Since '02 xBhp is different things to different people. From a close knit national community of bikers to India's only motorcycling lifestyle magazine and a place to make like-minded biker friends. Join us

Castrol Power 1

Work on your panic braking skills.

Our Partner

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bajaj Pulsar 200 NS: Long Term Test Review

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • surojit
    replied
    Originally posted by techspl View Post
    Completed the runnin period of 450 kms, as per limitations, never exceeded speed 0f 55kph, driving was a mixed bag, a combi of city and highway rides, a good amount of peak hour traffic, 15 signals on the route, frequest stops, and also long high way runs of 40 kms. Filled the tank to BRIM on delivery, reset the trip to zero. on 550 kms , i topped up again to the brim, it took 10.74 litre, at the same pump , same nozzle. That gave me effective economy of: 550kms / 10.74 litre = that is 51.21 ( absolutely fantastic for a 200 monster), but the ride was economic never exceded 55kph, now need to test on next refill. will keep you guys updated. First service was done oil changed, pretty costly oil at 470/-,now it is bajaj genuine 20-50, 10,000 kms oil. by HP. and some miscellenous charge of 24 rs for putting gelly for battery contacts. Added the MAIN stand( now available), for 530 + 100 service + taxes amounting to total of Rs. 650/-, replaced a faulty nut of the front seat that was just rotating , no cost. Till now a great experience will keep posting further... till then ...
    Dude run-in period is 2000 kms not 450. 450 is the first service time...

    Leave a comment:


  • Nhojv
    replied
    Originally posted by techspl View Post
    Completed the runnin period of 450 kms, as per limitations, never exceeded speed 0f 55kph, driving was a mixed bag, a combi of city and highway rides, a good amount of peak hour traffic, 15 signals on the route, frequest stops, and also long high way runs of 40 kms. Filled the tank to BRIM on delivery, reset the trip to zero. on 550 kms , i topped up again to the brim, it took 10.74 litre, at the same pump , same nozzle. That gave me effective economy of: 550kms / 10.74 litre = that is 51.21 ( absolutely fantastic for a 200 monster), but the ride was economic never exceded 55kph, now need to test on next refill. will keep you guys updated. First service was done oil changed, pretty costly oil at 470/-,now it is bajaj genuine 20-50, 10,000 kms oil. by HP. and some miscellenous charge of 24 rs for putting gelly for battery contacts. Added the MAIN stand( now available), for 530 + 100 service + taxes amounting to total of Rs. 650/-, replaced a faulty nut of the front seat that was just rotating , no cost. Till now a great experience will keep posting further... till then ...
    Good to hear positive comments. And the mileage under sane driving conditions look really good. Way beyond what anyone reported so far.wonder why the service costs vary from place to place. I think what others have posted in ownership thread might be different.way t go man. Happy Miles ahead. Keep the feedback coming

    Sent from my SHV-E120L using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • techspl
    replied
    pulsar 200 ns first 550 kms report

    Completed the runnin period of 450 kms, as per limitations, never exceeded speed 0f 55kph, driving was a mixed bag, a combi of city and highway rides, a good amount of peak hour traffic, 15 signals on the route, frequest stops, and also long high way runs of 40 kms. Filled the tank to BRIM on delivery, reset the trip to zero. on 550 kms , i topped up again to the brim, it took 10.74 litre, at the same pump , same nozzle. That gave me effective economy of: 550kms / 10.74 litre = that is 51.21 ( absolutely fantastic for a 200 monster), but the ride was economic never exceded 55kph, now need to test on next refill. will keep you guys updated. First service was done oil changed, pretty costly oil at 470/-,now it is bajaj genuine 20-50, 10,000 kms oil. by HP. and some miscellenous charge of 24 rs for putting gelly for battery contacts. Added the MAIN stand( now available), for 530 + 100 service + taxes amounting to total of Rs. 650/-, replaced a faulty nut of the front seat that was just rotating , no cost. Till now a great experience will keep posting further... till then ...

    Leave a comment:


  • Nhojv
    replied
    Originally posted by J K View Post
    Yup...!! Today @ 10.30 in Cochin.
    Following is the quote I received from a dealer in kerala.
    Ex Show Room 86315
    Insurance 1797
    Tax + Reg 5880
    Total 93992,

    @jk and others while are going to the launch ceremony, eagerly awaiting your description


    Sent from my SHV-E120L using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • J K
    replied
    Originally posted by Ivin View Post
    In kerala too..
    Yup...!! Today @ 10.30 in Cochin.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ivin
    replied
    Originally posted by sunilg View Post
    Pulsar 200NS is being launched in Tamilnadu today for Rs.86,936/- ex-showroom...
    In kerala too..

    Leave a comment:


  • sunilg
    replied
    Pulsar 200NS is being launched in Tamilnadu today for Rs.86,936/- ex-showroom...

    Leave a comment:


  • eliksir
    replied
    Originally posted by yash3 View Post
    Yes the P220 fi has the most Accurate speedo , Even the ZMR too , its even more Accurate than fi220 !

    Leave a comment:


  • yash3
    replied
    Originally posted by MG View Post
    I clearly mentioned it to be a speedo indicated speed. All the manufacturers are allowed to keep a 10% error in their speedo so you will see people claiming 150 on R15 and 150+ on P220. P220Fi had the most accurate speedo indication till date.

    Yes the P220 fi has the most Accurate speedo , Even the ZMR too , its even more Accurate than fi220 !


    very well write up and Awesome Pics

    Clear View on pros and cons

    Leave a comment:


  • Shibadip
    replied
    Originally posted by rahuldevnath View Post
    Are you sure? It's the other way round. Both saddle height and ground clearance is more on off-roaders. Lesser height is desirable for cornering and not exactly off roading.
    Ya, man guess you are right. In fact I saw a program on NGC today about Ducati Transformer bike(dont recall the exact name) and there also somewhere it was said that the saddle height is kept more for better off-roading purpose!

    Leave a comment:


  • rahuldevnath
    replied
    Originally posted by Shibadip View Post
    @ rahul- higher saddle height, means higher Center of gravity. There by making it a bit difficult to balance the bike while off-roading.
    Are you sure? It's the other way round. Both saddle height and ground clearance is more on off-roaders. Lesser height is desirable for cornering and not exactly off roading.
    Last edited by rahuldevnath; 07-08-2012, 12:39 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Shibadip
    replied
    Originally posted by rahuldevnath View Post
    Well, I do understand that the suspension on 200 is stiffer, but at the same time it's also lighter, has a higher saddle height, better suspension and does not have the faring. That's why I was wondering given that the 200Ns with it's mono suspension is much better on track, should also be as good if not better than 220 in off roading!
    @ rahul- higher saddle height, means higher Center of gravity. There by making it a bit difficult to balance the bike while off-roading.

    Leave a comment:


  • rahuldevnath
    replied
    Originally posted by Akash.Yadav View Post
    @rahuldevnath : it can be because of its flexi chassis and softer suspension that P220 is found tobe better off roader than P200NS. P200NS' chassis is the renowned perimeter frame (please correct me if I am wrong) which is lighter in weight and very strong. This characteristic helps in retaining the cornering ability of the bike. Certainly enough, @MG sir would have told that P200NS is a better track tool than P220.

    Both chassis and suspension add to the character of the bike a lot. personal opinion, I find it a bit difficult to corner in my P150 but find it relatively easy on Apache series, although the later wears a awful TVS Srichakra tyres.
    Well, I do understand that the suspension on 200 is stiffer, but at the same time it's also lighter, has a higher saddle height, better suspension and does not have the faring. That's why I was wondering given that the 200Ns with it's mono suspension is much better on track, should also be as good if not better than 220 in off roading!

    Leave a comment:


  • Akash.Yadav
    replied
    Originally posted by rahuldevnath View Post
    What's the reason behind 220 being a better off-roader? Is the chassis or suspension?
    @rahuldevnath : it can be because of its flexi chassis and softer suspension that P220 is found tobe better off roader than P200NS. P200NS' chassis is the renowned perimeter frame (please correct me if I am wrong) which is lighter in weight and very strong. This characteristic helps in retaining the cornering ability of the bike. Certainly enough, @MG sir would have told that P200NS is a better track tool than P220.

    Both chassis and suspension add to the character of the bike a lot. personal opinion, I find it a bit difficult to corner in my P150 but find it relatively easy on Apache series, although the later wears a awful TVS Srichakra tyres.

    Leave a comment:


  • J K
    replied
    Originally posted by nishant.sukharia View Post
    Maybe you are right..that could be true....
    by the way can you tell me what's the booking amount of the P200 NS and what is the waiting period ?
    Regards.
    My booking amount was 5K. Waiting period is still going on from February to me.

    August 7th is the date now told by showroom manager in Cochin.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X