Since '02 xBhp is different things to different people. From a close knit national community of bikers to India's only motorcycling lifestyle magazine and a place to make like-minded biker friends. Join us

Castrol Power 1

Tubeless tyres are better than tubed ones.

Our Partner

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bending and LeaningThread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Killer
    replied
    Yes which is why in my above post i've said "indian bikes apart from the R15". The R15 runs a very aggressive V profile tire which actually gives it more contact patch while leaning than while travelling in a straight line. All other indian bike tires work the other way round with more contact patch avaiable for straighline riding and less as the bike leans. If you remove the R15 tire from the wheel you would be hard pressed to find the difference between the R15 tire and a FZ16 tire, the R15 tire will look as wide as a 140 section tire. Once on the rim it looks thin simply because that width is then used to form a pretty agressive profile.

    Leave a comment:


  • pranay
    replied
    Originally posted by Killer View Post
    I'd like to add something here. While what old fox said is true, at the limits of lean you are always going to run out of tire contact patch and that WILL become an issue. So you have to take both the forces acting on the bike / tire as well as the contact patch into consideration. For example even on the superbikes with race profile tires, we are running past the shoulder of the tire and basically rounding it off. Thats how far we carry the lean and at that angle you're riding on VERY little tire. Ofcourse none of this is one the road. On an indian bike (apart from the R15) tire profiles are designed to provide the most contact patch while riding in a straight line and as you lean the bike you will run out of contact patch much sooner.
    If I may ask you, Killer, coming just to contact patch, even though the 220 and 200 has a wider tire, while leaning the R15 tire would have a greater contact patch than the tires on the these two. Of course, there is no doubt that the chassis geometry, weight, stickier tire compound, revvier engine are major factors that contributes to the R15 being much faster on the track, but just the isolating the contact patch between these two while leaning, would you think the patch on the R15 tires is equal to if not more on the pulsars' tires?

    I say this because I actually feel that the R15 tire actually has a greater contact patch than these two at a certain angle, which helps it corner alot faster than the pulsars, besides the factors above.

    Leave a comment:


  • Killer
    replied
    I'd like to add something here. While what old fox said is true, at the limits of lean you are always going to run out of tire contact patch and that WILL become an issue. So you have to take both the forces acting on the bike / tire as well as the contact patch into consideration. For example even on the superbikes with race profile tires, we are running past the shoulder of the tire and basically rounding it off. Thats how far we carry the lean and at that angle you're riding on VERY little tire. Ofcourse none of this is one the road. On an indian bike (apart from the R15) tire profiles are designed to provide the most contact patch while riding in a straight line and as you lean the bike you will run out of contact patch much sooner.
    Last edited by Killer; 01-07-2009, 11:25 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • pranay
    replied
    Originally posted by niks_devil666 View Post
    ....Maybe its because they want the rider/driver to do most of the work and not the banking angle to help you out.....
    AFAIK, thats exactly why they don't have it in race tracks.

    Originally posted by MavericK46 View Post
    @ Pranay : I think the banking of roads is referred to as cambering

    I quote from : Camber - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    "In road construction, the convex curvature of a road surface, see cant (road/rail)"
    Hmm...had that somewhere in mind...but just didn't click...thanx anyways dude!
    Last edited by pranay; 01-06-2009, 06:12 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • niks_devil666
    replied
    Originally posted by Joel View Post
    The race track at Chennai does not have banking angles. Its pure flat surface. Banking is on public roads normally. Unless its a NASCAR or Indycar race track.
    If you look at most of the race tracks only the "high" speed corners have a banking (or cambering).Maybe its because they want the rider/driver to do most of the work and not the banking angle to help you out.

    Leave a comment:


  • Joel
    replied
    The race track at Chennai does not have banking angles. Its pure flat surface. Banking is on public roads normally. Unless its a NASCAR or Indycar race track.

    Leave a comment:


  • MavericK46
    replied
    @ Pranay : I think the banking of roads is referred to as cambering

    I quote from : Camber - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    "In road construction, the convex curvature of a road surface, see cant (road/rail)"

    Leave a comment:


  • HydBiker
    replied
    @OldFox
    Sir, thanks for the explanation there. This thread is helping me point by point in improving my cornering abilities but I am shit scared when I see sand even in middle of a corner.... expecting the roads to throw a surprise any where!

    Well, I have one thing to ask you -

    Originally posted by Old Fox View Post
    But the reason is not a larger contact patch. Modern symmetrical design tyres give you an alomst similar contact patch over the useable lean angle range.
    What are these modern tyres??? I know that the tires on R15 are sure the type you are speaking of... (tyre + the way it is mounted on a smaller rim to give contact patch when leaning). But, how far are the tyres used in other bikes we have here (that most of us ride) come under this category?

    Is it enough that a tyre has the same pattern on both the sides from the center to be called a symmetrical design?

    To me, most (not sure of all) of the MRF Zapper series tyres seem to be of symmetrical design. Am I right?
    Last edited by HydBiker; 01-06-2009, 04:59 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • pranay
    replied
    Originally posted by niks_devil666 View Post
    Pranay : I believe most of us have solved various physics numericals on leaning and road banking in 9th class
    ...And what we studied in 9th class still applies now. And thats what we are basically discussing.



    Originally posted by niks_devil666 View Post
    And by the way "banking" of roads exists in India too.
    Yes, but not in most places they should be. Its getting better though.

    Leave a comment:


  • niks_devil666
    replied
    Pranay : I believe most of us have solved various physics numericals on leaning and road banking in 9th class

    And by the way "banking" of roads exists in India too.

    Leave a comment:


  • Technocrat
    replied
    Sagar, What I would recommend is that you start noticing your speed at a particular corner(ask your friend for reference) with various techniques that we have discussed, with each experience you will get faster

    Leave a comment:


  • pranay
    replied
    Originally posted by SAGARR_46 View Post
    Hi Oldfox,
    Okay now even I am a little bit confused So if I understand you correctly, it is the tangential forces rather than the reducing contact patch of the tire of your leaning bike that reduce traction at a given corner and hanging off the bike in turn helps you counter these forces. Please correct me if I am wrong and help me get this right.

    Leave a comment:


  • SAGARR_46
    replied
    Originally posted by Technocrat View Post
    Woh Joke tha bhai
    Dude I need to thank you anyway because your joke indirectly prompted a reply from Old Fox which in turn is helping me better understand the true purpose behind leaning a bike with the right technique

    Leave a comment:


  • Aryan
    replied
    Originally posted by Technocrat View Post
    Woh Joke tha bhai
    Bloody hell!

    Leave a comment:


  • Technocrat
    replied
    Originally posted by Sagar
    Originally posted by Techno
    Btw more contact also means more friction & hence less speed
    Also in my opinion more contact does not reduce speed when you are leaning a fair bit.
    Woh Joke tha bhai

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X