Since '02 xBhp is different things to different people. From a close knit national community of bikers to India's only motorcycling lifestyle magazine and a place to make like-minded biker friends. Join us

Castrol Power 1

Avoid staying around those big vehicles.

Our Partner

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pulsar 200 NS Owners Review and Experiences

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Vipergts07
    replied
    Re: Pulsar 200 NS Owners Review and Experiences

    Originally posted by samy_jk View Post
    Yes mate @[emoji106], NS200 is robust & has good built quality - just experienced from a recent accident few days ago.
    You OK? And were you being cynical about the build quality?

    Leave a comment:


  • samy_jk
    replied
    Re: Pulsar 200 NS Owners Review and Experiences

    Originally posted by Chethan200 View Post
    Guys , I bought NS200 , a month back , till now everything is normal , i am happy with bike .

    I have a doubt , when does radiator fan starts? i see its not turning on even after 15-16km continuous highway ride at below 75kmph ride.
    is it an issue ? or it is normal?
    Just keep the engine idle for few mts in a hot sunny climate preferably in a traffic - you would feel the heat from the radiator when it kicks in!

    Leave a comment:


  • samy_jk
    replied
    Re: Pulsar 200 NS Owners Review and Experiences

    Originally posted by varungzb View Post
    Hi friends, i've just sold off my pulsar 200ns 2015 model after clocking 95k kms. I think i am eligible enough now to comment on its pros and cons. I've now purchased a rtr2004v ABS and i'll comment about it too in the end of this post.


    Pros


    1. In engine, vibrations are there, a lot. But that's its characteristic as its a rev happy engine and i have ran it at 120kmph on Agra Yamuna expressway for 2hrs continuosly. No signs of engine overheating ever.
    2. Best in segment Engine Power
    2. Build quality of 200ns is way better than rtr2004v. I don't know what's wrong with the reviews on youtube, which says rtr200 better than 200ns. Pulsar 200ns is more robust, for example, its tyre hugger is build over a solid metal bracket, which, in my case, sustained impact of two cars in a single accident from the rear. Bike didn't suffered any damage at all.
    3. Very beautiful instrument cluster backlit illumination
    4. Long life - myself covered 95,000 km without piston-ring change, without clutch plate change, just 1 chainset change (@55k km), 1 time CDI change, without magnet change , just 1 radiator fan change. Even the clutch and brake levers didn't loose paint in 4years and 95k kms.
    5. Completed a leh-ladakh trip, ofcourse after a specialized service in leh itself.
    6. Due to plain design, the bike is easy to clean everyday.
    7. On curves, 200NS is very planted due to stiffer suspension


    Cons


    1. Not for DIY people. Service and repairing is very complicated. Road-side mechanics can not repair it. e.g. Air filter and main spark plug are placed below fuel tank, which is absolutly idiotic. You need to unmount the whole fuel tank to access the spark plug or air filter or to set tappet. That's the sole reason i didn't bought Dominar, after selling the 200NS.
    2. CDI is not reliable, in my case. On the highway, when radiator fan went kaput, my bike lost ignition current on the highway due to fault in CDI caused by the fan. It may be a one-off case but still worth mentioning.
    3. High seat height. Not for short riders. I am 5'9"
    4. Absolutely no place to add accessories like extra horn, aux lights, mobile charger, switches. I somehow managed to add all these but that was a very tight fit.
    5. Weak headlight
    6. Gear lever needs to be changed every 10k-15K kms, in my case. This is a design defect which gradually reduces the grip to move the gear shaft and it is a serious issue.
    7. Hard seat cushioning. I had to add a 2inch foam sheet to the rider seat.
    8. Rattles for the first 20k kms and rear brake sqeaky sound after every rear brake-pad change




    How's it compared to Apache rtr2004v: Overall, i strongly feel that after selecting rtr2004v over 200NS, i've actually downgraded. The rtr200 is not durable as its flimsy parts suggests. The slipper clutch lever is light by 15%-20%, if compared to 200NS. Yes, rtr200 dual channel ABS comes as a saviour and Soft suspension in rtr200 gives better side quality by about 5%-10%. Fuel economy is also similar.


    If you are over 5.6, and intends to ride it in a city (due to avaliability of good mechanics) then choose 200NS otherwise look at other options. Happy Riding.
    Yes mate @[emoji106], NS200 is robust & has good built quality - just experienced from a recent accident few days ago.

    Leave a comment:


  • Anuj Agarwal
    replied
    Re: Pulsar 200 NS Owners Review and Experiences

    Originally posted by Chethan200 View Post
    Guys , I bought NS200 , a month back , till now everything is normal , i am happy with bike .

    I have a doubt , when does radiator fan starts? i see its not turning on even after 15-16km continuous highway ride at below 75kmph ride.
    is it an issue ? or it is normal?
    Yep absolutely normal, NS isn't like KTM bikes where you often see or hear the fan turning on... The radiator sometimes works silently that you don't even notice while you ride and also it works only when you ride in bumper to bumper traffic at 2-8kmph for about 25-30mins

    Everything is normal and you will not listen the fan going on everytime unlike other bikes

    Leave a comment:


  • Chethan200
    replied
    Re: Pulsar 200 NS Owners Review and Experiences

    Guys , I bought NS200 , a month back , till now everything is normal , i am happy with bike .

    I have a doubt , when does radiator fan starts? i see its not turning on even after 15-16km continuous highway ride at below 75kmph ride.
    is it an issue ? or it is normal?

    Leave a comment:


  • Santosh Nair
    replied
    Re: Pulsar 200 NS Owners Review and Experiences

    Originally posted by ALI.R View Post
    That applies to almost every bike in the segment.
    I have only ridden NS200 till now. Initially when I faced this problem, I came back to this thread for the same. That time, I read a lot of reviews stating they were experiencing it more than other bikes that they have owned. So I formed this idea from that. Maybe I am wrong about this.

    Leave a comment:


  • #bpk
    replied
    Re: Pulsar 200 NS Owners Review and Experiences

    Originally posted by ALI.R View Post
    That applies to almost every bike in the segment.
    True [emoji137]

    Leave a comment:


  • ALI.R
    replied
    Re: Pulsar 200 NS Owners Review and Experiences

    Originally posted by Santosh Nair View Post
    +1 on all the points.
    I would add a con that it sways on highways, when heavy vehicles pass by.
    That applies to almost every bike in the segment.

    Leave a comment:


  • Santosh Nair
    replied
    Re: Pulsar 200 NS Owners Review and Experiences

    Originally posted by varungzb View Post
    Hi friends, i've just sold off my pulsar 200ns 2015 model after clocking 95k kms. I think i am eligible enough now to comment on its pros and cons. I've now purchased a rtr2004v ABS and i'll comment about it too in the end of this post.


    Pros


    1. In engine, vibrations are there, a lot. But that's its characteristic as its a rev happy engine and i have ran it at 120kmph on Agra Yamuna expressway for 2hrs continuosly. No signs of engine overheating ever.
    2. Best in segment Engine Power
    2. Build quality of 200ns is way better than rtr2004v. I don't know what's wrong with the reviews on youtube, which says rtr200 better than 200ns. Pulsar 200ns is more robust, for example, its tyre hugger is build over a solid metal bracket, which, in my case, sustained impact of two cars in a single accident from the rear. Bike didn't suffered any damage at all.
    3. Very beautiful instrument cluster backlit illumination
    4. Long life - myself covered 95,000 km without piston-ring change, without clutch plate change, just 1 chainset change (@55k km), 1 time CDI change, without magnet change , just 1 radiator fan change. Even the clutch and brake levers didn't loose paint in 4years and 95k kms.
    5. Completed a leh-ladakh trip, ofcourse after a specialized service in leh itself.
    6. Due to plain design, the bike is easy to clean everyday.
    7. On curves, 200NS is very planted due to stiffer suspension


    Cons


    1. Not for DIY people. Service and repairing is very complicated. Road-side mechanics can not repair it. e.g. Air filter and main spark plug are placed below fuel tank, which is absolutly idiotic. You need to unmount the whole fuel tank to access the spark plug or air filter or to set tappet. That's the sole reason i didn't bought Dominar, after selling the 200NS.
    2. CDI is not reliable, in my case. On the highway, when radiator fan went kaput, my bike lost ignition current on the highway due to fault in CDI caused by the fan. It may be a one-off case but still worth mentioning.
    3. High seat height. Not for short riders. I am 5'9"
    4. Absolutely no place to add accessories like extra horn, aux lights, mobile charger, switches. I somehow managed to add all these but that was a very tight fit.
    5. Weak headlight
    6. Gear lever needs to be changed every 10k-15K kms, in my case. This is a design defect which gradually reduces the grip to move the gear shaft and it is a serious issue.
    7. Hard seat cushioning. I had to add a 2inch foam sheet to the rider seat.
    8. Rattles for the first 20k kms and rear brake sqeaky sound after every rear brake-pad change




    How's it compared to Apache rtr2004v: Overall, i strongly feel that after selecting rtr2004v over 200NS, i've actually downgraded. The rtr200 is not durable as its flimsy parts suggests. The slipper clutch lever is light by 15%-20%, if compared to 200NS. Yes, rtr200 dual channel ABS comes as a saviour and Soft suspension in rtr200 gives better side quality by about 5%-10%. Fuel economy is also similar.


    If you are over 5.6, and intends to ride it in a city (due to avaliability of good mechanics) then choose 200NS otherwise look at other options. Happy Riding.
    +1 on all the points.
    I would add a con that it sways on highways, when heavy vehicles pass by.

    Leave a comment:


  • Chethan200
    replied
    Re: Pulsar 200 NS Owners Review and Experiences

    Guys , I bought NS200 , a month back , till now everything is normal , i am happy with bike .

    I have a doubt , when does radiator fan starts? i see its not turning on even after 15-16km continuous ride .
    is it an issue ? or it is normal?

    Please help me, i am new to this.

    Leave a comment:


  • varungzb
    replied
    Re: Pulsar 200 NS Owners Review and Experiences

    Hi friends, i've just sold off my pulsar 200ns 2015 model after clocking 95k kms. I think i am eligible enough now to comment on its pros and cons. I've now purchased a rtr2004v ABS and i'll comment about it too in the end of this post.


    Pros


    1. In engine, vibrations are there, a lot. But that's its characteristic as its a rev happy engine and i have ran it at 120kmph on Agra Yamuna expressway for 2hrs continuosly. No signs of engine overheating ever.
    2. Best in segment Engine Power
    2. Build quality of 200ns is way better than rtr2004v. I don't know what's wrong with the reviews on youtube, which says rtr200 better than 200ns. Pulsar 200ns is more robust, for example, its tyre hugger is build over a solid metal bracket, which, in my case, sustained impact of two cars in a single accident from the rear. Bike didn't suffered any damage at all.
    3. Very beautiful instrument cluster backlit illumination
    4. Long life - myself covered 95,000 km without piston-ring change, without clutch plate change, just 1 chainset change (@55k km), 1 time CDI change, without magnet change , just 1 radiator fan change. Even the clutch and brake levers didn't loose paint in 4years and 95k kms.
    5. Completed a leh-ladakh trip, ofcourse after a specialized service in leh itself.
    6. Due to plain design, the bike is easy to clean everyday.
    7. On curves, 200NS is very planted due to stiffer suspension


    Cons


    1. Not for DIY people. Service and repairing is very complicated. Road-side mechanics can not repair it. e.g. Air filter and main spark plug are placed below fuel tank, which is absolutly idiotic. You need to unmount the whole fuel tank to access the spark plug or air filter or to set tappet. That's the sole reason i didn't bought Dominar, after selling the 200NS.
    2. CDI is not reliable, in my case. On the highway, when radiator fan went kaput, my bike lost ignition current on the highway due to fault in CDI caused by the fan. It may be a one-off case but still worth mentioning.
    3. High seat height. Not for short riders. I am 5'9"
    4. Absolutely no place to add accessories like extra horn, aux lights, mobile charger, switches. I somehow managed to add all these but that was a very tight fit.
    5. Weak headlight
    6. Gear lever needs to be changed every 10k-15K kms, in my case. This is a design defect which gradually reduces the grip to move the gear shaft and it is a serious issue.
    7. Hard seat cushioning. I had to add a 2inch foam sheet to the rider seat.
    8. Rattles for the first 20k kms and rear brake sqeaky sound after every rear brake-pad change




    How's it compared to Apache rtr2004v: Overall, i strongly feel that after selecting rtr2004v over 200NS, i've actually downgraded. The rtr200 is not durable as its flimsy parts suggests. The slipper clutch lever is light by 15%-20%, if compared to 200NS. Yes, rtr200 dual channel ABS comes as a saviour and Soft suspension in rtr200 gives better side quality by about 5%-10%. Fuel economy is also similar.


    If you are over 5.6, and intends to ride it in a city (due to avaliability of good mechanics) then choose 200NS otherwise look at other options. Happy Riding.

    Leave a comment:


  • Santosh Nair
    replied
    Re: Pulsar 200 NS Owners Review and Experiences

    Originally posted by kany1991 View Post
    Buy masseter X for rear and fx1 for front
    Thanks Kany, I will look for masseter X rear.

    Leave a comment:


  • kany1991
    replied
    Re: Pulsar 200 NS Owners Review and Experiences

    Originally posted by Santosh Nair View Post
    Getting a new set of tyres. I read reviews for mrf so thought of going for front: Zapper FX 1 TL and rear: Zapper Q TL. Just wanted to know whether is this combo good for moderate drive under generally dry terrain(Mostly used in Gujarat).

    Thanks in advance!
    Buy masseter X for rear and fx1 for front

    Leave a comment:


  • shyamsundar.gopi
    replied
    Re: Pulsar 200 NS Owners Review and Experiences

    Originally posted by vivek7593 View Post
    Got it from alibaba ?
    Short or long ones ?

    Sent from my AO5510 using xBhp Connect mobile app
    Hi guys I just bought the metallic mesh for Rs 50 and removed the existing radiator guard and placed my mesh correctly and again placed the radiator guard it has been doing its job perfectly...

    Leave a comment:


  • Santosh Nair
    replied
    Re: Pulsar 200 NS Owners Review and Experiences

    Getting a new set of tyres. I read reviews for mrf so thought of going for front: Zapper FX 1 TL and rear: Zapper Q TL. Just wanted to know whether is this combo good for moderate drive under generally dry terrain(Mostly used in Gujarat).

    Thanks in advance!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X