![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|||||||
What Bike?
|
Register Now for FREE!
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#131 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 711
|
hmm... i'm 176 cms and nver faced any prob... but its again a subjective matter... my body can adjust at almost any position easily without much prob... you can tell those things by doing a test drive only
__________________
Apache 180
|
|
|
|
|
|
#132 (permalink) |
|
Professional Whistler
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Chennai
Posts: 371
|
We have come across many technical terms and abbreviations like
TPFC (2004 CBZ) DTSI (Pulsar) PGMFI (GlamourFI and ZMR) ATFT (New CBZ) CVT-II (Flame) and many many more. But the only bike which stands out is the RTR (Racing Throttle Response) Yes, the Racing Throttle Response could be felt real time unlike the above, which merely reflects only in stickers and no difference felt practically. But thats the only thing good about the RTR, the dark side - Horrible handling and poor suspension, which will not even be submissive while applying brakes. I would suggest the FZ anytime over the RTR, With regular service intervals on both bikes the FZ remains stock healthy even after 2 yrs unlike the RTR. Regarding performance still FZ has an edge over. Though it makes only 14PS compared to the 15+ in Apache, FZ revs smooth and silent to the redline than the RTR and Handling, braking is nothing you can compare, FZ is miles ahead. |
|
|
|
|
|
#133 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#134 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Himachal
Posts: 55
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#135 (permalink) |
|
Professional Whistler
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Chennai
Posts: 371
|
@ kantu and bindyesh
I have mentioned horrible handling, because I got spoiled with Yamaha's handling for the past 2 yrs. ![]() Even yesterday I had to swap my bike for an RTR 180, I felt like committing suicide at 120Kays (On an access controlled expressway). Road grip is pathetic, Too much of Wind disturbance may be its not well aero dymanic, high speed conering is out of question, unless you change to MRF soft rubber. Vibes, leave them apart. Over 100Kph on an empty stretch I never enjoyed anything rather being too much conscious on road stability. I do admit its nimble within city limits less then 60kays. But I am 100% HONEST IN SAYING FZ HANDLES FAR BETTER THAN APACHE IN EVERY ASPECT and thats what the topic is all about and am not comparing Apache with other bikes. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
| Tags |
| apache rtr 160, yamaha fz |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [What Bike]: Honda CB Twister 110, Yamaha Gladiator 125 or Yamaha SZ.. | tann | What Bike? | 46 | 02-16-2012 08:47 PM |
| Yamaha Technology Docs available on Yamaha Website. | JitenMistry | Pit Stop:General Biking Discussion | 12 | 03-25-2010 05:39 PM |
| [What Bike]: Upgrading from Apache RTR160 to Yamaha R15 | Wheel_Spin | What Bike? | 27 | 12-09-2009 05:55 PM |
| [What Bike]: Wait for Apache RTR 180 or Get the Apache RTR 160? | haxor | What Bike? | 17 | 10-28-2009 04:51 PM |
| [What Bike]: APACHE RTR 160 FI vs YAMAHA FZ 16 | harismahesh | What Bike? | 43 | 11-29-2008 08:47 PM |