Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Tyres other than MRF for FZ16
Collapse
X
-
Tubing will solve the problem of continuous air leaks. But it will not serve the purpose of a TL tyre. Once there is puncture, the tyre will be flat in less than a minute.Originally posted by jasrox View PostMy problem is a little similar; cracks in the rear tyre and too many punctures of late. Close to 15k on the odo. Recently purchased the bike from my friend's friend (it was 14.4k on the odo when I bought it and 8 punctures till now!!!) Thought of buying a puncture kit but was confused about filling air when fixing the leak. So did not buy it.
The puncture walla says use a tube else you'll be shelling out Rs.100/- for each puncture and added that many FZ owners are using a tube now in their rear tyre. I am very confused - right now there 2 places where I got a leak. Add this to the above 8 and its ten!! I was thinking the tyre is good for another 10k km. In corners the grip is nice - but have felt a little skid in gravel and on not very good roads when breaking at normal speeds. (it wasn't happening when I bought it)
I am waiting for your helpful suggestions
1. Is using a tube a good option at all?
2. Can i go for a tube as a stop gap option and fit a new tubeless back again after say about 10k Km?
- Jasper
When I spoke to the senior mechanic at the local Yamaha svc, he said stock Revz have an average life of 15,000-16,000 kms. Anything beyond 17,000 is a bonus for the user. Meaning if we take good care and ride carefully, tyres last longer.
If your bike tyre gets flat every now and then or if it is in a bad condition, changing the tyre would a better option.
My bike is almost 3 years old and had 2 punctures. Both by nails that pierced the tyre within the inner grooves. I did not expect the stock tyres ( both front and rear) to last this long. They have tread more than 22,000 kms of roads. I am certain they will last for another 5000-7000 kms.
I usually fill 3 or 4 psi of extra nitrogen (I've filled nitrogen instead of air). The ride is a little bumpy. But thats ok for me.
Yes, you have to be extra careful on gravel roads and wet roads. Bad wet grip. The only option is to use a wise combination of the front disc and rear brakes. I have never ever been able to bring the bike to a complete stop using the rear brake alone.Last edited by danny king; 09-23-2011, 04:07 AM.Your bike is a part of you....
Since Nov 2012: Pulsar 200NS
Jan 2009 to Nov 2012: Yamaha FZ18
Comment
-
I've been using Motul FS oil since Aug 2010. No probs.Originally posted by SaiRam CBVS View PostDude one of my friend says that Michelin tyres are available for FZ 16 check them out, I will post the link if it is available and Motul 300V 15w 50 full synthes oil can be used because in winter seasons the tempertaures go low and using a 15W grade oil is good for the engine!
I've checked the Michelin India website. It does not list any tyre with FZ 16 specs. I really don't know if stores stock Michelin tyres that suit FZ. Could you check with your friend and post the details.
Last edited by danny king; 09-23-2011, 03:40 AM.Your bike is a part of you....
Since Nov 2012: Pulsar 200NS
Jan 2009 to Nov 2012: Yamaha FZ18
Comment
-
My bike is almost 3 years old and had 2 punctures. Both by nails that pierced the tyre within the inner grooves.Originally posted by antonysg View PostThis may be old topic, but i happened to stumble on this. I am planning to buy Fz16, but i am worried that i would be stuck with that 140/60 tyre without any options to improve mileage. The original 140/60 R17 is a radial tyre but seems to suffer more punctures due to low profile. Frankly that 140/60 tyre is overkill for a 150cc.
Here is what i understand
140/60 = Tyre width is 140 mm, height is 84 mm, frequent punctures on bad roads
140/70 = Tyre width is 140 mm, height is 98 mm, bad option i think
130/70 = Tyre width is 130 mm, height is 91 mm, better maybe
120/75 = Tyre width is 120 mm, height is 90 mm, Fz rim too wide for this?
110/80 = Tyre width is 110 mm, height is 88 mm, dazzler tyre, Fz rim too wide??
If you expect mileage from an FZ, then I sincerely suggest not to buy it. You can go for an SZ instead. Same engine tuned and tweaked to give mileage.
But recently, I met a guy who claimed, the FZ he bought in the recent past gives around 55 kms/l. I do not know if this is true.Last edited by danny king; 09-23-2011, 03:46 AM.Your bike is a part of you....
Since Nov 2012: Pulsar 200NS
Jan 2009 to Nov 2012: Yamaha FZ18
Comment
-
Yep, tubing doesn't serve the purpose and that's one reason am still waiting to decide. Though am not really convinced the tyre is in a bad condition, I'll post a few pics of the rear tyre. You guys can tell me if its gotta go. And yes, it gets flat every now and then - which is frustrating.Originally posted by danny king View PostTubing will solve the problem of continuous air leaks. But it will not serve the purpose of a TL tyre. Once there is puncture, the tyre will be flat in less than a minute.
When I spoke to the senior mechanic at the local Yamaha svc, he said stock Revz have an average life of 15,000-16,000 kms. Anything beyond 17,000 is a bonus for the user. Meaning if we take good care and ride carefully, tyres last longer.
If your bike tyre gets flat every now and then or if it is in a bad condition, changing the tyre would a better option.
Ah, didn't know stocks are good till 15K. Thanks for that piece of info. And it's a little surprising to know they ain't good for even 25,000 km (as pointed out by the svc mechanic). In that case, buying a new Revz doesn't seem to be a good option. I don't know the previous owner's riding habits - that could be one reason for the tyre becoming bad by now.
What's your tyre choice for your bike?
Comment
-
My bike is over 22,000 kms now. Am still on the stock tyres.Originally posted by jasrox View PostYep, tubing doesn't serve the purpose and that's one reason am still waiting to decide. Though am not really convinced the tyre is in a bad condition, I'll post a few pics of the rear tyre. You guys can tell me if its gotta go. And yes, it gets flat every now and then - which is frustrating.
Ah, didn't know stocks are good till 15K. Thanks for that piece of info. And it's a little surprising to know they ain't good for even 25,000 km (as pointed out by the svc mechanic). In that case, buying a new Revz doesn't seem to be a good option. I don't know the previous owner's riding habits - that could be one reason for the tyre becoming bad by now.
What's your tyre choice for your bike?
As almost all the members of this site say, Pirelli Sport Demon 140/70 is a good option. Costs more than Revz. Definitely better than Revz. Being a soft compound tyre, it wears off faster than Revz. Another option is Continental ContiGo!. These are used on Honda CBR 250 as stock. ContiGo and Revz are almost the same price. Maybe little more than Revz.
Both Pirelli SD and ContiGo are available in most cities.Your bike is a part of you....
Since Nov 2012: Pulsar 200NS
Jan 2009 to Nov 2012: Yamaha FZ18
Comment
-
Danny, any idea about the cost and the average life of ContiGo and the Pirelli SD?Originally posted by danny king View PostMy bike is over 22,000 kms now. Am still on the stock tyres.
As almost all the members of this site say, Pirelli Sport Demon 140/70 is a good option. Costs more than Revz. Definitely better than Revz. Being a soft compound tyre, it wears off faster than Revz. Another option is Continental ContiGo!. These are used on Honda CBR 250 as stock. ContiGo and Revz are almost the same price. Maybe little more than Revz.
Both Pirelli SD and ContiGo are available in most cities.
Comment
-
Guys,
I personally cannot believe that 84mm sidewall is the reason for the punctures.
What about the following tyres. Why they don't have such complaints.
R15 - 100/80 x 17 - 80mm
Many bikes - 3.00 x 18 - 75mm
I only believe that the softer compound and stiffer suspension that causes more load on the tyre could be the reason.
If we follow the below, we can minimize punctures to a large extent.
- Change tyres 15,000 kms or 2 years. Worn out tread area will not be able to sweep away the obstacles.
- Regularly maintain the correct Air Pressure. Fill Nitrogen if possible. An under-filled tyre will sail over the obstacle allowing it pierce it but a correctly filled tyre will just spit out the obstacle.
This is the reason you should not ride close to trucks when the road is full of gravel. I had a damaged visor when one small stone flew right from the wheels of a truck
As far as alternatives, I see 140/70 x 17 as the best, though it kills the acceleration.Last edited by paray2x; 10-01-2011, 11:02 AM.
Comment
-
Hi,Originally posted by jasrox View PostDanny, any idea about the cost and the average life of ContiGo and the Pirelli SD?
Pirelli SD has a life (not average) of around 15,000 kms. Its a soft compound tyre. Wears out fast but gives good grip. Price should be between 3500 and 4000.
I'm not sure about ContiGo life because it's relatively new. Price between 2900 and 3300. Its a medium compound tyre.Last edited by danny king; 10-08-2011, 09:56 PM.Your bike is a part of you....
Since Nov 2012: Pulsar 200NS
Jan 2009 to Nov 2012: Yamaha FZ18
Comment
-
ContiGo has bad wet grip!Originally posted by danny king View PostI'm not sure about ContiGo life because it's relatively new. Price between 2900 and 3300. Its a medium compound tyre.
Karizma Parts Manual - https://picasaweb.google.com/1010125...rizmaCatalogue
Comment
-
Thanks for the information guys - haven't been on here for sometime now.
Anyways, recently spotted a FZ with a different looking tyre on his FZ. Spoke to the owner and he told me he had put P220's stock rear tyre onto his FZ's rear. Am not sure how good a choice that is - but he said it solved the problem of frequent punctures and informed the grip is good too.
Incidentally, just happened to see Samrath 619's suggestion here about the P220's rear tyre:
What do you think about the P220's tyre on FZ?
Comment
-
Hi there,Originally posted by coustoobh View PostI just completed 29000 K's on Pirelli SD 140/70 rear(14000 on SD) and front stocks(29000 K's).....I know 3 owner's who changed to SD and did good....
Please give your feed back on Pirelli SD......Your bike is a part of you....
Since Nov 2012: Pulsar 200NS
Jan 2009 to Nov 2012: Yamaha FZ18
Comment
-
I have just changed my rear tyre to Dunlop Tuff grip 140/70 - 17 after my MRF revzz developed a crack on Side walls...Originally posted by coustoobh View PostI just completed 29000 K's on Pirelli SD 140/70 rear(14000 on SD) and front stocks(29000 K's).....I know 3 owner's who changed to SD and did good....
I was anyways fed up of the MRF OE tyre .... it was always underpressure for one or the other reason...
This new tyre seems good and the bike is running smooth...
Comment




Comment