But your logic is flawed! Firstly you are comparing the 650N to the Er6'F' whilst the GT650'R' is still sold. Comparing different products is wrong!
Secondly the price difference is no where near 2L
GT650N - 4.7L (BLR Pricing as of yesterday)
N650 - 5.8L (rumored 2012 pricing)
Consider the *hypothetical* situation that the Er6N is sold, you have to agree that it would retail at at least 50-60K cheaper !!
Now tell me you "won't" consider the Er6N when it is barely 50k or 10% more cost wise over the GT650N ?
PS: I don't own either bike so have nothing for/against them

PS:PS: the issues with the N250 is a batch issue for a certain set of bikes, all bikes aren't affected by it... and pray tell if there are any other 'real' issues with that bike which has over 28 years of evolution!!!


Or if you want a naked, then the GT650N would work nicely. For just about every other scenario, I'm sure the Ninja would be the better choice for most folks.


Comment