Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Yamaha to invest Rs 800 cr on capacity expansion, new products
Collapse
X
-
i mentioned Fazer as a tourer. The FZ is more of a street bike.Originally posted by krishna View Postfz a tourer?!!!!.. that's new to me.. c`mon those fat tires were a gimmick for those who wanted huge rear tires on their bikes.
(This one's from the FZ6 page which holds good for the FZ range of motorcycles from yamaha)
The engine is tuned for more usable midrange power. As a multi-purpose motorcycle it can handle sport riding, touring, and commuting.
And Are you trying to say that fat tyres Do NOT provide more traction compared to thin tyres?
Last edited by Nithesh; 02-10-2012, 09:40 PM.Got a $5 head? Get a $5 helmet.
Comment
-
i was talking specifically about FZ16. like u said its definitely a street bike and for its power output those fat tires were really unnecessary.Originally posted by Nithesh View Posti mentioned Fazer as a tourer. The FZ is more of a street bike.
(This one's from the FZ6 page which holds good for the FZ range of motorcycles from yamaha)
The engine is tuned for more usable midrange power. As a multi-purpose motorcycle it can handle sport riding, touring, and commuting.
And Are you trying to say that fat tyres Do NOT provide more traction compared to thin tyres?
WITH GREAT POWER COMES GREAT RESPONSIBILITY
Comment
-
I second Nithesh here... Both the products deserve respect, ok? Why are people undermining Fazer/FZ like that?
FZ is one "unique" bike and its grip, torque and ride quality levels are good enough. Personally, I consider FZ a good bike to learn geared motorcycles riding and also, a "safer" bike for newbies compared to the other bikes.
About FZ's looks, everyone (including Bikers) wants good looking motorcycles, but that doesn't make those people posers. Their character and their rule breaking habits is what makes them posers.
What is Yamaha/ FZ's offence? Is being a good looking but slow bike a crime? Then, what about Stunner 125?---
Brotherhood, Rules, Freedom. Xbhp.
Indian riding = Alertness, Anticipation and Adjustment.
Comment
-
I could go on the tedious exercise of replying to each of your thoughts but before that, let's get back to the thread cause this is going no where. If you would have posted all this anywhere else in this forum, I too would have wondered. But in a thread where the manufacturer is committing to 800 cr in the market, does not go right.Originally posted by saurabh81 View PostIt depends on Manufacturer what it want to be a number muncher or pioneer. Ferrari is not know for the no. of cars produced nor does it want to be. In fact giving example of Yamaha itself is much better. What is Yamaha known for R1 or Crux. Comparing Yamaha with Hero itself proves which way Yamaha is going.
Imagine BMW enters India and launches a hatchback which gets successful and then BMW starts competing with Maruti for sake of No. Will that look good?
That's Y I have mentioned "Is Yamaha trying to be Hero Honda of 150cc"?? Even if it tries to do that, that segment is already over crowded. Y not create league of its own like it did with R15...
4 Yr in Indian (evolving) auto industry is long time to make changes. In past 4 yrs Bajaj improved many of its mistakes. Honda (even with limited capacity) became no 3., TVS with no new show went to no.4., Suzuki is rejected by ppl.
Even if we look at R15, from last 4 years it was leader as it was alone in its price range. Now it has many worthy competitor (CBR 150 and KTM Duke 200).
4Yrs back pulsar was no match to R15, now its comparable (if not better) at lower price (P200NS)
Yamaha got early mover advantage and gave a splendid show, but now the game is changed. Market is moved to 200 and 250cc. Does Yamaha has an answer to that??? Can it still pitch it 0-100 in 15 sec against <10sec of other bikes?? (losing 5 sec in every corner) Or it top wack of 132 against 165 (looking like a spec in rear view mirror). Considering over all performance R15 is no match now. In fact its no comparison at all.
Now it has to compete against its peer KTM 200, CBR150 and even P200NS...
By Euphoria I ment this fanboyism, that Yamaha is secrete desire of every one, even when it gave a no show ppl are still clapping
Indeed R15 was a revolution and path breaker in Indian bike world. Still its the finest 150cc available. But this is no more a India which use to shy away with good but new products (Dewoo Cielo etc.) Now it not only embraces new products but also shows its hunger towards more. 1800 CBR booking in one month of launch without even seeing the bike let alone test riding one is a testimony in it self about this fact. 250cc selling 1800 units a month, what else economy of scales Yamaha wants.??
Not only that Bajaj is always game to take the risk to do the new. It made lot of mistakes in past and got sufficient brickbats for it. But look at the guts a stand alone company with out any technical know how, did it all on its own by trial and error. Now that I call "Sportive"
And now it has every thing: R&D team, technical coloration, Efficient supply chain, dealer network, end to end every thing.
Who knows better than Yamaha how to make bikes and has very good fan following in India since long, the question why does it not make some???
Title of the thread : Yamaha to invest Rs 800 cr on capacity expansion, new products.
What they are going to invest on is still not out. Why such pessimism ? Is it not right to wait and watch before talking about being a spec in the rear view mirror ?
Saurabh81, you have been with Yamaha for a while. Still why such pessimism on such an optimistic thread and that's what I fail to understand that. Imagine the company one works for has been doing moderately good and to boost up the numbers company decides to invest a substantial amount. Now that someone could either say, "What the heck, 800 crores, so what" and continue cribbing on the company's moderate performance over the last few years or be happy that there could be a direction which he always wished for Or he could be pretty annoyed cause he just left the company and now the company decides a make over while he settled for the just any other option available.Last edited by abhisheksircar; 02-11-2012, 01:02 AM.
Comment
-
If Yamaha is active in India only from past 4 years, only Yamaha can be blamed for it.Originally posted by Nithesh View PostIt isnt easy to develop a bike for an Indian market every year, especially for an outsider like Yamaha who has only been active in the last 4 years now. Look at HMSI, as soon as they split up from Hero they are on a roll. 250R/150R/ New Dio/ New 110 commuter And there will be more to look forward to every year. But this was only possible because HMSI have been active for more than a decade now.
So give Yamaha some time and once they understand the market and its needs they too will start rolling out new models every year or two.
Yamaha is present in India since 1985 (Escorts Yamaha) it was the time when Yamaha established its legacy and built a cult status. It's working independently since 2001 (just 2 years after Honda)
While top manufactures in India know there core competency and are building upon that, Hero(with Honda): reliability. Honda Reliability + Technology. Bajaj: all in one VFM. Yamaha seems confused, it launched commuter(bad move), later a performance bike and a street bike (good move) and again a 150cc commuter (good move) but no performance bike(bad move). It has never been consistent.
Yamaha should understand its correct place and work accordingly.
Even suzuki is doing the same mistake. But not many blames suzuki as it does not have fan following in India.
Reason for this outlook is:Originally posted by abhisheksircar View PostI could go on the tedious exercise of replying to each of your thoughts but before that, let's get back to the thread cause this is going no where. If you would have posted all this anywhere else in this forum, I too would have wondered. But in a thread where the manufacturer is committing to 800 cr in the market, does not go right.
Title of the thread : Yamaha to invest Rs 800 cr on capacity expansion, new products.
What they are going to invest on is still not out. Why such pessimism ? Is it not right to wait and watch before talking about being a spec in the rear view mirror ?
Saurabh81, you have been with Yamaha for a while. Still why such pessimism on such an optimistic thread and that's what I fail to understand that. Imagine the company one works for has been doing moderately good and to boost up the numbers company decides to invest a substantial amount. Now that someone could either say, "What the heck, 800 crores, so what" and continue cribbing on the company's moderate performance over the last few years or be happy that there could be a direction which he always wished for Or he could be pretty annoyed cause he just left the company and now the company decides a make over while he settled for the just any other option available.
1. Apart from the scooter, it had a dull show in Auto expo
2. 800crs to be used for capacity expanssion, network expanssion and 150 cc. No talks about high performance bikes.
Companies look forward for such press releases to unveil the future plan and this plan don't have any mention of vertical growth. It's only related to Horizontal growth...
Anyways, It's Yamaha's money and it's upto them to decide what to do with it...let time decide who played well...
P.S. YAMAHA, Are you listening... we are talking about you...yes you Yamaha
Comment
-
Does Yamaha have a ready-to-launch 250 to take on the likes of Kawasaki or Honda globally? Nopes. That ancient Fazer 250 running in South America is a really old model and not upto the task!
I am sure, Yamaha is currently commited on new product development and India's growing 250cc market wouldnt be far from their attention. They are lagging behind in India no doubt and the quicker they bring on something, the better!!..tear the map and shoot the sign
Comment
-
800 crore investment, so what are we going to get Yamaha??
I don't think of Yamaha as a significant player in Indian market, inspite of huge fan following. They need to work hard and may be 3-5 years from now, they can gain on market share in India. Just hope half of that goes into opening all the dealerships that were closed prior to R15/FZ launch. That should prove to be a very good first step for them. Right now Yamaha, Suzuki are more or less in the same boat.
Of course, i'm mad on Yamaha for not getting R125 here
, i'll consider forgiving them if they get us R250.
Oh yeah, i'm also one of the guys that believe FZ is underpowered!! handling, ride is fine, but why do you need that kind of fat rear tyre on a 150cc bike, frankly that's overkill and it hits badly on mileage. why can't they release an FZ-E (executive), with relatively thinner rear tyre and possibly useable pillion seat, that should be good for their sales numbers. Also, FZ's top end performance is so-so when compared to competition.Last edited by vrugonnab; 02-11-2012, 04:09 AM.Let's bring down the monster of corruption to it's knees.. please visit http://ipaidabribe.com/
Comment
-
[QUOTE=Nithesh;770536]So according to you, if a bike isnt as Fast as its 150cc rivals and only has good design and a thick rear wheel at the back its a Poser bike eh?
Do you even know the purpose of the rear fat tyre on these bikes atleast? They are there to provide more traction. The Fatter/Wider the tyres the more contact they get with the road surface which equals high traction!
When you load up tourer bikes you should be looking at two things on ur bike. The amount of Torque available and then comes Traction(which most people have no clue about)!
The FZ/Fazer series do NOT fall under the R series which actually means They are not meant for Racing purpose.
The Fazer is more like a tourer and a very good/comfortable one at that.[/QUOTE]
i haven't complained about the rear fat tyre.and yes i am all ears for your FAT TYRE-TRACTION THEORY.so lets rewind back and see what fz offers with those INFLATED PRICE TAG that other 150 cc doesn't offer >>>>>>>>>>>>>NOTHING.ask me again.my answer will be NOTHING.
you say fazer is a tourer .BITE ME.well people do use even m-80 for their touring purposes that doesn't necesserily mean M-80 is a TOURER.
but yes fz's torquey 150 cc heart is enough for city roam about.onething other 150 cc's are doing well in terms of traction with their NOT- SO- WIDE TRACTIONLESS TYRE.and the question remains why do i race?
every finishing line is the begining of a new race.
#i have learnt to manipulate my own adrenaline and the perception of biking is different.
#overkill is underrated.
#how random roads may appear there is always a destination.sigpic
#i don't subscribe to co-incidence,either it is the rider or the other moron on the road
(:)people keeps on saying add spark to life, bajaj got hold of that idea and added an extra spark to bike.
Comment
-
the crime is they are charging premium over normal 150 cc's.Originally posted by Samarth 619 View PostI second Nithesh here... Both the products deserve respect, ok? Why are people undermining Fazer/FZ like that?
FZ is one "unique" bike and its grip, torque and ride quality levels are good enough. Personally, I consider FZ a good bike to learn geared motorcycles riding and also, a "safer" bike for newbies compared to the other bikes.
About FZ's looks, everyone (including Bikers) wants good looking motorcycles, but that doesn't make those people posers. Their character and their rule breaking habits is what makes them posers.
What is Yamaha/ FZ's offence? Is being a good looking but slow bike a crime? Then, what about Stunner 125?and the question remains why do i race?
every finishing line is the begining of a new race.
#i have learnt to manipulate my own adrenaline and the perception of biking is different.
#overkill is underrated.
#how random roads may appear there is always a destination.sigpic
#i don't subscribe to co-incidence,either it is the rider or the other moron on the road
(:)people keeps on saying add spark to life, bajaj got hold of that idea and added an extra spark to bike.
Comment
-
Oops I missed this point in earlier post (it was late at night)....Originally posted by abhisheksircar View PostSaurabh81, you have been with Yamaha for a while. Still why such pessimism on such an optimistic thread and that's what I fail to understand that. Imagine the company one works for has been doing moderately good and to boost up the numbers company decides to invest a substantial amount. Now that someone could either say, "What the heck, 800 crores, so what" and continue cribbing on the company's moderate performance over the last few years or be happy that there could be a direction which he always wished for Or he could be pretty annoyed cause he just left the company and now the company decides a make over while he settled for the just any other option available.
Anyways... As i mentioned earlier, I am among those of consumer who like to chose the best available in the market (as per requirement), and don't bother who produces it... And not like a fanboy who will wait long for any company to deliver...
And why I will be annoyed, Yamaha has not declared any bigger bike? (still they are content with 150, nice bike but I already tried it) and if it comes up with a bigger bike ill chose whats best available at that time...
I am not doing arrange marriage with bike that i have to search only in a particular cast (company) and chose what ever is available and later has to continue with same thru my life...
It's like a medium term relationships, chose the best available (as per your liking) and change to a better one when its is available. Yamaha, Bajaj or even Khaitan (if they ever do so) doesn't matter...
I wish Yamaha to bring better bikes so that I can have more choices next time (total selfish wish)...
Anyways, as I concluded earlier, it's Yamaha's money, its their decision where they want to put it...Last edited by saurabh81; 02-11-2012, 07:47 PM.
Comment
-
[QUOTE=sayank10;770830]Firstly it isnt MY theory.Originally posted by Nithesh View PostSo according to you, if a bike isnt as Fast as its 150cc rivals and only has good design and a thick rear wheel at the back its a Poser bike eh?
Do you even know the purpose of the rear fat tyre on these bikes atleast? They are there to provide more traction. The Fatter/Wider the tyres the more contact they get with the road surface which equals high traction!
When you load up tourer bikes you should be looking at two things on ur bike. The amount of Torque available and then comes Traction(which most people have no clue about)!
The FZ/Fazer series do NOT fall under the R series which actually means They are not meant for Racing purpose.
The Fazer is more like a tourer and a very good/comfortable one at that.[/QUOTE]
i haven't complained about the rear fat tyre.and yes i am all ears for your FAT TYRE-TRACTION THEORY.so lets rewind back and see what fz offers with those INFLATED PRICE TAG that other 150 cc doesn't offer >>>>>>>>>>>>>NOTHING.ask me again.my answer will be NOTHING.
you say fazer is a tourer .BITE ME.well people do use even m-80 for their touring purposes that doesn't necesserily mean M-80 is a TOURER.
but yes fz's torquey 150 cc heart is enough for city roam about.onething other 150 cc's are doing well in terms of traction with their NOT- SO- WIDE TRACTIONLESS TYRE.
Secondly You were the one who said The FZ/Fazer is a poser bike. Not ME!
Last but not the least please stick to Forum guidelines while posting at the forum.
Anyway,
Kindly explain "Traction" first. And also do point out its advantages without the help of google. Also let me know how does weight(or mass for that matter) affect traction. Maybe then i shall consider dissecting ur reply one by one.
Oh as for M80 touring, sure nobody will deny it. Heck one can even tour on foot or a bullock cart at such a pace. Why even bother buying a bike?
Again. Nobody is forcing you to buy a bike which "you" consider is overpriced. If u are happy with the other 150cc rivals why not just stick to them instead of complain about how this one's underpowered and overpriced?Originally posted by sayank10 View Postthe crime is they are charging premium over normal 150 cc's.
What is funny is, even though you claim it to be overpriced people still to this date buy R15's and FZ's because people know "quality" when they See ONE!
OFcourse a "Quality" product doesnt come cheap.
Again if you dont like it, just move on.
Cribbing about a 4 year old model will not change anything now, will it?Last edited by Nithesh; 02-11-2012, 08:13 PM.Got a $5 head? Get a $5 helmet.
Comment
-
How do you define normal 150cc's? Ok, answer my question: Which is the best looking, naked, 150cc streetbike in India?Originally posted by sayank10 View Postthe crime is they are charging premium over normal 150 cc's.
Will you say something like, CBZ Xtreme/ Hunk/ Pulsar? No. it is FZ.
FZ is around 75,000 something. Hunk is from 70-73, CBZX being around 72-75. Impulse is 76! R15 is 1.2L (yes, I know its tech...)!
And: GS150R, Pulsar, Unicorn and Dazzler are decently priced below the FZ.
So, that fits FZ somewhere on the higher side the 150cc crowd. If Hero can charge a premium for being reliable & a quality product, why can't Yamaha do the same thing? Are a few thousand rupees that big a matter?
By projecting to yourself that its underpowered (true though), you're failing to notice its other minor and major merits. Anyways, topic closed from my side...---
Brotherhood, Rules, Freedom. Xbhp.
Indian riding = Alertness, Anticipation and Adjustment.
Comment
-
well i never missed my physics class,so i don't need to google for such basic thing like traction,it's the tangential force that works across the interface of two bodies which results in either motion or stoppage.and traction =co-eeficient.weight.so more the weight more the traction considering the co-efficient will remain same. yes i did call them posers but not for the fat tyres.you got it wrong.even with the launch of p200 ns fz is still the best-looking naked on indian road.india is price-sensitive market so difference of even thousand rupees matter for non-enthusiast,otherwise fz would have sold like hot-cake.now as ktm has arrived tech-laden r15 sure looks over-priced.and the question remains why do i race?
every finishing line is the begining of a new race.
#i have learnt to manipulate my own adrenaline and the perception of biking is different.
#overkill is underrated.
#how random roads may appear there is always a destination.sigpic
#i don't subscribe to co-incidence,either it is the rider or the other moron on the road
(:)people keeps on saying add spark to life, bajaj got hold of that idea and added an extra spark to bike.
Comment
-
I am failing to understand a simple point here and failing to make you also understand a simple point. Let me give it one more try.Originally posted by saurabh81 View PostOops I missed this point in earlier post (it was late at night)....
Anyways... As i mentioned earlier, I am among those of consumer who like to chose the best available in the market (as per requirement), and don't bother who produces it... And not like a fanboy who will wait long for any company to deliver...
And why I will be annoyed, Yamaha has not declared any bigger bike? (still they are content with 150, nice bike but I already tried it) and if it comes up with a bigger bike ill chose whats best available at that time...
I am not doing arrange marriage with bike that i have to search only in a particular cast (company) and chose what ever is available and later has to continue with same thru my life...
It's like a medium term relationships, chose the best available (as per your liking) and change to a better one when its is available. Yamaha, Bajaj or even Khaitan (if they ever do so) doesn't matter...
I wish Yamaha to bring better bikes so that I can have more choices next time (total selfish wish)...
Anyways, as I concluded earlier, it's Yamaha's money, its their decision where they want to put it...
Back to the title of the thread. "Yamaha to invest Rs 800 cr on capacity expansion, new products". If they waste the whole money which does not help them in gaining market momentum, I am wasting my time here, else if they have a good product line in mind also while making this announcement, you are wasting your time. Things like "I moved on", "I am not a fan boy", "I go for the best in the market", "Yamaha is lagging behind", "Yamaha has not done much" etc. will not help this thread in anyway. You tell me, will it ? "Yamaha could get me back if they plan a R25 at a reasonable cost". "Yamaha should improve a lot on service". "Yamaha should come up with a reasonable 250 cc cruiser". These will definitely help this thread and probably Yamaha to take up some cues for their forthcoming road map. They did a brilliant job of listening to the customers and gave v2.0 which took care of everything that people complained in v1.0. A Bigger engine would make it a different bike altogether so as a upgrade they "listened". Now it's right to give it sometime and wait and watch.
That said, let's stick to your conclusion.
Originally posted by saurabh81 View PostAnyways, as I concluded earlier, it's Yamaha's money, its their decision where they want to put it
Comment



Comment