Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
ZMA Vs Apache RTR180
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
i just want to know the reason why you excluded P220 F ?Originally posted by amit_purohit20 View PostI am getting a ZMA and RTR180 onspot delivery.Now please help me choose between the two.I am not interested in other bikes.I am 82kg 5foot 7 inches.
both of the bikes will be good for you. P220 will satisfy this need too.Originally posted by amit_purohit20 View Post1)I dont drive beyond 80 kms/hr.
Zma for going to leh.Originally posted by amit_purohit20 View Post2)Bike will be used to go to Leh and then afterwards to drive within and around Pune(Total 600 kms return journey)
you can get lehied on an RTR too and DEFINITELY on a P220 also.
Zma best in this case.Originally posted by amit_purohit20 View Post3)I am only worried about the Seating position of Apache and pillion comfort for long drives.If the difference in pillion and driver comfort is not much between Apache and Zma then I can go for Apache with some compromise.
Apache has a sporty posture for rider. pillion comfort is edgy.
P220 semi sporty posture for the rider. pillion comfort better than apache AFAIK but not Zma.
parts availability is decent for all three.Originally posted by amit_purohit20 View Post4)What about parts availability of Apache and ZMA.
its still expensive albeit some would say Quality matters.Originally posted by amit_purohit20 View Post5)Has the cost of ZMA parts come down or its still rocket high?
bajaj spares are very cheap.
apache RTR and P220Originally posted by amit_purohit20 View Post6)Which has more adrenaline rush upto 80 kms/hr?Apache RTR180 or ZMA?
P220 also includes above mentioned goodies.Originally posted by amit_purohit20 View Post7)I am tempted for Apache due to Rear Disc and tubeless tyres.Also the spare parts are less expensive.Better fuel efficiency.It has no fairing which is good for me.The only thing which I dont like is the seating position and space for pillion.If these are serious factors then I would go for ZMA otherwise ZMA.
and RTR too boosts all this.
YES you can tour on Apache without any fuss.Originally posted by amit_purohit20 View PostI have seen many people tour on Apache 180 also so confused.I would keep this vehicle for long term at least coming 7 years (if it lasts
)
but if you want to keep it for 7 years..... think only about ZMA R.
i have also included P220 in your list just to tell you that it fullfill all your needs hands down minus last one.Originally posted by amit_purohit20 View PostPlease suggest fast.I would be booking the bike in next one or two days.
Thanks for all your inputs.
regards,
Amit
if you hate P220 that much then dont read those words of mine on P220.
happy buying.
2003 - 2009 : Pulsar 150 Classic (Sold)
2009 - Present : Pulsar 220 Dtsi
2009 - Present : Honda Activa
2016 - Present : KTM Duke 390
Comment
-
if you tour a lot and want to keep the bike for a very long time, just go for ZMA eyes closed
but if your heart beats a lot for Apache, then better go for it
regarding the spares, yes the spares of ZMA are costly, but if the bike is maintained properly and if you make sure the bike doesnt fall then you wont require spareskarizmatic
Comment
-
Thankyou XBHP guys!!!
A big Thankyou to all of you guys who have given there valuable suggestions.
Yesterday I had a good test drive of Apache RTR180 after I had driven ZMA and got lot of my doubts cleared.
My observations:
1)Initial Pickup of RTR cant be matched by ZMA. ZMA just dosent get the adrenaline pumping.(I am already 32 and people say that I should settle for commuterish bikes but I wonder why my heart still beats for the Adrenaline Rush.)Although on paper both ZMA and RTR give the same power (Not torque) but in real world the way the RTR gives power is like a sudden Turbo boost.It makes me really happy.
2)Although Apache seating position is a bit cramped and "racist" in nature but the body bend required to reach the clip ons is not much.Its only a bit more than ZMA.I was used to driving a victor with my spine straight so any bend in my spine I can feel it strongly.
3)RTR brakes are way ahead of ZMA.
4)Pillion seating is poor even poor than my Victor.ZMA scores high on this.
Finally I have chosen RTR180 for the following reasons:
1)Adrenaline rush is the main reason why I love this machine.I have a 7 year old Victor and I have been complaining from ages about the poor pickup and lack of power.
2)After driving the bike for a while I felt I can adapt to the sporty seating position.
3)About poor pillion seating position I analysed that I would be rarely going double seat for very long drives.
4)I also complained a lot about Victors pathetic drum brakes not at all confidence inspiring. And RTR's brakes were perfect as per my requirement.Sharp braking giving me confidence.Although many people like the modulated type of braking feel.I prefer the sharp de acceleration feel.
5)Other advantages include:Less plastics as compared to ZMA,Rs7000 cheaper in Pune,Good cornering characteristics,Tubeless tyres,Rear disc brakes,Cheaper spare parts and better availability.
6)Regarding reliability of Apache RTR180 and for long term use.I have used my Victor for last 7 years without a single part change.Front drum brake shoe is still the original
.I have not replaced a single cable.After 7 years I did replace the rear wheel bearing and the front shock absorber oil seal bcoz I love a bit offroading
.Thats all..
.So with that trust on TVS I go forward lets see..
Not forgetting to Thankyou all for all your valuable suggestions. Xbhpians Rock!!!
I am going to book RTR180 -White today! Any things to check ,to take care of..please suggest. I need to run this at least 2000kms in a month to go to LEH in July End.Last edited by amit_purohit20; 06-24-2010, 03:23 PM.
Comment
-
congo on ur decision....just make sure the there are no scratches on bike before taking delivery, and just 1000km running in is required not 2000.Originally posted by amit_purohit20 View PostA big Thankyou to all of you guys who have given there valuable suggestions.
Yesterday I had a good test drive of Apache RTR180 after I had driven ZMA and got lot of my doubts cleared.
My observations:
1)Initial Pickup of RTR cant be matched by ZMA. ZMA just dosent get the adrenaline pumping.(I am already 32 and people say that I should settle for commuterish bikes but I wonder why my heart still beats for the Adrenaline Rush.)Although on paper both ZMA and RTR give the same power (Not torque) but in real world the way the RTR gives power is like a sudden Turbo boost.It makes me really happy.
2)Although Apache seating position is a bit cramped and "racist" in nature but the body bend required to reach the clip ons is not much.Its only a bit more than ZMA.I was used to driving a victor with my spine straight so any bend in my spine I can feel it strongly.
3)RTR brakes are way ahead of ZMA.
4)Pillion seating is poor even poor than my Victor.ZMA scores high on this.
Finally I have chosen RTR180 for the following reasons:
1)Adrenaline rush is the main reason why I love this machine.I have a 7 year old Victor and I have been complaining from ages about the poor pickup and lack of power.
2)After driving the bike for a while I felt I can adapt to the sporty seating position.
3)About poor pillion seating position I analysed that I would be rarely going double seat for very long drives.
4)I also complained a lot about Victors pathetic drum brakes not at all confidence inspiring. And RTR's brakes were perfect as per my requirement.Sharp braking giving me confidence.Although many people like the modulated type of braking feel.I prefer the sharp de acceleration feel.
5)Other advantages include:Less plastics as compared to ZMA,Rs7000 cheaper in Pune,Good cornering characteristics,Tubeless tyres,Rear disc brakes,Cheaper spare parts and better availability.
6)Regarding reliability of Apache RTR180 and for long term use.I have used my Victor for last 7 years without a single part change.Front drum brake shoe is still the original
.I have not replaced a single cable.After 7 years I did replace the rear wheel bearing and the front shock absorber oil seal bcoz I love a bit offroading
.Thats all..
.So with that trust on TVS I go forward lets see..
Not forgetting to Thankyou all for all your valuable suggestions. Xbhpians Rock!!!
I am going to book RTR180 -White today! Any things to check ,to take care of..please suggest. I need to run this at least 2000kms in a month to go to LEH in July End."Biking is Divine"
All Karizma Owners Connect With Each Other On the Karizma Group on facebook
https://www.facebook.com/groups/HeroHondaKarizma
https://www.facebook.com/AnmolSharmaPhotography
https://www.facebook.com/ThinkDigitall
http://anmolksharma.blogspot.in/
Comment
-
pls tell me from where you test drived the two vehicles[from showroom or from a friend]. how much old is the karizma and apache u tested ?? u said that rtr pick up is greater than zma as you felt, in my opinion it could be due to the fact that karizma u test ride may be older with worn clutch plates, bad spark plug etc.???Originally posted by amit_purohit20 View PostA big Thankyou to all of you guys who have given there valuable suggestions.
Yesterday I had a good test drive of Apache RTR180 after I had driven ZMA and got lot of my doubts cleared.
My observations:
1)Initial Pickup of RTR cant be matched by ZMA. ZMA just dosent get the adrenaline pumping.(I am already 32 and people say that I should settle for commuterish bikes but I wonder why my heart still beats for the Adrenaline Rush.)Although on paper both ZMA and RTR give the same power (Not torque) but in real world the way the RTR gives power is like a sudden Turbo boost.It makes me really happy.
Comment
-
RTR is faster than a Karizma till the 0-100 dash,Originally posted by KARIZMATIC View Postpls tell me from where you test drived the two vehicles[from showroom or from a friend]. how much old is the karizma and apache u tested ?? u said that rtr pick up is greater than zma as you felt, in my opinion it could be due to the fact that karizma u test ride may be older with worn clutch plates, bad spark plug etc.???
but these all things are relative and hardly matter on road, be sensible, ride safe.
How many kms has your Karizma clocked?Originally posted by KARIZMATIC View Postzma spares last long compared to others.
i had to change my valves when my bike did just 14K and she was on a very strict diet of Speed from BP and had oil changes(Power 1) at every 1 K. pls don't get me started on plastics.
@amit--glad you didn't mention, you are 32 years old,
you are 32 years young.
good choice.
Last edited by sheelpriye; 06-24-2010, 04:08 PM.
Comment
-
my zma is 23k old and is stock nothing changed except engine oil.Originally posted by sheelpriye View PostRTR is faster than a Karizma till the 0-100 dash,
but these all things are relative and hardly matter on road, be sensible, ride safe.
How many kms has your Karizma clocked?
@amit--glad you didn't mention, you are 32 years old,
you are 32 years young.
good choice.
Comment
-
RTR all the way if ur OK with the riding position for long rides. Itcan kick butt for more than 7 years if u keep it well.Originally posted by amit_purohit20 View PostI am getting a ZMA and RTR180 onspot delivery.Now please help me choose between the two.I am not interested in other bikes.I am 82kg 5foot 7 inches.
1)I dont drive beyond 80 kms/hr.
2)Bike will be used to go to Leh and then afterwards to drive within and around Pune(Total 600 kms return journey)
3)I am only worried about the Seating position of Apache and pillion comfort for long drives.If the difference in pillion and driver comfort is not much between Apache and Zma then I can go for Apache with some compromise.
4)What about parts availability of Apache and ZMA.
5)Has the cost of ZMA parts come down or its still rocket high?
6)Which has more adrenaline rush upto 80 kms/hr?Apache RTR180 or ZMA?
7)I am tempted for Apache due to Rear Disc and tubeless tyres.Also the spare parts are less expensive.Better fuel efficiency.It has no fairing which is good for me.The only thing which I dont like is the seating position and space for pillion.If these are serious factors then I would go for ZMA otherwise ZMA.
I have seen many people tour on Apache 180 also so confused.I would keep this vehicle for long term at least coming 7 years (if it lasts
)
Please suggest fast.I would be booking the bike in next one or two days.
Thanks for all your inputs.
regards,
Amit
Man u will really enjoy it in ghats
. Only bike than can give u wider smile in corners is R15.
Originally posted by KARIZMATIC View Postzma spares last long compared to others.
Really? How long u think 2300rupee disk pads last more than a 200 rupee disk pads?
and how "strong" u think that tail peace is?
Street racing is for Squids trying to make up for their small equipment
Comment
-
Originally posted by KARIZMATIC View Postpls tell me from where you test drived the two vehicles[from showroom or from a friend]. how much old is the karizma and apache u tested ?? u said that rtr pick up is greater than zma as you felt, in my opinion it could be due to the fact that karizma u test ride may be older with worn clutch plates, bad spark plug etc.???
Dude its a long established fact that rtr 180 is the fastest accelerating bike in the country. So ther's absolutely no way a stock karizma even the best maintained one could "out- accelerate " an apache 180
@Thread Starter - great choice congrats , you're going to love your choice the moment you show it some twistiesrespect ma authoritae!!
sigpic
- 2006 Pulsar 180 dtsi
- 2011 r15 V 2.0
Comment




Comment