Wrong. If you go through all 110 pages of the ECER-22-05 standard, you will observe that it says –
4. MARKINGS
4.1. The protective helmets submitted for approval in conformity with paragraph 3.1. above shall bear:
4.1.1. On the helmet, the applicant's trade name or mark and an indication of the size and, if appropriate, an indication of the unsuitability of the lower face cover to offer any protection against impacts to the chin.
4.1.2. On the visor, the applicant=s trade name or mark and, if appropriate, an indication of the unsuitability of the visor for use during the hours of darkness or in conditions of poor visibility.
4.2. The visors submitted for approval in conformity with paragraph 3.2. above shall bear the applicant's trade name or mark and, if appropriate, an indication of the unsuitability of the visor for use during the hours of darkness or in conditions of poor visibility.
4.3. The marking shall not be placed within the main visibility area.
4.4. The marking shall be indelible, clearly legible and in readily accessible place.
My question – Whether LS2 markings match these? Does a sticker translate to indelible marking? If yes, how? If not, why not & isn’t that illegal?
It has been observed that the provisions relating to import of packaged commodities are governed by the Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977. As per Rule 6 of the said Rules, read with para 5 of the Chapter 1A: General Notes regarding Import Policy, ITC(HS) Schedule 1 of the Foreign Trade Policy, no pre-packaged commodity shall be allowed entry into the country, unless such packages comply with all of the provisions of the said Rules and in particular carry the declarations regarding name and address of the importer, name of the commodity, net quantity in terms of standard unit of weights and measures, month and year of packing or importation and maximum retail sale price.
Hope this is clear and doesn’t require any further explanation.
If you are so confident about getting the original helmet, why not attempt answering (logically) my questions at the end of this post?
There are several helmets costing less than Rs.10,000 (in UK) who score 5star rating in sharp review.
SHARP Helmets - Caberg Trip - Rs.9000
SHARP Helmets - Duchinni D832 - Rs.6000
SHARP Helmets - MT Revenge - Rs.6500
So by your logic, LS2FF396 that scores 4 star rating must be pathetic in comparison with these helmets. Right?
Now a list of questions from my side :
1. ECER rules say –
14.1. Every protective helmet placed on the market shall bear a clearly visible label with the following inscription in the national language, or at least one of the national languages of the country of destination.
This information shall contain:
"For adequate protection, this helmet must fit closely and be securely attached. Any helmet that has sustained a violent impact should be replaced"
For a ECER approved helmet, where is this information?
2. Is the FF351 model sold in India is actually FF351 or is it FF350?
3. If it is FF350, why is it being labeled as FF351?
4. If it is FF351, why is being claimed to have 4 star rating from Sharp review? When in fact it has scored only 1 star in this review?
5. Isn’t this misrepresentation of facts? If yes, why? If no, how?
6. ECER rules say –
14.3. Every protective helmet shall be clearly marked with its size and its maximum weight, to the nearest 50 grammes, as placed on the market. The maximum weight quoted should include all the accessories that are supplied with the helmets, within the packaging, as it is placed on the market, whether or not those accessories have actually been fitted to the helmet.
Why the LS weight varies 25-30% from the claimed weight? Does this mean that that particular helmet is not compliant? If it is non compliant, why is it labeled as compliant?
7. This is mislabeling and punishable under Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977. What is the answer about this?
Note : For those who don't know, @princesirohi and me are good friends. We have started this research as a part of effort of Pune xBhp team. I can vouch that Prince has no relation; financial or otherwise; with Laxmi Auto.



Comment