NO, products must be better, and yes P180 UG4 is much better than its earlier upgrade. But it shouldn't de-value its higher siblings. As told earlier, why copy the elder siblings exactly?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2009 Pulsar 180 UG IV : Details out
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
@payeng- I am tempted to reply but I wont
Last edited by Technocrat; 05-26-2009, 05:38 PM.Racing Throttle Response
Comment
-
Originally posted by fast_ferocious View PostThat was an error, edited.
You mean that one feels cool if a lesser cc pulsar is given the looks of one's greater cc pulsar
?. hah! Go ask the pulsar 200 users around you(except those die hard fans like devilpulsarian), and know how disappointed they're with bajaj. Even our favorite mod Aryan da was not that happy when this upgrade was first forecasted. Its a natural instinct you see.
You were so desperate to listen from me ........wernt u....
Anyways, what about those guys who bought "unicorn" considering they would become big "wing riders"......and than honda launched a much better looking STUNNER....?
Werent those guyz disappointed...?
Its just that honda manages to sell around 20-25k unis + stunners per month that there are lesser in numbers....who would put there disappointments here....!
What about those guys who just bought an apache 160 and than they are hearing that a same looking 180 is on the cards....!
what about those guys who just purchased the carb stunner.....and heard the news about a new FI stunner....laucnhed.....
Werent they disappointed...?2002 - Pulsar 150 Classic (Still owned)
2005 - Pulsar 150 Dtsi (Still owned)
2006 - Eterno (sold)
2008 - Dio (Owned)
2009 - Pulsar 220 DTSi
Comment
-
Originally posted by fast_ferocious View PostNO, products must be better, and yes P180 UG4 is much better than its earlier upgrade. But it shouldn't de-value its higher siblings. As told earlier, why copy the elder siblings exactly?
Maybe because there is no law in India which prohibits companies from doing so..
Move on.. why so Serious..??
Comment
-
@ Fast_ferocious
This was my last reply to u, the one for which u still dont have an answer.Originally posted by insanebiker View PostHmmmm. Why are people who are not affected cribbing?
Okay, now coming to ur point lets take the Honda Unicorn.
The current lot is called the "4th Gen" Unicorn.
And i beleive it s called so because they are "Upgrades".
Can u tell me how many parts differ from the 1st Gen to the current 4th gen?
Nobody cribbed about these kinda upgrades but now when it comes to Bajaj , everyone is like
to crib about it!

Originally posted by insanebiker View PostAnd BTW, u seem to have no answer for my last reply to u
When everything comes ur way, u r in the wrong way ;)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Technocrat View Post^^ wrong examples- Stunner & Unicorn are completly different bikes. 160 & 180 look similar just like P150 & P180
Its all about getting disappointed......
A man can get disaapointed with anything he feel like.....
Afterall its all about one smaller capacity bike looking equal than a biger capacity bike...
whereas condition with unicorners is even worse....
They get a 125cc BIGGER in looks (and not even equal) than a 150cc...
How punny they might be feeling is an altogether diffrent case now....
Anyways....Its true that this upgrade will make existing p200 riders feel a bit equalled...(only superficially)
But as somebody else may feel otherwise....but I feel its much much much much much better than taking 2ks for painting the bike red and orange.....!2002 - Pulsar 150 Classic (Still owned)
2005 - Pulsar 150 Dtsi (Still owned)
2006 - Eterno (sold)
2008 - Dio (Owned)
2009 - Pulsar 220 DTSi
Comment
-
-
Hello Mr? Uni and Stunner are two completely different looking bikes. Why will a Uni owner feel the heat when a bike with different(ya may be better) looks is launched? Its not a copy of their uni body with a lesser power engine and a with a lower price tag.Originally posted by Devilpulsarian View PostAnyways, what about those guys who bought "unicorn" considering they would become big "wing riders"......and than honda launched a much better looking STUNNER....?
Werent those guyz disappointed...?
Dear O Dear O Dear, I've been explaining you for atleast half a dozen pages that the problem is NOT with new features, its with sharing the parts of higher siblings, rather than introducing some new designs. I said, the introduction of the Clipons, fatter rear tyres, refined engine are most welcomed in UG 4.Originally posted by Devilpulsarian View Postwhat about those guys who just purchased the carb stunner.....and heard the news about a new FI stunner....laucnhed.....
Werent they disappointed...?From variable Bhps to a constant 17.6 Bhp.
Comment
-
And i am telling u half a dozen times too, that Bajaj deliberately shares few parts amongst the Pulsar range to maintain the "Pulsar" brand image.Originally posted by fast_ferocious View PostDear O Dear O Dear, I've been explaining you for atleast half a dozen pages that the problem is NOT with new features, its with sharing the parts of higher siblings, rather than introducing some new designs.
What sense does it make if we have different radical designs under the same brand "Pulsar" ? Tell me!When everything comes ur way, u r in the wrong way ;)
Comment
-
^ seems like a custom paint jobsigpicThe Moto Cafe - India's first bike theme cafe @ Chandni Chowk
The Moto Cafe video -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6XztkK4ej2U
My Youtube channel
http://www.youtube.com/user/niksdevil666
Comment
-
GOD....should the 1098/1198 owners kill Ducati for making the lookalike 848? ... should gixxer750 owners kill Suzuki for making the lookalike gixxer600? Pleeeeeease!!!
And there will always be someone at somewhere in the world who would have bought a bike just before its upgrade will hit the market! So stop cribbing about it!!The Chronicles of Motorcycling - The Man, The Machine and The Road
Comment



Comment