I bought a used ns200 , it is having front wheel heaviness problem
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Sold Pulsar 220 , now which next ?
Collapse
X
-
Re: Sold Pulsar 220 , now which next ?
Somehow I managed to damage the getting disc. It was slightly bent cuz of which my front tyre was not moving freely. Got it replaced... Problem solved.Originally posted by vvk1999 View PostWhat was the front disc break problem u facing?
I bought a used ns200 , it is having front wheel heaviness problem
Still don't know how it got bent
Comment
-
Re: Sold Pulsar 220 , now which next ?
Sadly, The answer is no. P220 cant be replaced. Karizma R comes close to it but its discontinued. Due to lack of dual shockabsorber , modern day bikes lack the comfort p220 offers. Forget about handling but we need comfort. Thats it .Originally posted by jammbuster View PostSorry to bump in between discussion... Cbr250/mojo is vise decision after p220...... But these bikes are above 1.5rs..
Below this...consider rs200... Is there any bike near to p220?.. Which having great suspensions like p220 ?
Comment
-
Re: Sold Pulsar 220 , now which next ?
Which bike do you have right now?Originally posted by jammbuster View PostSorry to bump in between discussion... Cbr250/mojo is vise decision after p220...... But these bikes are above 1.5rs..
Below this...consider rs200... Is there any bike near to p220?.. Which having great suspensions like p220 ?
Comment
-
Re: Sold Pulsar 220 , now which next ?
Agree. The comfort in Pulsar 220 is unmatchable with the current Pulsars + 220 has very good low end torque.Originally posted by vvk1999 View PostSadly, The answer is no. P220 cant be replaced. Karizma R comes close to it but its discontinued. Due to lack of dual shockabsorber , modern day bikes lack the comfort p220 offers. Forget about handling but we need comfort. Thats it .
I used to own a 220, but if anyone suggests me to buy another 220, i would never do that.
Handling is a very important factor in a bike which includes braking as well and this should never be discarded. I met with some accidents in the 220, which might not have happened if 220 was a better handler. Maybe if the 220 was a lil more flickable, maybe if the 220 had breaks that work for the rear tyre the accidents might not have happened.
Pulsar 220 lacks these characteristics:
Good brakes + the bike should be able to make sudden turns and hold its ground if a dog or an insane human jumps in the middle of the road..It's a lot like nuts and bolts - if the rider's nuts, the ride - bolts!
Comment
-
Re: Sold Pulsar 220 , now which next ?
Same feelings here from a person who had pulsar 220 before (2015 model sold it ), people saying newer generation 220 is better than before is saying nonsense. I think they made it better before than now. Couldn't tolerate the roughness and vibration, wobbling, fish tailing, skidding etc etc, but seems like people who are using it can tolerate these issues, just to say it has 220cc. Handling is worst and it never flicks or turns. Some people even think that 220 is superior than 200NS or AS200(or duke 200) . AS200 has pathetic quality. Although none of these are good. People should check out the refinement of any Japanese bikes and then think about buying 220 and not just for the sake of having 220cc.Originally posted by Sal View PostAgree. The comfort in Pulsar 220 is unmatchable with the current Pulsars + 220 has very good low end torque.
I used to own a 220, but if anyone suggests me to buy another 220, i would never do that.
Handling is a very important factor in a bike which includes braking as well and this should never be discarded. I met with some accidents in the 220, which might not have happened if 220 was a better handler. Maybe if the 220 was a lil more flickable, maybe if the 220 had breaks that work for the rear tyre the accidents might not have happened.
Pulsar 220 lacks these characteristics:
Good brakes + the bike should be able to make sudden turns and hold its ground if a dog or an insane human jumps in the middle of the road..
Comment



Comment