Duke 390, by continuation, is also a city centric bike (Naked, small fuel tank, worse aerodynamics, Top-Speed close to that managed by CBR250R *in all probability*.)
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
KTM Duke 390 ABS Unveiled EDIT: Caught testing near Pune. Pics on page#57
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Probably because BAL penny-pinched when buying the tyres. Also because the price difference is still significant (NS is priced ~15k more). You never know what would happen if they move down the displacement ladder on the 200NS platform.Originally posted by MG View Post
Duke 200 probably loses out to the CBR250R due to worse aerodynamics (naked) and much much shorter gearing. It was optimized as a city bike and thats where it is better than the others. Top Speed is not such a big consideration for a city centric bike, how you reach there is more important. Even the 21 Ps P220 can match the Duke if top speed is the only consideration. The difference here is how you reach your top-speed.Originally posted by Praful View Post
Duke 390, by continuation, is also a city centric bike (Naked, small fuel tank, worse aerodynamics, Top-Speed close to that managed by CBR250R *in all probability*.)Last edited by antz.bin; 11-28-2012, 12:18 PM.Advice is a form of nostalgia.
Dispensing it is a way of fishing the past from the disposal, wiping it off, painting over the ugly parts and recycling it for more than it's worth.
Antz Travelz!! | South India Exploration Ride | Leh Triplog (Work in progress)
-
Obviously I'm not talking about top speed, the top speed for each of these two bikes is well known.Originally posted by antz.bin View PostTop Speed is not such a big consideration for a city centric bike, how you reach there is more important.
I meant in a quarter mile, I don't think the Duke 200 is ahead despite its close ratio quick shift gear box and ultra light weight.
The kind of speeds these bikes would reach in a quarter mile, I don't think aerodynamics would play that big a factor.Last edited by Praful; 11-28-2012, 12:56 PM._________________________
LoneWolfRides©
Comment
-
Probably because you waste time in shifting through the extremely close ratio gearbox. Each gearshift costs you precious fractions of a second. But then the same close ratio gearbox gives it better Roll-On timings (which is more essential in the city compared to 0-100 and quarter mile timings).Originally posted by Praful View PostObviously I'm not talking about top speed, the top speed for each of these two bikes is well known.
I meant in a quarter mile, I don't think the Duke 200 is ahead despite its close ratio quick shift gear box and ultra light weight.Advice is a form of nostalgia.
Dispensing it is a way of fishing the past from the disposal, wiping it off, painting over the ugly parts and recycling it for more than it's worth.
Antz Travelz!! | South India Exploration Ride | Leh Triplog (Work in progress)
Comment
-
Main reasons will be:Originally posted by Praful View PostObviously I'm not talking about top speed, the top speed for each of these two bikes is well known.
I meant in a quarter mile, I don't think the Duke 200 is ahead despite its close ratio quick shift gear box and ultra light weight.
1.Higher torque
2.Better Aerodynamics.
3.time loss in shifting more times in duke while reaching to same speed (say 100)
With very optimized shifts there is nothing between these two till 100, beyond that wind resistance, and lower torque will keep the duke on the back bench.
CBR 250 R is a bike with 'R' tag and 25% larger combustion chamber.Last edited by kochumvk; 11-28-2012, 01:24 PM.
Comment
-
Duke 200: Bore X stroke - 72X49 mm
Duke 390: Bore X stroke - 89X60 mm
Experts, What does a "short geared' mean to a layman. Is it much more frequent shifting of gears wrt to rmp/speed? need to understand if duke 390 would be as short geared as 200? will we have to shift gears very quicky and frequently, esp in city riding? I am coming from a bullet clan, and my C5 does not force me to shift gears as often. Will i have problems adjusting to gear shifting pattern of Duke 390?
Comment
-
Gee I missed the words "dnt".. i.e. I wouldnt be surprised to see the CB250 street version being sent to India if the Duke 390 starts attacking the 250R.Originally posted by MG View PostBy your logic FZ/FZ-S should have been history by now since NS is already here and unlike CBR250 and Duke 390 both belongs to the same design form i.e streetfighter
Both will sell.. Sales if a function of many things. Price being just one factor.
If you had 6L, what will you buy. A Hyosung GT650, A Harley Davidon, or will you save up for a KTM
Originally posted by Praful View PostJust a thought, the Duke 200 as exciting it is to ride. Think about the fact that it weighs 125 Kgs makes 25PS, by that P/W ratio the bike should blazing fast in comparison to say the CBR250 which makes almost the same power and weighs 30Kgs more. But that is far from reality!
I'd take the 44Hp figure with a slight pinch of salt."Fast" in terms of acceleration thanks to the short stroke nature.Originally posted by nasirkaka View PostDuke 200: Bore X stroke - 72X49 mm
Duke 390: Bore X stroke - 89X60 mm
Experts, What does a "short geared' mean to a layman. Is it much more frequent shifting of gears wrt to rmp/speed? need to understand if duke 390 would be as short geared as 200? will we have to shift gears very quicky and frequently, esp in city riding? I am coming from a bullet clan, and my C5 does not force me to shift gears as often. Will i have problems adjusting to gear shifting pattern of Duke 390?
By Short geared ratios he meant having to shift gears fast. Imagine the exact opposite of the RE.
Torquey mills are geared shorter to mechanically restrict the acceleration in the lower gears (and in case of Duke 125, may be make it seem faster)
Fiddle with the primary ratios and wheelie all the way! Yay!Super CommuTOURer� - Talk less, Ride more
.: FB :.|.: TW :.|*IG*| Ex PowerDrift:.
#Give thy opinion, write em, dont throw em
#Everyone errs, accept it, defending/cribbing about it only makes it worse
#Dont defend a manufacturer as if you work for them
#Write. Think. If relevant hit submit. If not hit yourself
#Be kind in your choice of words, you never know who would make you gulp em
� Satyen Poojary
Comment
-
Short gearing refers to the need to shift gears faster than normal. What this provides? It gives immense acceleration than a normal geared ride, but what is the con? It loses out on top speed. Take the CBR 250 R and duke for example. Both share the same 25 Ps of torque, but the CBR is normal geared, while duke is short geared. So this makes the duke to have a tiny edge, over the CBR in terms of acceleration, but thats only upto the 100~110km/h mark. By then Duke would have already hit the 6th gear, while CBR will be doing it easily on the 5th. So, the Duke will run out of steam by 136(approx) and be unable to hit higher top speed, but the CBR can hit 140's easily with just a shift to the 6th and cruise easily on such speeds too. Duke 390(30:80) will be having a higher gear ratio than the 200(22:72), so it won't be short geared like the 200. Still it won't be like your Bullets or cruisers because, those are torquey machines. It will take some time for you to get accustomed to these rides.Originally posted by nasirkaka View PostDuke 200: Bore X stroke - 72X49 mm
Duke 390: Bore X stroke - 89X60 mm
Experts, What does a "short geared' mean to a layman. Is it much more frequent shifting of gears wrt to rmp/speed? need to understand if duke 390 would be as short geared as 200? will we have to shift gears very quicky and frequently, esp in city riding? I am coming from a bullet clan, and my C5 does not force me to shift gears as often. Will i have problems adjusting to gear shifting pattern of Duke 390?2013 R15(Sold) | 2014 Duke 390 (Sold) | 2022 Adv 390 | 2022 Ninja 300
Comment
-
Waiting, waiting, waiting.
Cheers!
VJ
Once upon a time, a guy asked a girl 'Will you marry me?'
The girl said, 'NO!'
And the guy lived happily ever after and rode motorcycles and watched sport on a big screen TV, went fishing and surfing, and played golf a lot, and drank beer and scotch and had tons of money in the bank and left the toilet seat up and farted whenever he wanted.
THE END
Comment
-
Thanks satyenpoojary and Ezilkannan for the explanation on short geared. And personally good for me that 390 is geared taller compared to 200.
I have been looking for a 2nd bike mainly for city and short single day trips, as i find the C5 grossly underpowered, heavy, and unrefined for daily commuting in Bangalore traffic. Will keep the C5 for longer rides, and when with pillion. Been waiting desperately for duke 390 to hit the showroom.
Given that the 390 generates a healthy torque as well for its weight, will it be feasible to run the bike at lower speeds at higher gear (1<5), without lugging?
Comment
-
replied in line.Originally posted by antz.bin View PostProbably because BAL penny-pinched when buying the tyres. Also because the price difference is still significant (NS is priced ~15k more). You never know what would happen if they move down the displacement ladder on the 200NS platform.
Down the line.. the decade old pulsar 150 still outsells the "brand new" FZ!! :P
Duke 200 probably loses out to the CBR250R due to worse aerodynamics (naked) and much much shorter gearing. It was optimized as a city bike and thats where it is better than the others. Top Speed is not such a big consideration for a city centric bike, how you reach there is more important. Even the 21 Ps P220 can match the Duke if top speed is the only consideration. The difference here is how you reach your top-speed.
The duke 200 is slower than the CBR by .24secs which makes no difference in real world conditions.. and according to xbhp the CBR is actually slower..Regardless, Life shall go on.
Comment
-
Given the amount of power it has, it should be able to do some good low speeds without lugging but not to the point that a C5 would be able to. A word of caution, don't ride it like your C5. This will be different ride altogether. You'll get used to it, once you keep riding it regularly.Originally posted by nasirkaka View PostThanks satyenpoojary and Ezilkannan for the explanation on short geared. And personally good for me that 390 is geared taller compared to 200.
I have been looking for a 2nd bike mainly for city and short single day trips, as i find the C5 grossly underpowered, heavy, and unrefined for daily commuting in Bangalore traffic. Will keep the C5 for longer rides, and when with pillion. Been waiting desperately for duke 390 to hit the showroom.
Given that the 390 generates a healthy torque as well for its weight, will it be feasible to run the bike at lower speeds at higher gear (1<5), without lugging?2013 R15(Sold) | 2014 Duke 390 (Sold) | 2022 Adv 390 | 2022 Ninja 300
Comment
-
Yeah in real world with minor difference, the rider is the deciding factor, his precision in execution, but even milli seconds count for the track yeah I am not saying we have a track in every district, but the duke is homologated for the track. Then again, in stock set-up, I have all my doubts, CBR will clock an inferior lap time with stock equipment.Originally posted by yellowspunk View Postreplied in line.
There is not much point in comparing these two bikes any way, they are radically different, serves different purposes, excels in its own departments.
Lets come back to 390
I would like to clear my doubt, Is Duke 390 coming with a new four piston caliper at front?Last edited by kochumvk; 11-29-2012, 12:21 PM.
Comment



Comment