Since '02 xBhp is different things to different people. From a close knit national community of bikers to India's only motorcycling lifestyle magazine and a place to make like-minded biker friends. Join us

Castrol Power 1

Always keep the chain well lubricated.

Our Partner

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New Pulsar 220 to launch on June. 23: Details out on Post No. 521 & 524

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • pavanchirmade
    replied
    Originally posted by moeed View Post
    Having so many features over the zma, but still I fail to understand "why do people opt for zma"?
    People opt for ZMA because of the "Honda Engines are reliable engines, HH bikes need very less maintenance....etc."
    So people just blindly opt for a HH or a Honda.
    NO OFFENCE MEANT TO ANYONE


    But ZMA has time and again proved to be a good bike. It may not be torquey, it may not be a crotch rocket, but it definitely is very smooth in cruising at high speeds. Its the taller gearing that keeps the engine stress free at higher speeds.

    Leave a comment:


  • moeed
    replied
    Phew... It took almost an hour for me to read all the posts. Here's my take on this.


    Originally posted by prafultripathy View Post
    Fastest bike to be made ever... - Yea Right! I guess they din't hear of the Yammy RD 350 ever being made here....
    I guess they meant, "Fastest bike to be made ever by an Indian company".


    Originally posted by payeng View Post
    (Bajaj doesn't resort to sticker/paint jobs, but improve its bikes with every iterations).

    Not unless somebody is hell bent for a "full fairing" or is blind like Pankaj Kapur (as in the blind man TV ad who would only go for the Splendor) not to see anything else.
    I liked these lines!


    Originally posted by pads View Post
    all criticism for Bajaj only...... what other cos. provide...... Bajaj always try to do things differently...... its not like TVS(Apache 160 n then after few years 180) or Hero Honda(sticker jobs) or Honda(Unicorn is here for so many years and then ....... oh Stunner ) or Yamaha(they did good..... but again FZ-16, FZ-S and maybe half-faired FZ)....... did I miss something.......
    guys there's no comment from Bajaj side regarding the launch or the specs......
    I totally agree with your point.


    Originally posted by pavanchirmade View Post
    Oh just stop crying for exclusivity. And please do NOT compare bajaj's bike to any other bikes, especially HONDA and HH. If I buy a bajaj bike now and if i sell this one and buy the next edition of the same variant, there are a lot of changes seen in the bike.

    Same is not the case with other manufacturers. Especially HH and HONDA
    If you buy a next edition of a HH or Honda bike, you will definitely see a change in the bike.......Stickers and red alloys are amazing changes. Ain't they?

    Also i don't understand why people here are crying about p220 not being a track tool.
    Have they written a R anywhere on the bike? Is it Bajaj Pulsar 220R DTS-FI[old one]??
    They themselves say their bikes are city bikes or street bikes. No one from their side ever claimed any bike from their stable to be a track bike.

    Please don't talk about innovation and improvement on bajaj bikes by comparing them with HONDA and HH. Honda has way too much money which they put in R&D.They sell bikes in several countries.They are BIG.Bajaj is relatively small but doing damn good.

    Pulsar range has evolved superb!compare the classic 180 to the 180UG4.There's so much improvement.
    That's absolutely right!


    Originally posted by Obsessed View Post
    Whoever takes the competition one step ahead is good for us. I don't care if it's Bajaj, Yamaha or TVS.
    But, I would definitely be pleased if it's Bajaj or TVS, coz they are OUR (Indian) companies. I hope the new P220 takes the competition one step further!
    Even I would be pleased to see Indian manufacturers to be on par with the foreign ones.


    Originally posted by Devilpulsarian View Post
    if we look closely in our market. Who is the leader in terms of volumes- Honda...!
    They are the largest sellers and by far with a 97cc engine which has not been upgraded (rebored/retuned) since 1980s
    Unicorns,karizma etc all of them are way too old...but people buy those bikes....
    So, you cant expect one (or two) companies to keep investing in R & Ds and the others taking the major pie of the market....!
    Bajaj is moving on its own pace and I am proud to say that TVS and Bajaj (along with Yamaha) have taken our Indian biking scene to new horizons otherwise our children would have also ridden those 97cc horizontally mounted 7 bhp hondas....!

    and quite ironically....THOSE are the very people, (most of whom) have never owned a BAJAJ.......
    Thanks to all these manufacturers, who have bought about a revolution in the Indian biking scene.


    Originally posted by vipin_s View Post
    Speed and mileage are lapped up by customers very easily, I hope 140+ kmph is true speed and not a marketing gimmick like 109kmpl (which failed badly) and now no one believes Bajaj's mileage claims.
    Bro, 109kmpl is "under standard testing conditions". My platina returns between 89-91 kmpl in proper city riding(tested it many times). It might return more on the highway. What more mileage do you expect from a bike?


    Originally posted by inflammable View Post
    Tell me HONDA & YAMAHA have been making bikes for decades now... And Bajaj is company who have done loads of things on their own in pst 10 years... When Honda or Yamaha makes small capacity bikes... they can take loads of help from old expert Honda (Yamaha) people who work on litre bikes... cruisers... moto sports... Moto GP... etc etc... So for Honda & Yamaha everything is at their disposal.. And honestly NO R&D is being done over here in India... its being done in Japan.. in the most sophisticated laboratories of Honda & yamaha... which has taken years for them to build.

    for Bajaj its not... they tear apart the engines... study the designs.. do loads of R&D and then come up with their product... which in my view is much more comendable in comparision to Honda's effort.

    P.s - Bajaj is not having the most sophisticated labs... On top of that... Bajaj is doing loads inhouse... not like other indian manufacturer... TVS taking help from AVL.. to design their engines...

    So when you compare Bajaj with Honda.. its comparision of 5-6 decades of experience.. to 1 decade of experience. (Yamaha's launched their first bike in 1958.. And Honda made their first bike in 1950s again). Is it really logical.

    Man HOnda & Yamaha have been participating in Le mans race.. Moto Gp... and what not... Honda has been making cars too... so the kind of expertise they have inhouse.. its out of the world... I have personally spent a good time in Honda.. witnessing how good they are at making engines... (Honda Cars - greater Noida)..

    Race - where you develop engines which have to run at their peak loads... continuously... There are tremendous amout of stresses on engine at high rpms... and yet deliver the best performance... where a micro second delay can be a reason for you loosing the title. When you develop Racing engines... you use the best technology to develop them and take your R&D to next levels... And R&D budgets for racing bikes is much more huge than budget for street bikes. More budget means.. you have the freedom to experiment and test more... there is liberty to creativity... when you experiment more... you learn more... You use best manufacturing processes and commit mistakes.. and then learn from them... and deliver the best next time. You use manufaturing processes whihc you cant think of using in mass production. You need accuracies where difference of a micron can lead to drop in pressure from Combustion chamber... etc etc... and when you get expert in making the race engines... making street bikes are a game for you. Look at it this way... When any new class litre bikes are launched it always said - This bikes takes its character from Moto Gp version. That means.. guys from racing team worked with team working on street version... slipper clutch... forged pistons... ceramic brake pads... etc.. etc..

    Bajaj is not developing racing engines... cars or bikes.. whatever... so they dont have the capability what Yamaha & Honda has.... they make autorickshas...
    And despite that.. they have managed to give an awesome competition to both Honda & Yamaha... And thats why I respect...

    To tell you guys... Yamaha was actually scared to show FZ16 in Auto expo.. Yamaha was cared of Bajaj.. coz somewhwre they thought that... Bajaj is the only company... which can spoil the game.. what if.. bajaj comes out wiht a bike better looking than FZ16.. They know.. bajaj is aggressive. And this real incident came from my source who was actively involved in Launching of FZ16.

    When you compare Bajaj with Yamaha & honda.. its like comparing a man with his grand father... And I bet... as a Man.. Bajaj is going good. We will see 10 years down the line...

    When Yamaha or Honda product fails in India.. they have the backing from HONDA or YAMAHA Japan.. their parent company... I remember when i was in yamaha.. doing my training (2004)... they recieved 200 Crores.. from Yamaha Japan.. coz Yamaha was not doing good... And loads of their bikes were returned from showrooms.. coz the showrooms shut down.. or showrooms were not able to sell Yamaha bikes for months. A lot of 400 bikes was recieved by Yamaha from some state.. including Enticer... Crux. Even now when yamaha launched R15.. they had been granted fund mounting to 800 crores (if I recall it correctly)... So Yamaha japan has its hands over Yamaha India. Similarly Honda Japan.

    BUT WHEN BAJAJ FAILS... they have to pay their own bills. There is no parent company to support bajaj with crores and crores.. So fear of failure for bajaj is more than Honda india or yamaha india.
    Hats off to Bajaj!


    Originally posted by Joel View Post
    The test was done by a magazine reporter only but incidently he is a racer too. Hence better figures.
    Now, would you wanna read an article about say a Nissan GTR doing Q'tr mile in 15 secs coz the test reporter could not push its baalls out...when the same thing in the hands of the right driver can do a 12 secs flat. Which is the right verdict?
    The reporters incapability to test should not reflect on the product.
    3 yrs ago, Autocar did a speedtest feature of TVS factory drag bikes. The TVS Drag shaolin in the hands of M.S.Ravindra will do 14secs or lesser (depending on conditions), a bike which pumps 30bhp and mind you its a God damn peaky 2-stroke. One of the Autocar reporters rode the same bike and clocked 17.5secs in Qtr mile. The same reporter did 17 secs on the Drag Shogun which is approx 26bhp(coz it was less peaky). So was the underpowered bike faster or the rider incapable?
    Its the same case with the R15 and p220. Peaky bikes have a way in which it has to be dealt. Any monkey can sit on a torque monster and the avg speeds will the same even if Rossi rode down a straight.
    I totally agree with your point. A lot depends on the rider as well.


    Originally posted by Devilpulsarian View Post
    We don't believe magzines....

    we dont believe magzine riders...(without knowing them)

    we dont believe videos on the net

    we dont believe........................................... ...........

    So what we do is "Believe ourselves"....

    and as far as I can say about both of these bikes....

    Without getting into figures and stuff...
    P220 is a blaster in terms of a straight-line drag...
    It beats an R15 quite convincingly...

    R15 is way too nimble for a p220 in corners and tracks...
    and it beats a p220 even more convincingly ...!

    Moreover there is a lot in both of these two bikes to look and admire rather than outright race/drag results....
    Well said buddy!


    Originally posted by payeng View Post
    The other side of the story is that compared to the P220, the handling on the R15 is so forgiving that it makes any monkey sitting on it feel as if he is a 'desi' Rossi.
    Agreed. R15 handles really well!


    Originally posted by road_ripper View Post
    Oh come on dude, I know I can expect that much from Bajaj, After all its not a stickering company .
    When the P220 fi was showcased in auto expo, many were skeptical about it to making it to showrooms as Led tails, oil cooler, FI, digi speedo were as good as james bond car's features in indian market. Now you know these features are passe.
    Bajaj dares to play the radical game and when it comes to changing the rules of indian automotive industry, nobody does it better than Bajaj. I woudnt be surprised at all if Bajaj comes out with the specs i mentioned.
    I like the spirit of Bajaj to experiment new things.


    Originally posted by payeng View Post
    You are right the Pulsar engine has been tuned for Low-Mid Power.. for the sake of Fuel efficiency and better city driveability.
    But with the fastest bike claim, maybe the state of engine tune has been altered as well.. its not too difficult (especially with carbs).


    By the way, talking of Dud engines, the R15 has as Dud an Engine at Low Revs as the Pulsar engine at high revs.
    Peace?

    I felt the same thing while riding them.


    Originally posted by Lost Soul View Post
    Think before speaking , the 220 has tubeless tires that wont leave you stranded on the middle of the highway pushing your bike ,it has projector so the cows and buffalos on road are better illuminated , it does not suffer from severe power loss that Zma gets at high altitute , more stable on highway with crosswinds , is more fuel efficient and so has a better range .
    So its obvious who is the better touring machine .
    Having so many features over the zma, but still I fail to understand "why do people opt for zma"?


    Originally posted by santoosh View Post
    I appreciate bajaj for whatever they have done till now , be it good or bad,

    Thing with us also is that, we want everything for less.
    r15 ppl say is overpriced , but it gives something which is class apart.
    If bajaj gives something for lesser , we complain quality is not good.
    For once we need to atleast appreciate what they are doing , they arent doing a cut copy paste job like HH does(agree that the product is good).
    Few more days, wait n watch.

    Santa
    I agree with this!


    Originally posted by santoosh View Post
    A good product sells , whether it has the gadget or not.

    Santa
    Lovely quote..

    Leave a comment:


  • hell_glider
    replied
    I think FI is the unavoidable future. good or bad is of course up for debate.

    1. no mainstream car in the country is sold today with a carburettor. its FI all the way. Reliability is pretty much sorted out and we hardly have any niggles. in the same way, these niggles will be sorted out on bikes too. plus the learning curve will presumably not be as steep.
    2. on the plus side, no more carburettor adjustments, cleaning, or running improper mixtures.
    3. Fuel is only going to get more and more expensive, so yes, fuel economy will matter eventually and to a large section of the market. also, this will become even more important as bigger cc engines become common place in the indian biking scene. the difference in FE at that point, between an FI vis-a-vis a carburetted system will become too much to ignore.
    4. Emission laws and restrictions are only going to get more and more tougher, and in the not too distant future, carburettors will not be able to cut it anymore. this may be sooner than we all assume.
    5. On the manufacturing point of view, FI is expensive now, also in part, due to lack of volumes, in addition to premium charged for "cutting edge" technology. but given the volumes, in terms of materials used, eventually the components required to put together an FI system, will be as cheap as carburettors today, or in fact, it may be so that, it costs more in terms of material and process costs to actually manufacture a carburettor.
    6. from a tuning point of view, given that the tuner has the understanding of the engine to begin with and the required tools at hand, it should be easier to tune the engine for a specific performance level, whether sedate riding or the tracks, as compared to multiple trials and errors required for a carburettor based system.

    There is one huge drawback though. FI means our trusted friendly neighbourhood mechanics will not be able to do serious work on the engine, and the manufacturers are never going to provide them the diagnostic hardware or software. third party tools may be a long time coming and expensive for the friendly neighbourhood mechanic. So we will be forced to go the the ASCs for engine specific work, which is great for the manufacturers and the dealers. Maintenance is huge revenue and they are going to work towards getting bike maintenance to generate revenues like car manufacturers.

    So long term, FI will be the standard for bikes as well. no way in hell will TVS or bajaj stop further development on FI.
    Last edited by hell_glider; 06-18-2009, 03:04 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • outworldly maniac
    replied
    Originally posted by Devilpulsarian View Post
    In India a flagship model can not be carb....hence Ninja would be FI....
    and whats the logic behind this ?

    Leave a comment:


  • santoosh
    replied
    ^
    rtr 180 is tvs flagship ,
    zma is hh flagship
    unicorn is honda's flag..

    i dont see no fi on those.

    I see fi on 160 and glamour and stunner.

    A good product sells , whether it has the gadget or not.

    A simple example,GSX1300R,better known as "busa" still sells with an analogue speedo, and its suzuki's flagship model in india too, where as the gsr150 gets a digi console.

    Santa
    Last edited by santoosh; 06-18-2009, 02:30 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Devilpulsarian
    replied
    Originally posted by outworldly maniac View Post
    bhai ninja has a carb as far as i know



    In India a flagship model can not be carb....hence Ninja would be FI....

    Leave a comment:


  • Devilpulsarian
    replied
    Originally posted by vipin_s View Post
    @devilpulsarian : 'Pulsar' is already 8 year old..right (4 models and several upgrades)...When will they 'break-even' with the competition, any idea ?


    Believe me...............NO.....

    Leave a comment:


  • outworldly maniac
    replied
    Originally posted by Devilpulsarian View Post
    Ok......here goes another story........

    This is done to accomodate Ninja which is coming with an FI and at 1.50 lakh......
    bhai ninja has a carb as far as i know

    Leave a comment:


  • vipin_s
    replied
    Originally posted by Devilpulsarian View Post
    +1.....
    Very well said...

    And after owning/having close affinity with all the generation of pulsars I can safely say/feel/know how much bajaj has improved on the handling of its bikes.....with each new iteration....!

    But, among all the other manufacturers in the country, it still remains a fact that 'others' make better handling bikes than Bajaj....!
    @devilpulsarian : 'Pulsar' is already 8 year old..right ? (4 models and several upgrades)...When will they 'break-even' with the competition w.r.t 'handling', any idea ?
    Last edited by vipin_s; 06-18-2009, 02:09 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • inflammable
    replied
    Originally posted by nitrosatya View Post
    My Fi Pulsar 220 will give me more average!

    Anyways i am not regretting anything about my choice.My bike gives me the rush whenever i request! That's it!
    It can be other way round also... No further comments...

    Well some real good stuff being discussed over here.. when I left at 8.30 pm.. it was at page 18...andnow its page 23... great. Some real good stuff from hell rider... kwokfist... maniac... satyen... and joel... the modification expert... Loved reading the stuff... Thanks...

    Leave a comment:


  • Devilpulsarian
    replied
    Ok......here goes another story........



    This is done to accomodate Ninja which is coming with an FI and at 1.50 lakh......

    Leave a comment:


  • KwokFist
    replied
    ^+1 Santa

    Originally posted by insanebiker View Post
    U got anything to support that claim? We would prefer few dyno charts rather than mere comments.
    Refer HERE. If that does not satisfy you at all. You are free to dyno-test a P220 and find out for yourself.

    ~peace

    Leave a comment:


  • santoosh
    replied
    Few things bajaj needs to sort out what i feel from my end.

    Oil drinking issues that have been common on all gen pulsars.
    Pls rectify it.

    On R15-Last week i rode to hyd did 572 kms non stop in 6 hrs 48 mins at 8500rpm all through.
    oil had run 2230kms totally. Not even 50 ml loss in oil.
    I couldn do this without tension/fear/surprise @the back of my mind on a 220/200/whatever multiples of 20 they have or will come.

    Use better metallurgy in cylinders/valves.
    40k kms and a bore gone ???
    Pls Learn somethin from the Honda's. they go on forever

    FI has its own use , better metering , causing better burning , lower vibes/jerks and etc etc.
    Fi is something that doesn need poking around like a carb all the time . In 15k kms i havent had to touch the r15 even once.
    That was not the case when i had a carbed bike.after a service , tune it , not happy with this , or that n etc etc.
    when the bike is heated u dont find a loss in power on fi bikes , carbs its evident.(LC also helps no doubt).
    A better chassis that flex's less and is more rigid.
    reduce unnecessary dead weight where it can be reduced.

    I appreciate bajaj for whatever they have done till now , be it good or bad,

    Thing with us also is that, we want everything for less.
    r15 ppl say is overpriced , but it gives something which is class apart.
    If bajaj gives something for lesser , we complain quality is not good.
    For once we need to atleast appreciate what they are doing , they arent doing a cut copy paste job like HH does(agree that the product is good).
    Few more days, wait n watch.

    Santa
    Last edited by santoosh; 06-18-2009, 02:02 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • insanebiker
    replied
    Originally posted by KwokFist View Post
    That's usually the case.

    The current engine cant take the bike where it supposed to! A change is a must. Compared to the claimed HP, The bike much like others, makes lesser at the crank but worser at the wheel so it needs a lot more power to get to a true 145kph. But all that ccs is definitely giving it oodles of torque, which is its biggest advantage!
    U got anything to support that claim? We would prefer few dyno charts rather than mere comments.

    Leave a comment:


  • rahuldevnath
    replied
    FI basically boosts fuel efficiency. We never ride at a steady pace. We need to accelerate and de-accelerate constantly. During these transition periods, carb fuelling goes for a toss - petrol is a liquid and has inertia (much more than air) - it does not just like to suddenly flow or suddenly stop. Thus, air fuel ratio goes for a toss. And, FI helps in this case.
    Ok, Fuel Efficiency is fine.. but is that enough to shell out that much extra?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X