy wheel is not as strong as the heavy one (just like the FZ's). We cannot say Duke 390 is superior in tech especially when the CBR 500 got a pair of cylinders. But The frame, Swing arm, forks are superior, and the craftsmanship all are better on duke I think. And the price thats coming is based on how economically they make it including Rand D. Honda cannot match BAL in terms of profit margin per piece at present. So Honda are costlier. That does not mean that one is superior or inferior. All; said I will pick 500X over a duke 390 if service and spares are cleanly available and if price difference is not toooo much.


    BAL bought the stakes in very progressive stages over few years to reach 47. But I am curious to know the story behind the game.
    Last edited by kochumvk; 11-15-2012, 04:43 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • antz.bin
    replied
    Originally posted by Ezilkannan View Post
    Hmm that makes sense, but still, I too wonder why Honda prefers to be within the 150 kW/ton range. Are they increasing the weights just to provide more stability at high speeds?
    Lets just say that the 200NS increased the weight to provide more stability at high speeds. Ended up selling for 30% less than Duke .

    Leave a comment:


  • Ezilkannan
    replied
    Originally posted by antz.bin View Post
    I am not talking about LAMS. I am talking about the EU, a much bigger market than Australia.

    This is not an official source but gives a general idea about the new norms coming into force in UK in about 2 months from now.

    New Motorcycle Licence Categories and restrictions from 19th January 2013.
    Hmm that makes sense, but still, I too wonder why Honda prefers to be within the 150 kW/ton range. Are they increasing the weights just to provide more stability at high speeds?

    Leave a comment:


  • antz.bin
    replied
    Originally posted by Ezilkannan View Post
    Are you sure about the 200kW/ton part? When I checked last time, the LAMS doesn't allow anything over 150kW/t.
    I am not talking about LAMS. I am talking about the EU, a much bigger market than Australia.

    This is not an official source but gives a general idea about the new norms coming into force in UK in about 2 months from now.

    New Motorcycle Licence Categories and restrictions from 19th January 2013.

    Leave a comment:


  • sambit
    replied
    I dont care whether I like it or not. But I would prefer,Honda launching somthing,than not launching anything. So just bring it on. And a price tag of 3L for non abs,is justifiable. Honda must have realized the upcoming KTM onslaught in 2013. It will definitely bring these bikes to India next year. And most importantly,the naked wont work in India,as long there is DUKE. So they should give all the priorities to the other 2. Would be a good upgrade from Impulse and CBR250 respectively.
    But aye,we need a naked 250 though.

    Leave a comment:


  • kochumvk
    replied
    Ok XBHP is becoming very colorful with thick colorful typography these days. Maybe Deepavali special but as the thickness goes up its not very interesting.

    on the bike: Multistranda replica looks very very good. That is the kind of bike we don't have and we need badly. Yeah of course I am not asking for Skyhook or semi active suspension and very advanced electronics.
    Repeating at 3.5 L this will be a great buy. What is bad is HMSI's approach towards serious bikers. And localization. Need to see how HMSI will handle twins. (May be they will do the job in the plant where the V-Techs are made).

    Any way I don't think all of these lineup will reach our shores. If its a CKD, may pale against upcoming bajaj offers. Else it will definitely see decent numbers in sales.

    Problem is that Hondas profit margin is not as good as Bajaj's so they are busy making scooters for India(which sells in thousands every month).

    Leave a comment:


  • Ezilkannan
    replied
    Originally posted by antz.bin View Post
    There are a couple of discrepancies in Honda's/Your calculations which I would like you to clarify.

    1. I googled 'LAMS regulation in EU'. I got 'Light Aircraft Maintenance Schedule' in EU. Obviously either me or you have gone wrong somewhere. Kindly correct me (if applicable).
    2. If you look at post #41 on this very thread (my post from earlier today), you would see that License category A2 allows for maximum of 35Kw(OR 47bhp). Whereas in your calculations you have considered 40 Kw which would clearly move them out of a virgin segment (they were supposedly targeting with these bikes).
    3. As per this page : 2013 CB500F Specifications - Honda Powersports Honda CB500F weighs 420 lbs (OR 190.5 kg by simple conversion. ABS version weighs 424 lbs) whereas in your calculations, you have considered 180kg.
    4. Why would Honda do all this weight gain to reduce the power to weight ratio to under 150 kw/ton when the regulation clearly allows for 0.2kw/kg OR 200kw/ton ?

    My point from earlier was, neither KTM nor Honda nor Kawasaki nor the others who will make bikes for this new segment of buyers is going to make a lot of money by selling just A2 bikes. Real margins lie on the bigger bikes. A2 is an opportunity for each manufacturer to send home a clear message to the learners about what to expect from the bigger bikes if they happen to upgrade within their stable.

    P.S.: Tare Weight is something very different from Kerb weight.
    Are you sure about the 200kW/ton part? When I checked last time, the LAMS doesn't allow anything over 150kW/t.

    Leave a comment:


  • jollyroger81
    replied
    Originally posted by Nithesh View Post
    1) MY bad. Its AU not EU (Aus not Europe)

    5) Answer me this: When was the last time any manufacturer introduced a major upgrade in that class? Major as in a completely new bike from scratch R&D and not just upgrading existing models.
    In this day and age, there are few developments in any field where anything is developed from scratch. Automotive engineering has matured over the last 3 decades and products are updated only incrementally, so I dont think this is a realistic expectation. If the CB500 series performs as expected (good performance with reasonable economy, easy driveability, reliability which is its USP) then we should be satisfied. I like the fact that they have chosen to release the same platform in 3 flavours (naked, sport and adventure) where there is choice for the consumer (assuming it will come to India).

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X