So I am planning to buy my new bike, and am facing the dilemma faced by everyone.Which bike to buy.I have narrowed it down to 3.Apache 160RTR,
pulsar 135ls, and the Yamaha FZ.
I am a 19 year old student, and i wont be needing the bike for more than 5km-6 per day.
The problem is I am fairly lean and short 5'6.
My budget is below 80k.
So here are the pros and cons for these 3 in my humble opinion.Kindly weigh in and correct me if i am wrong.
Apache 160
pros-power, performance, speed
cons-Oh my god, the looks.Why did the have to spoil a perfectly good looking model.Is there any place I can get a old Apache model?
Pulsar 135LS
pros- performance, mileage, looks and the Pulsar name tag.
Cons- Ive heard that Pulsars start to trouble the user after a year or so and are high maintenance bikes??True??Please help.
Yamaha FZ
There's one big doubt I have.The difference between FZ-S and FZ 16
pros- handling power speed performance looks
cons-weight, perhaps will look a bit too bulky on me, cost
So these were my opinions.Kindly weigh in guys.Also please suggest any other bike if you can think of any.
Thanks.




. . . I too had this kinda bad opinion but after my cousin gave me his 180 to ride for a day, now whenever I feel like riding it, I get his
. . . The bike is cool, best handling of the three, superb brakes than the three and a bit on the powerful side too, also not to forget good for college use and will suit your height. . . Just go with it, you'll be fine. . .

Comment