Since '02 xBhp is different things to different people. From a close knit national community of bikers to India's only motorcycling lifestyle magazine and a place to make like-minded biker friends. Join us

Castrol Power 1

Accelerate quick but brake easy.

Our Partner

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

TVS Motor Company unveils new 2012 TVS Apache Series

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • shahbaz63
    replied
    I Can Relate this to Nokia vs Sony Ericsson in late 10s & HTC vs Samsung in todays era



    There are nothing Like which Brand produces better quality its always about Customers.... & yes if there are more user for a "X" brand that doesnt make it better brand too [Ex:- Hayabusa, BMW & Ninja's (Very Less no. of User Own this)]

    From 2001 - 2012 Pulsar hasn't produced a Big Change in there Pulsar "Brand" (Except today's NS)... they are more or less just a few changover from 150 to 180, 180-200, so on.. But they were Cheap & completly towards General Indian Public where as Apache did lots of R&D & Personal Testings, they were focused towards Sporty, Modern Look with Latest different technologies...

    What I always felt was "Pulsar is majorly for General Public as but Apache is majorly for Bike Enthusiastic "

    Apache in hand of idiot is disguise

    Leave a comment:


  • Rahulbarik
    replied
    Originally posted by sambit View Post

    Seriously?? Dude,its clear that you are not a fan of Short Stroke motor.You are more fan of refined long stroke,cruiser type engines. But an honet request,please dont change the RTR characteristics(by replacing the A180 with P180 engine)... ..It was the only reason I bought my RTR.
    And about milage,yes,you are right,my friend's P180 shows more milage than mine.(mine is around 40-42 and his is 43-45)and we rip our bikes almost alike...
    And while talking about performance,you are forgetting the 0-60 and 0-100 timings...
    hehe man that engine swap part was for fun... dont mind... I do love short stroke...i am a huge fan of the duke...actually i was talking about the overall practicality of the two engines.... And man the rtr accelerates that fast because of that 46 rear sprocket and i think 13 front....coupled with light weight, thinner and hard compound tyres ever try fitting a 14/39 sprocket combination on an rtr180... See how it goes... just the fact man... If the rtr was 10 kgs heavier like the p180 and had the same tyres and sprockets as the pulsars then it would have been a completely different story(other than cornering)... one thing i have experience of is riding a p180 ug4 of my friend who runs a 14/47 spocket with extra chain linkage....and i wont say the accelaration part...guess it yourself... He is a very irresponsible rider though

    Leave a comment:


  • sambit
    replied
    Originally posted by Rahulbarik View Post
    Handling dont always means cornering...the cbr250 doesn't corner well so what it makes up in straight line stability... Pulsars always had an advantage over apache in highway cruising and high speed stability... ................................................
    ............ low rolling resistance... One more thing apaches have very short gearing which makes us feel that it is very powerful... People who say apaches ar fuel ...................................
    ........ bike 10 kilor heavier.... I simply wish if a pulsar 180 engine could be fitted on a rtr180 chasis...that thing could smoke a stock apache anyday... Put a 120/80...................................
    ............
    And tvs is trying to have just a tieup with bmw.... Hero made a tie-up with eric but what bajaj did is not a tieup... Bajaj OWNS ktm...
    And no offence to anyone but apache and pulsars both perform best what they are meant to be...

    Seriously?? Dude,its clear that you are not a fan of Short Stroke motor.You are more fan of refined long stroke,cruiser type engines. But an honet request,please dont change the RTR characteristics(by replacing the A180 with P180 engine)... ..It was the only reason I bought my RTR.
    And about milage,yes,you are right,my friend's P180 shows more milage than mine.(mine is around 40-42 and his is 43-45)and we rip our bikes almost alike...
    And while talking about performance,you are forgetting the 0-60 and 0-100 timings...
    Last edited by sambit; 07-11-2012, 01:29 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • amit_purohit20
    replied
    Code:
    Handling dont always means cornering...the cbr250 doesn't corner well so what it makes up in straight line stability... Pulsars always had an advantage over apache in highway cruising and high speed stability... Bajaj never made the pulsars for race track they perform best where they need to perform...ie city roads and cofortable cruising...pulsars are good
    I cannot agree more with you but I am not sure about what you said regarding fitting a Bajaj 180 engine to RTR chassis and it making wonders.
    Ones who are more concerned about the fun of riding go for RTR
    and the others who are highway tourers go for Pulsar's.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rahulbarik
    replied
    Handling dont always means cornering...the cbr250 doesn't corner well so what it makes up in straight line stability... Pulsars always had an advantage over apache in highway cruising and high speed stability... Bajaj never made the pulsars for race track they perform best where they need to perform...ie city roads and cofortable cruising...pulsars are good offroaders too... Take a rtr over 110-120 and it tends to fly...horribly unstable.... Pulsars are cheap, very reliable, anywhere service and extreamely fuel efficient... A rtr160 gives same mileage that of a pulsar 180 and a rtr180 gives same mileage that of a 220... Yes rtr have a very good chasis..they are meant to be ridden at a track and they do it better than pulsars... Rtr perform better than pulsars of the same cc just because lighter weight and hard compound tires which doesn't grip and therefore very low rolling resistance... One more thing apaches have very short gearing which makes us feel that it is very powerful... People who say apaches ar fuel efficient are just hardcore apache fans... Even with 10 kilos lighter and gripless tires return poor fuel efficiency majority around 38...very rarely people get above 40...there are a lot of apaches returning 30kmpl... The pulsar 180 returns average of 42 and lowest of 39-40..riding sanely it goes upto 45 that too with very gud tires, which is soft compound, fatter and the bike 10 kilor heavier.... I simply wish if a pulsar 180 engine could be fitted on a rtr180 chasis...that thing could smoke a stock apache anyday... Put a 120/80 zapper c at the rear of a rtr and the bike simply becomes slow... So what i wanted to say is both bikes are different and should be treated the way they are meant to be... Recent pulsars have a robust engine...is very reliable and is an all rounder...pulsars itself are made to be allrounders unlike rtr, r15, duke which are purposebuilt...
    The sale figure says it all man...
    And tvs is trying to have just a tieup with bmw.... Hero made a tie-up with eric but what bajaj did is not a tieup... Bajaj OWNS ktm...
    And no offence to anyone but apache and pulsars both perform best what they are meant to be...

    Leave a comment:


  • vrugonnab
    replied
    Originally posted by payeng View Post
    This is where Husqvarna comes in


    Cool, so the tie-up would be with Husqvarna brand rather than BMW.

    @Sai, may be you can ride one to convince yourself, it's a sharp handling bike (atleast for the city traffic).
    Last edited by vrugonnab; 07-10-2012, 09:02 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • sai_ace
    replied
    Originally posted by payeng View Post
    Its an accpted fact that the 1st Gen Pulsars did not love cornering. But in 2012 the Pulsar 200NS with its Perimeter frame changes everything.. its an awesome handler. Even the Pulsar 135LS is a sweet handler.
    I take my words back on the handling wrt to the 200 NS, I meant all pulsars produced till date (1st gen, dtsi, fear the black, 220fi, 220 carb) except the new NS. Also, I personally am not convinced about the 135LS.

    cheers!
    sai

    Leave a comment:


  • payeng
    replied
    Originally posted by vrugonnab View Post
    That's the only puzzling part of this deal, coz BMW doesn't have any experience with small engines unlike KTM. So, it's really interesting to see what TVS gets & what BMW is looking for out of this deal.

    As for Pulsar's handling, P135LS was the first product that changed it all. P200NS takes it to next level. I won't be surprised if P200NS comes out on top in a race with R15. Excellent handling coupled with extra power will certainly help P200NS exit each corner a lot faster than R15.

    This is where Husqvarna comes in



    Leave a comment:


  • vrugonnab
    replied
    Originally posted by sai_ace View Post
    I would love to see 200 -300 cc tvs bikes with some fantastic tech inputs from bmw/husqvarna. But the exhaust should be handled only by the TVS boffins who simply create the best sounding 4 stroke exhausts (victor, centra, fiero, rtr fi)

    cheers!
    sai
    That's the only puzzling part of this deal, coz BMW doesn't have any experience with small engines unlike KTM. So, it's really interesting to see what TVS gets & what BMW is looking for out of this deal.

    As for Pulsar's handling, P135LS was the first product that changed it all. P200NS takes it to next level. I won't be surprised if P200NS comes out on top in a race with R15. Excellent handling coupled with extra power will certainly help P200NS exit each corner a lot faster than R15.

    Leave a comment:


  • payeng
    replied
    Originally posted by sai_ace View Post
    I was with you till the bold part. TVS rtr chassis was good, not as great as r15 but the best after that. But no pulsar chassis till date comes close to the way an rtr corners inspite of its achilles heel (literally) - the tvs tyres.
    Its an accpted fact that the 1st Gen Pulsars did not love cornering. But in 2012 the Pulsar 200NS with its Perimeter frame changes everything.. its an awesome handler. Even the Pulsar 135LS is a sweet handler.


    Originally posted by sai_ace View Post
    I would love to see 200 -300 cc tvs bikes with some fantastic tech inputs from bmw/husqvarna.
    Same here




    Leave a comment:


  • sai_ace
    replied
    Originally posted by Enthusiastic View Post
    Bajaj had always been better on the technology front event their earlier gen-bikes like P220i, P220DTSFi, P135LS were much better on the tech front. Powerful 220cc bikes as early as early 2007, 4 valve tech, smoother engine etc, DTSi engine as early as 2003. Even the chasis of these bikes though not very good but were better than Apache.

    I was with you till the bold part. TVS rtr chassis was good, not as great as r15 but the best after that. But no pulsar chassis till date comes close to the way an rtr corners inspite of its achilles heel (literally) - the tvs tyres.

    if you want proof go to kari motorway or mmsc track, check out when the local race boys/mechs go out for their racing - you would hardly find a pulsar in a field dominated by apaches, fieros, unicorns and CBZs. I would be laughed out of the district if i told them to race a pulsar.

    I am a TVS fan boy, but have always appreciated bajaj for being the leader when it came to providing the junta with the stuff. Alloy wheels, disc brakes as stadard, digital meters, backlit switches, nitrox suspension, oil cooler, led lights, projector lamps - its a terrific list!

    That said, TVS has a lot to learn from BMW - LC engines, fi engines, new frames, monoshocks, USD forks etc and BMW can leverage on TVS' tight manufacturing processes, their minimal production losses and their experience on the indian track. Heck they also can make use of the Indonesian factory of TVS. Also a pretty strong dealership network.

    For us all we think of is how fast a bike goes, how it corners, does it have an lcd tacho whatever. But only when we understand a bike development cycle - from the business need, to R&D, to testing, to personnel training, to production and continuous improvement to both machine and process can we fathom how incredible the machine we ride is. And this entire process is what is appreciated by another company - competitor or possible partner.

    I would love to see 200 -300 cc tvs bikes with some fantastic tech inputs from bmw/husqvarna. But the exhaust should be handled only by the TVS boffins who simply create the best sounding 4 stroke exhausts (victor, centra, fiero, rtr fi)

    cheers!
    sai

    Leave a comment:


  • kantu
    replied
    Originally posted by kantu View Post
    Great !!! Hope it comes true and TVS shares go sky high as well
    Originally posted by anilupadhya View Post
    Some more news
    Shares of TVS rose on the news and at 0647 GMT they were up 6.4% at 38.95
    Source : TVS, BMW in Talks for Technical Pact - WSJ.com
    As predicted

    As I see chances of this deal becoming a reality is more as the top players right now(in no order)
    Hero, Bajaj, Honda, TVS have a tech partner or are in process of getting one. Only TVS is without one ergo BMW has to enter on its own or strike a deal with TVS.

    Leave a comment:


  • anilupadhya
    replied
    Some more news
    Originally posted by http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303567704577515864259949698.html

    NEW DELHI -- TVS Motor Co. is in talks with BMW AG's motorcycle division for a possible technological alliance, a move that may help the Indian company in developing higher powered two-wheelers to compete with local rivals Hero MotoCorp Ltd. and Bajaj Auto Ltd. as well as Japan's Yamaha Motor Co. and Honda Motor Co.

    "We will share more details on the nature of the talks in due course," Venu Srinivasan, chairman of Chennai, south India-based TVS, said by phone on Monday.

    A technological alliance is key for TVS to expand its product portfolio and arrest dwindling market share. TVS lost its position as the third-biggest scooter and motorcycle maker by sales in the last financial year ended March to Honda's two-wheeler unit in India.

    A collaboration will help TVS develop bigger motorcycles and be better equipped for the fast-changing Indian two-wheeler market. Even though two-thirds of motorcycle sales in India are in the entry-level segment -- with engines in the 100-125 cubic centimeter range --the market for bigger motorcycles is expanding rapidly.

    Local sales of motorcycles with engines above 125cc rose 17% in the past financial year to 2.99 million units. The growth outpaced a 12% rise in total local sales to 10.1 million motorcycles.

    "A pact with BMW will change the fortunes of TVS," said Deepak Jain, an auto analyst at Sharekhan Ltd. "TVS has been stuck with its products, and technology from BMW will help it become a major player in the bigger-motorcycle segment."

    Mr. Jain said a possible pact will also help BMW as the German auto maker can utilize TVS's sales network to sell its products in India.

    A BMW India spokesman didn't respond to calls.

    Shares of TVS rose on the news and at 0647 GMT they were up 6.4% at 38.95 rupees on the Bombay Stock Exchange, where the benchmark index was down 0.8%.

    Earlier Monday, the Mint newspaper, citing Mr. Srinivasan, said TVS isn't considering selling any stake to BMW.

    If talks with BMW conclude favorably, TVS will join Hero MotoCorp and Bajaj Auto in tying up with global two-wheeler makers to source technology for making larger motorcycles.

    Hero MotoCorp had recently signed an agreement with U.S.-based Erik Buell Racing LLC for sourcing engines, while Bajaj Auto uses the technology and sells some products of Austrian bike maker KTM Power Sports AG, in which the Indian company has a 47% stake.

    BMW's motorcycle division, BMW Motorrad, sells models under its R and K series and the S 1000 RR superbike in India.

    BMW Motorrad's chief, Hendrik von Kuenheim, said in February the company was seeking partnerships with two-wheeler manufacturers in emerging markets, including in India, to locally build its motorcycles or some parts.
    .
    Source : TVS, BMW in Talks for Technical Pact - WSJ.com

    Leave a comment:


  • Enthusiastic
    replied
    Originally posted by saipranav View Post
    Bajaj and Hero both went to their respective partners because both of them needed some new pathbraking technology and i'am glad bajaj found it. But both hthese guys had LOADS of money.
    TVS does not exactly require new tech. they have it, they can make more of it. TVS doesn't have the kind of money Bajaj and Hero have(just a rough calculation). TVS' one year profits are less than bajaj 1/2 month profits...
    Sorry but that too much exhagerration and I can't take that with a pinch of salt. I am not anti-TVS by any manner but to quote the truth its TVS which needs more tech than Bajaj. Bajaj had always been better on the technology front event their earlier gen-bikes like P220i, P220DTSFi, P135LS were much better on the tech front. Powerful 220cc bikes as early as early 2007, 4 valve tech, smoother engine etc, DTSi engine as early as 2003. Even the chasis of these bikes though not very good but were better than Apache. Where Apache was better was the thrilling power in 150 and 180cc segments with a slighly sportier sitting position and a lighter body with more grunty engine. But with P200NS Bajaj has broken all grounds!! With a company as credible as BMW its TVS who would benefit the most. BMW by no way are going to make cheaper and sub 600cc bikes under their Brand names. Having said that would love to see TVS 200-250cc bikes with 20HP+ engines.
    Last edited by Enthusiastic; 07-09-2012, 10:55 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • shelton_jh
    replied
    I got this information from a reliable source that TVS would launch it's much awaited 220cc next month. Not sure though, lets wait and see

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X