Alan mentions that he is waiting to test the 200. So may be he has tested it now?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
KTM Duke 200: Review out on xBhp very soon!!!!
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
but you can notice lot of resemblance between the two.even the words are same.chances are there that somebody has edited it.Originally posted by MeTaL_MaNiaC View PostIsnt this article dated 12/01/2010. (almost two years old) or is it that only i see the date??
Alan mentions that he is waiting to test the 200. So may be he has tested it now?
Comment
-
Both have almost the same cycle parts, hence the resemblance.Originally posted by mid View Postbut you can notice lot of resemblance between the two.even the words are same.chances are there that somebody has edited it.
The top speed mentioned is indeed hard to believe as 127 on speedo would mean at least 125 in real. But then it being on BSM and Alan riding it can't be false.
EDIT: This appears like a copy-paste. Thanks for bringing it up Payeng
Last edited by sheelpriye; 12-04-2011, 12:43 AM.
Comment
-
^may be you are right and it also- it can be that - to gain an amazing pick-up, top end is sacrificed.Originally posted by MeTaL_MaNiaC View PostHeart and logic believes that 127 is too less for such a machine. But maybe they want to restrict it at the top speed as it has no fairing to protect from wind blast and may have a more upright position. Plus lesser weight may not aid stabilty at top speed.. Does this make any sense? Just my imagination to believe the above article.
I too hope that this is not true.
and the articles we are discussing are actually two different articles but parts of the articles are same, like entire sentences are same, when i was reading them i was wondering whether it is actually the same article edited by someone else.
Comment
-
Are you guys talking about this too,Originally posted by princesirohi View Postand the articles we are discussing are actually two different articles but parts of the articles are same, like entire sentences are same, when i was reading them i was wondering whether it is actually the same article edited by someone else.
World Exclusive! KTM Duke 200 review!
?
I didnt feel its fake. Why will BSM publish fake ride report? (with pics) (i know why they may do), but if so, nothing can be trusted. Anyways, i am not breaking my head after this. Ifs and buts would keep coming till the final launch. We can be happy speculating till then.
You gotta risk it.. to get da biscuit !!!
Comment
-
This was exactly what i was thinking if at all the Top speed claimed is to be true.Originally posted by MeTaL_MaNiaC View PostHeart and logic believes that 127 is too less for such a machine. But maybe they want to restrict it at the top speed as it has no fairing to protect from wind blast and may have a more upright position. Plus lesser weight may not aid stabilty at top speed.. Does this make any sense? Just my imagination to believe the above article.
I too hope that this is not true.
And by this i was actually going to answer Payeng's reply to my post on the P200 thread
Now imagine the same R15 with 200cc engine 25bhp and no fairing. Do you think she will handle the same way at top speeds?Originally posted by payeng View Post
Just imagine the R15 with a 200 cc, 25 bhp engine..!!
Obviously not. Aerodynamics kick in and alters the behaviour of bike at high speeds.
And as metalmaniac has wondered(so have i) maybe the KTM has been setup for acceleration over topspeed?
Keep in Mind KTM's were mostly popular with the stunters across the globe. You dont have to hit topspeed to pull out ur moves. Enough bottom end power will do justice. So im thinking on KTM being the quickest of the lot. but maybe not "fastest" of the lot
Either way only time will tell. So when are they releasing her?Last edited by Nithesh; 12-04-2011, 02:26 AM.Got a $5 head? Get a $5 helmet.
Comment
-
The top speed mentioned for the 125 is 77 MPH, which works out to 123 kmph, the 200 doing just 4 kmph more is hard to digest, I guess he did that speed in 5th gearOriginally posted by sheelpriye View PostBoth have almost the same cycle parts, hence the resemblance.
The top speed mentioned is indeed hard to believe as 127 on speedo would mean at least 125 in real. But then it being on BSM and Alan riding it can't be false.
EDIT: This appears like a copy-paste. Thanks for bringing it up Payeng
.
Comment
-
can u believe peak power & rev limiter kicking in at the same 10000rpm? 125km/h is the derestricted duke 125's topspeed! (even a pushed hard unicorn can do close to speedo indicated 120 kms at favored conditions!)
and if u know that article was fake then why the heck u believe whats being said there!
yes topend'll be less but 127kms is kinda unacceptableLast edited by mid; 12-04-2011, 08:55 AM.
Comment
-
AerodynamicsOriginally posted by Nithesh View PostNow imagine the same R15 with 200cc engine 25bhp and no fairing. Do you think she will handle the same way at top speeds?
Obviously not. Aerodynamics kick in and alters the behaviour of bike at high speeds.
come on.. is there any difference of top end between P220F & P220 S?? IMO, if anything, the so-called aerodynamics should work against full faired bikes as they have more contact surface area, they work only to reduce wind blast.
Let's bring down the monster of corruption to it's knees.. please visit http://ipaidabribe.com/
Comment
-
Aerodynamics definitely works buddy. The top speed of P220F is greater than P220S.Originally posted by vrugonnab View PostAerodynamics
come on.. is there any difference of top end between P220F & P220 S?? IMO, if anything, the so-called aerodynamics should work against full faired bikes as they have more contact surface area, they work only to reduce wind blast.Ride, ride and ride.. But always do it responsibly..
Comment
-
so you say wind tunnel testings are joke?Originally posted by vrugonnab View PostAerodynamics
come on.. is there any difference of top end between P220F & P220 S?? IMO, if anything, the so-called aerodynamics should work against full faired bikes as they have more contact surface area, they work only to reduce wind blast.
anyway ktm dirtbikes with flyweight have better topend than the so claimed 127
Comment
-
by how much?? 10%.. 20% can you put a number on that?Originally posted by Ivin View PostAerodynamics definitely works buddy. The top speed of P220F is greater than P220S.
Wind tunnel testing is certainly not a joke, I know why it is done. But that doesn't mean naked bikes can't do same speeds.. remember we do have some exotic naked bikes from Ducati.Originally posted by mid View Postso you say wind tunnel testings are joke?
anyway ktm dirtbikes with flyweight have better topend than the so claimed 127
Anyways, if we can get out of this naked vs fully faired topic.. I do believe from whichever angle you think 127kmph top speed is simply not acceptable for a machine that's producing 25bhp and weighing just about 135kgs.Let's bring down the monster of corruption to it's knees.. please visit http://ipaidabribe.com/
Comment
-

are they testing KTM engines on Pulsars or is this the KTM 125......?
what u guys think.?
Comment
-
Or a pulsar 125/135/150/200??Originally posted by vishnus View Postare they testing KTM engines on Pulsars or is this the KTM 125......?
Whatever it is, its better in the pulsar thread only. Dont want to see a duke turned like this
and on the top speed disscussion, some people like "how much it does", some like "how it does"(whatever it does) and some like "how much it returns". Cant a product be designed for a specific class? If i buy it as a streetbike, i think 127 is enough for me. For touring, definately not enough.
OT:Btw, i dont believe a unicorn can do 120
how muchever pushed, except for falling down a mountain
(favourable condition?)
please excuse me for saying this.Last edited by MeTaL_MaNiaC; 12-04-2011, 10:54 AM.You gotta risk it.. to get da biscuit !!!
Comment



Comment