Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Must know information about TVS Apache RTR 180 MENACE
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
...which would mean a completely different bike which is in this case is not going to happen.Or may be i am wrong!!Originally posted by Hyperion View PostWill 17.5-18 Bhp be "menacing" enough? Hard to believe.The bike will have to have a very good power-to-weight ratio
Comment
-
I don't get it. Why, the carbed version when FI can be launched straightaway? The 180FI can be positioned to take on the R15/P220 with a clear demarcation between the 160FI as the FI will be higher priced. This is what I hate about the manufacturers: milking the market.Originally posted by ACE_HUNTER View PostName:Apache RTR 180cc
Company:TVS
Power:17.5-18 Bhp
Colour: One Colour Said-White & Blue TVS Racing Colour
Launch Day/Month-Expected Before Apr 14
Engine: First Carb After 4-5 Months FI Comes
Price-Btw 80k-82k
Source:Call From TVS Office Chennai
PPl Cross Your Fingers
Comment
-
Originally posted by ACE_HUNTER View PostName:Apache RTR 180cc
Company:TVS
Power:17.5-18 Bhp
Colour: One Colour Said-White & Blue TVS Racing Colour
Launch Day/Month-Expected Before Apr 14
Engine: First Carb After 4-5 Months FI Comes
Price-Btw 80k-82k
Source:Call From TVS Office Chennai
PPl Cross Your Fingers
carbed............?????????????????
i doubt it.......The Magician"
Comment
-
This thread has gone so boring.... all BaSeless assumption and speculations...Super CommuTOURer� - Talk less, Ride more
.: FB :.|.: TW :.|*IG*| Ex PowerDrift:.
#Give thy opinion, write em, dont throw em
#Everyone errs, accept it, defending/cribbing about it only makes it worse
#Dont defend a manufacturer as if you work for them
#Write. Think. If relevant hit submit. If not hit yourself
#Be kind in your choice of words, you never know who would make you gulp em
� Satyen Poojary
Comment
-
It is well expected that the 3rd RTR installation is gonna be launched within a couple of months as this is the time of the year when RTRs are launched specifically.Carb version and FI difference I cannot say anything.But the FI version should be made standard.We dont need a carb on a High performance bike.This can also be the classic case of performance carb being tested for road bikes on first few bikes.
I think keeping our fingers crossed and gettin a scoop picture should be our only motive here,we can speculate elsewhere.Hell's Angel
sigpic
Comment
-
Me Too But the guy said like thatOriginally posted by rennycornelius View Postcarbed............?????????????????
i doubt it.......
The TVS Don't Want To Drop The Sales Of RTR 160 FI When The RTR 180 FI Also Launched So That They Are Launching The Carb First(Jus My GuessOriginally posted by jayprashanth View PostI don't get it. Why, the carbed version when FI can be launched straightaway? The 180FI can be positioned to take on the R15/P220 with a clear demarcation between the 160FI as the FI will be higher priced. This is what I hate about the manufacturers: milking the market.
)
Failure should never go to heart & success should never go to head,both makes a person to fall in life-Winston Churchill
Yesterday is history.
Tomorrow is a mystery.
Today is a gift, That is why it is called \"Present\".
Enjoy every moment.
Comment
-
It could be the carb'ed version because TVS might wanna use them in this year's RRC. To be able to do that they need to get it homologated and for homologation they need to manufacture & sell a number of 'em. I recall TVS team trying the rtr 160 fi on track but felt carb'ed rtr's were better suited for RRC. So this could be a reason for the launching the carb 180 first.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ACE_HUNTER View PostThe TVS Don't Want To Drop The Sales Of RTR 160 FI When The RTR 180 FI Also Launched So That They Are Launching The Carb First(Jus My Guess
)
I feel the other way round. say the RTR 180 FI is placed around 88K and then place the carb at 82K then the carb will eat up the 180 FI's sales. So I its right to place the carb at 82 first, see the demand/defects/improvements needed and then place the Fi at 88+K
well Y the carb version at all? so that we can tweak it easily..
Comment
-
I have another question..
Why would anyone buy the RTR 160 Fi, when he can get a much powerful flagship carb RTR 180..??
The RTR 160 Fi is almost priced almost on the same level as the FZ16 and still I have definitely seen more FZ16's on the road compared to the 160 Fi (which by the way surprises me
)..
and considering by what that has been posted so far, the RTR 180 won't be too costly than the FZ16.. in that case I can't see the RTR 180 not eating into RTR 160 Fi's sales.
Last edited by payeng; 04-04-2009, 12:08 AM.
Comment
-
point hai.Originally posted by payeng View PostI have another question..
Why would anyone buy the RTR 160 Fi, when he can get a much powerful flagship carb RTR 180..??
The RTR 160 Fi is almost priced almost on the same level as the FZ16 and still I have definitely seen more FZ16's on the road compared to the 160 Fi (which by the way surprises me
)..
and considering by what that has been posted so far, the RTR 180 won't be too costly than the FZ16.. in that case I can't see the RTR 180 not eating into RTR 160 Fi's sales.
other people are just goin for fz is cause of its company.
actually they dont know what rtr is capable of.m i rite?
Comment
-
Its not got to do with the sales etc. In fact its far from it. From the people I spoke to, TVS wants to steady itself in the Fi-market and iron out niggles and make sure dealers are better equipped. The 160 Fi will do it for them. The 180 Fi will only be launched later(in fact MUCH later). Till then its the 180 carb.Originally posted by ACE_HUNTER View PostThe TVS Don't Want To Drop The Sales Of RTR 160 FI When The RTR 180 FI Also Launched So That They Are Launching The Carb First(Jus My Guess
)
@Payeng: Many reasons man. First its Yamaha brand name. Added to that, the FZ is a lot more appealing and its much smoother too.Democracy is when 2 wolves and a sheep meet to decide who is for dinner. Liberty is when the sheep has a gun.
Comment
-
Smoother than the RTR the FZ definitely is.. but then so is the latest 150 cc in the market, the Suzuki GS150R.. isn't it?Originally posted by Aparajith View Post@Payeng: Many reasons man. First its Yamaha brand name. Added to that, the FZ is a lot more appealing and its much smoother too.
Also it isn't the Yamaha Brand alone which sells.. had that been the reason, the market would have at least been flodded with Gladiators (if not the Alba's and Crux's)..
this is what one would typically see of the FZ on road.
>> the FAT Rear Tyres from the rear,
>> Unique Headlamp and FAT Front Forks from the front and
>> PUFFED up Tank from the side
I have ridden the FZ16.. the engine's smooth and the handling is definitely good, but even then I would say that it is the "Bike on Steroids Looks" which is the prime selling point of the FZ.
Can anyone answer this: How different the GS150R technically (in terms of the technology gone into the bikes) from the FZ16..??
Lesson for TVS to learn from the FZ16: If it just resorts to the Bajaj Pulsar way (of 20 cc and a few bhp upgrades) for its RTR 180... but with Minimal Changes in LOOKS.. the FZ16 might still continue to outsell it.
The RTR 180 better be Special LOOKING.
Comment



Comment