Since '02 xBhp is different things to different people. From a close knit national community of bikers to India's only motorcycling lifestyle magazine and a place to make like-minded biker friends. Join us

Axor
Magazine
Castrol Power 1

All the gear all the time (ATGATT).

Our Partner

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Apache RTR/FI

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 647
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 286 336 376 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 396 436 486 647 template Next
  • #5776
    Rear fender eliminator

    will attach the pulsar 135 ka rear fender into the bike....but lets see.
    what is the cost of the rear frnder of pulsar 135?
    @renny can you please post the pic of your bike with \A180's rear fender

    how does it look?

    Speak Less,Speak Wise!

    Sarcasm is my automatic response to stupidity.

    Comment

    • #5777
      Welcome Back, Julianpaul!!

      @indianz_alive
      You have got a point but at the end practically even a minuscule difference could affect the handling. I say if one is thinking of switching to a 17 incher then fitting the rear shock absorbers of the 180 should also be taken into consideration.

      sigpic

      Comment

      • #5778
        Originally posted by haxor View Post
        @renny can you please post the pic of your bike with \A180's rear fender

        how does it look?
        Go back few pages, i've already posted the pics.
        The Magician"

        Comment

        • #5779
          Originally posted by julianpaul View Post
          Because the switch from 18" to 17" rear wheel would lower the rear of the bike by 1" ? Otherwise the saddle height would be 1" or 25mm lower than the 160s
          Oops, sorry I ignored that part. I just measured the length of the shocks on my 180 with the bike on centre stand and rear wheel in the air. The length from nut to nut is ~36cm and the length of the spring is ~21cm. How does it compare to that on the 160?

          Originally posted by rennycornelius View Post
          And i thought they just painted them golden, that's it.
          Intertchanging them with 160 will improve the cornering dianamics for sure i believe.

          And if someone swaps the swingarm of 160 with 180 then i think the bike will be lowered from rear making the front light, as the position of the rear shocks mounting may be different too.
          The swingarms won't be a direct swap. The shock absorber mounting points is modified and you may have to change the chain cover because "the relief cut is modified to suit modified wheel assembly" and probably the silencer too because the depression on the silencer near the axle may not match with the new swingarm.

          Other than the trail angle (dunno if you can adjust it), swingarm and tyre size the geometry of the RTR 160 and 180 seem to be the same, atleast according to the service manual for 180.
          Most motorcycle problems are caused by the nut that connects the handlebars to the saddle.

          -Unknown

          Comment

          • #5780
            Originally posted by indianz_alive View Post
            Changing rear alloy 18" to 17" will result a 12.7mm decrease in height of axle of rear alloy.
            (12.7+12.7=25.4mm = 1 inch)
            Furthermore, using 110/80 profile tire would mean 88mm tire wall height.

            Now by switching from 100/80-18 to 110/80-17, the tire wall height will increase by 8.0mm. So, the net decrease in rear axle height will be (12.7-8.0) 4.7mm.
            I knew i was miscalculating something. I was considering dia as rad. So the diff is 12.7mm. But one major idea behind switching to 17" for me atleast was to use the r15 rear which is still a 100/80. I don't believe in unnecessarily upsizing unless grip demands it. It's a waste of power.

            Originally posted by SARAB_FI View Post
            uptill now 17' with IRC is performing upto the mark, but yes after a thorough i can say something. for tht this saturday m heading towards himachal pradesh it will b of 1000kms ride to n fro with xbhp delhi memebers(http://www.xbhp.com/talkies/xbhp-off...il-2010-a.html) . there i can check its stability and grip while leaning n bending.
            This should be a good test man. And post pics too!

            Originally posted by haxor View Post
            Rear fender eliminator

            will attach the pulsar 135 ka rear fender into the bike....but lets see.
            what is the cost of the rear frnder of pulsar 135?
            @renny can you please post the pic of your bike with \A180's rear fender

            how does it look?
            Looks cool man! very cool.

            Originally posted by chicane1879 View Post
            Welcome Back, Julianpaul!!

            @indianz_alive
            You have got a point but at the end practically even a minuscule difference could affect the handling. I say if one is thinking of switching to a 17 incher then fitting the rear shock absorbers of the 180 should also be taken into consideration.
            Cheers mate and +1. That's what i'm thinking too.

            Originally posted by rags View Post
            Oops, sorry I ignored that part. I just measured the length of the shocks on my 180 with the bike on centre stand and rear wheel in the air. The length from nut to nut is ~36cm and the length of the spring is ~21cm. How does it compare to that on the 160?

            The swingarms won't be a direct swap. The shock absorber mounting points is modified and you may have to change the chain cover because "the relief cut is modified to suit modified wheel assembly" and probably the silencer too because the depression on the silencer near the axle may not match with the new swingarm.

            Other than the trail angle (dunno if you can adjust it), swingarm and tyre size the geometry of the RTR 160 and 180 seem to be the same, atleast according to the service manual for 180.
            Cheers for the measurements. Now if i can only get my damn bike back from my bro to measure my shocks!

            I've already considered the swingarm to be pretty hard to graft on to the 160. and even the shocks would be an unnecessary expense. as it is the wheel is nearly 3k. yeah i know, i'm a cheapskate.

            Comment

            • #5781
              I still say, is all this hassle worth for the sake of changing to a tire? Get yourself the Ceat Secura Sport 100/90-18 tubeless.
              Democracy is when 2 wolves and a sheep meet to decide who is for dinner. Liberty is when the sheep has a gun.

              Comment

              • #5782
                Originally posted by Aparajith View Post
                I still say, is all this hassle worth for the sake of changing to a tire? Get yourself the Ceat Secura Sport 100/90-18 tubeless.
                So, you found something. Their website doesn't mention a tubeless though.

                Comment

                • #5783
                  Originally posted by HydBiker View Post
                  So, you found something. Their website doesn't mention a tubeless though.
                  It does not mention it, but the Ceat tire ur planning for the R15 is also available in the 18-inch format. Its a bit rare (atleast I did not find it here and had to settle for the ZMR rear)
                  Democracy is when 2 wolves and a sheep meet to decide who is for dinner. Liberty is when the sheep has a gun.

                  Comment

                  • #5784
                    Originally posted by Aparajith View Post
                    It does not mention it, but the Ceat tire ur planning for the R15 is also available in the 18-inch format. Its a bit rare (atleast I did not find it here and had to settle for the ZMR rear)
                    Sir, whats the model num of ZMR's rear?(ZAPPER Y or Q or FS?)
                    The Magician"

                    Comment

                    • #5785
                      Originally posted by Aparajith View Post
                      It does not mention it, but the Ceat tire ur planning for the R15 is also available in the 18-inch format. Its a bit rare (atleast I did not find it here and had to settle for the ZMR rear)

                      oh! you've got the Zapper Y then. Good. How's the grip level? it is supposed to be a little soft compound. BTW, how much did it cost?

                      The Vertigo Sport doesn't have a tubeless in 18". Sure of that. But I think at least the Secura Sport has tubeless in 18".

                      Comment

                      • #5786
                        I have a rtr refresh rd model.
                        guys why is that when the engine is cold there is a big thud when the first gear is engaged?
                        It does not happen when the engine has run a bit..

                        Comment

                        • #5787
                          Originally posted by jigsaw91 View Post
                          I have a rtr refresh rd model.
                          guys why is that when the engine is cold there is a big thud when the first gear is engaged?
                          It does not happen when the engine has run a bit..
                          Clutch play more than required.
                          Adjust it.
                          The Magician"

                          Comment

                          • #5788
                            Originally posted by julianpaul View Post
                            Cheers for the measurements. Now if i can only get my damn bike back from my bro to measure my shocks!

                            I've already considered the swingarm to be pretty hard to graft on to the 160. and even the shocks would be an unnecessary expense. as it is the wheel is nearly 3k. yeah i know, i'm a cheapskate.
                            You probably know this already but I'll just reiterate it, to compare the two shocks you also need to put the bike on centre stand and have the rear wheel in the rear so that its loaded similar to mine when I took the measurements. The service manual just mentions a different spring rating and there is no mention of difference in lengths, so the may not be different. You may just have to change the setting on the shocks.

                            It makes sense to first try with just the wheel, if you try to change everything at the same time then there are too many variables you will have to adjust. It would certainly be more quick steering than it is now and should be fun. Do let us know how it feels whenever you get it done.
                            Most motorcycle problems are caused by the nut that connects the handlebars to the saddle.

                            -Unknown

                            Comment

                            • #5789
                              Noob question,Why is it necessary to use mineral oil initially for the first 5k kms and not synthetic.?
                              what positive effct does it have on the engine?eventhough synth has its own advantage

                              Comment

                              • #5790
                                Originally posted by jigsaw91 View Post
                                Noob question,Why is it necessary to use mineral oil initially for the first 5k kms and not synthetic.?
                                what positive effct does it have on the engine?eventhough synth has its own advantage
                                the synthetic oil with its superior lubricating properties hinders the running-in process and does not let the piston rings get the right clearances .

                                Comment

                                Previous 1 286 336 376 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 396 436 486 647 template Next
                                Working...
                                X
                                © xBhp.com 2026. All rights reserved.
                                Designed by xBhp