Since '02 xBhp is different things to different people. From a close knit national community of bikers to India's only motorcycling lifestyle magazine and a place to make like-minded biker friends. Join us

Castrol Power 1

Red to green – let the cager go first.

Our Partner

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

KTM 200 Duke

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Anyone made up his mind for the Orange day at Wadala? I might just turn up to soak it all in. Racing is out of question as I have no gears at the moment and I don't think I'd like renting them for racing.

    PS : the last time I was at the svc I noticed something in the demo bike of the Vashi KTM which was parked there. It's shocker was perfectly alright. No paint chipping or anything. The exhaust was also very much Brassy in colour. I asked the engineer and he told that the first lot had no paint chipping issues. It only started when the vendor who manufactures the shockers altered the paint specifications after the first lot.
    True the demo rides given are nowhere close to rear world rides, but the bike is used by the KTM vashi staff for their personal/work related commutes around town. Like going to the RTO /SVC and places. So no chipping at all surprised me.
    May be if the vendor reverts to the old specs, the problem would vanish?
    The hero always RIDES into the sunset!

    My Touring Logs-
    French Riviera
    https://www.xbhp.com/talkies/tourer/38345-biking-french-riviera.html
    Scotland-
    http://www.xbhp.com/talkies/tourer/3...-3600-kms.html
    France -Normandy and Paris on the CBR
    http://www.xbhp.com/talkies/tourer/3...adventure.html
    KTM chronicles-
    http://www.xbhp.com/talkies/tourer/2...hronicles.html

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Doga View Post
      Anyone made up his mind for the Orange day at Wadala? I might just turn up to soak it all in. Racing is out of question as I have no gears at the moment and I don't think I'd like renting them for racing.

      PS : the last time I was at the svc I noticed something in the demo bike of the Vashi KTM which was parked there. It's shocker was perfectly alright. No paint chipping or anything. The exhaust was also very much Brassy in colour. I asked the engineer and he told that the first lot had no paint chipping issues. It only started when the vendor who manufactures the shockers altered the paint specifications after the first lot.
      True the demo rides given are nowhere close to rear world rides, but the bike is used by the KTM vashi staff for their personal/work related commutes around town. Like going to the RTO /SVC and places. So no chipping at all surprised me.
      May be if the vendor reverts to the old specs, the problem would vanish?
      This is true. Because it's a new bike, Bajaj generally experiments with OEM supplier for the best price to quality/performance/reliability ratio. Eventually everything settles down. This applies to every bit of the bike.
      Been There, Done That; Better!

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Doga View Post
        I asked the engineer and he told that the first lot had no paint chipping issues. It only started when the vendor who manufactures the shockers altered the paint specifications after the first lot.
        FYI, my bike is from the first delivery lot and my monoshock paint is peeling. Probably, shock specs are different on the demo bikes.
        I like 'em Naked

        Blah Blah Blah!

        Reason is not automatic. Those who choose not to recognise it, can't be conquered by it.
        - Ayn Rand, in 'Atlas Shrugged'

        Comment


        • Khat khat sound from the rear

          Originally posted by NikhilB View Post
          FYI, my bike is from the first delivery lot and my monoshock paint is peeling. Probably, shock specs are different on the demo bikes.
          Hi. probably true.
          Btw I indicated the wrong screws in the picture which I posted. The screws are in a pair which sit further ahead towards the rear. will post a picture soon.
          And hey I agree now that the fender does brush the rear mud guard. But the noise does lessen a lot after tightening the screws I am referring too.

          So probably the sound is caused by a combination of these two factors.
          Last edited by Doga; 09-21-2012, 03:51 PM.
          The hero always RIDES into the sunset!

          My Touring Logs-
          French Riviera
          https://www.xbhp.com/talkies/tourer/38345-biking-french-riviera.html
          Scotland-
          http://www.xbhp.com/talkies/tourer/3...-3600-kms.html
          France -Normandy and Paris on the CBR
          http://www.xbhp.com/talkies/tourer/3...adventure.html
          KTM chronicles-
          http://www.xbhp.com/talkies/tourer/2...hronicles.html

          Comment


          • Hello all.

            Around a week back, when i signed up for xbhp forums, i had an almost exclusively negative review of the duke, which goes as follows (had it typed in notepad).

            List of my grievances:
            - Horrible turning circle (i feel some cars take less than that). I don't know why no one mentions this
            - The chain started making weird rattling sounds in around 10 days of purchase.
            - The performance isn't a gigantic leap over existing 200cc bikes as they have you believe on the internet. Not exactly thrilled.
            - The ride is hard
            - The stock handlebar grips are capable of peeling skin off your hands (very coarse/sharp)
            - Fuel tank leakage issue. I haven't tested it myself but the khivraj motors representative told me that if i go over 9 liters, the fuel will spill over. And considering that some (conservative) people advice never to go under 3L for FI engine, it only gives you a 6 liters window to operate in. Combined with not so great fuel efficiency (i don't really care about this otherwise), it means very frequent visits to gas station. It gets annoying.
            - The engine is HOT. 10-15 minutes of riding (at any speed) and engine gets quite toasty. Not a very good experience for my legs.

            This review was written with 400km, 2 weeks of riding experience. KTM suggests break in period of 1000km under 7k rpm and I was (not so willingly) keeping myself to under 8k till i wrote the review, but after that, i got very annoyed and had a "**** it" moment (last weekend) and gave it the beans. That is the first time i felt that it wasn't a huge mistake to go with the Duke. The bike does get fun if you keep the revs sky high, so i'm now content with my decision.

            PS : This is the first bike i have bought. I had aspirations for a CBR600RR and was more than half way done saving up for one. But from what i read on the internet about imports and HMSI's (lack of) plans for CBR600 in india, i heavy heartedly decided to hold on for a while and buy a transitional bike. So, in short, my relationship with the Duke started off on a sour note and i was just generally annoyed with it. But if one grabs it with the scruff of it's neck and manhandles it, it does get a bit rewarding and for that reason, i've come to like my Duke now, despite the flaws i listed above.
            Last edited by dishayu; 02-18-2013, 07:34 PM. Reason: typos
            Bajaj Pulsar 150 : 2004-2005
            Honda Dio : 2005-2012
            KTM 200 Duke : 2012-
            Aprilia RSV4 APRC ABS : 2014-

            Comment


            • Originally posted by dishayu View Post
              Hello all.

              Around a week back, when i signed up for xbhp forums, i had an almost exclusively negative review of the duke, which goes as follows (had it typed in notepad).

              List of my grievances:
              - Horrible turning circle (i feel some cars take less than that). I don't know why no one mentions this
              .
              EVEN I agree to it .
              the turning radius is too much
              i wonder why is it so .
              FaceBook Id - Phaneendra Ch

              http://https://www.facebook.com/MightyDoc

              Comment


              • Originally posted by hunkofgals View Post
                EVEN I agree to it .
                the turning radius is too much
                i wonder why is it so .
                Are bhai, because the tank design limits it. Otherwise the handles would touch the tank. Now if you ask why KTM didn't give higher set handlebars then I won't be able to answer
                The hero always RIDES into the sunset!

                My Touring Logs-
                French Riviera
                https://www.xbhp.com/talkies/tourer/38345-biking-french-riviera.html
                Scotland-
                http://www.xbhp.com/talkies/tourer/3...-3600-kms.html
                France -Normandy and Paris on the CBR
                http://www.xbhp.com/talkies/tourer/3...adventure.html
                KTM chronicles-
                http://www.xbhp.com/talkies/tourer/2...hronicles.html

                Comment


                • Originally posted by dishayu View Post
                  Hello all.

                  Around a week back, when i signed up for xbhp forums, i had an almost exclusively negative review of the duke, which goes as follows (had it typed in notepad).

                  List of my grievances:
                  - Horrible turning circle (i feel some cars take less than that). I don't know why no one mentions this
                  ''horribly'' is a overly exaggerated word to use.The turning radius is not like a splendor but again very easy to maneuver after you have clocked a few 1000 KM and got a hang on it.Have you tried a CBR ? you will know what I am saying.

                  - The chain started making weird rattling sounds in around 10 days of purchase.
                  This can be caused if the chain is not cleaned and lubbed every 500 KM or as and when required, chain tension is not correct,there is a bad chain link,the sliders are not in the right position,chain might be rubbing against the sliders.It dosent matter if the bike is 10 days or 100 days old.

                  - The performance isn't a gigantic leap over existing 200cc bikes as they have you believe on the internet. Not exactly thrilled.
                  Yes not a leap as compared to a 600cc you wanted.People review are based on their experience or the bikes they have ridden.

                  - The ride is hard
                  You can adjust the suspension setting to better suite you.

                  - The stock handlebar grips are capable of peeling skin off your hands (very coarse/sharp)
                  Overly exaggerated again.You get used to it and wont complain after 5000 KM.IF not get a good pair of gloves or a cool orange grip.

                  - Fuel tank leakage issue. I haven't tested it myself but the knivraj motors representative told me that if i go over 9 liters, the full will spill over. And considering that some (conservative) people advice never to go under 3L for FI engine, it only gives you a 6 liters window to operate in. Combined with not so great fuel efficiency (i don't really care about this otherwise), it means very frequent visits to gas station. It gets annoying.
                  Where you not aware about the fuel efficiency before you bought the bike ? Ideally it would give 35 KM /L, if you rip the bike you can expect 30Km/l.It also depends on your riding style.The fuel tank is not leaking it is overflowing because you filled it up to the brim.

                  - The engine is HOT. 10-15 minutes of riding (at any speed) and engine gets quite toasty. Not a very good experience for my legs.
                  Yes the engine will become hot, but post 5000 KM it will drop drastically.Natural for a new bike.

                  This review was written with 400km, 2 weeks of riding experience. KTM suggests break in period of 1000km under 7k rpm and I was (not so willingly) keeping myself to under 8k till i wrote the review, but after that, i got very annoyed and had a "**** it" moment (last weekend) and gave it the beans. That is the first time i felt that it wasn't a huge mistake to go with the Duke. The bike does get fun if you keep the revs sky high, so i'm now content with my decision.

                  PS : This is the first bike i have bought. I had aspirations for a CBR600RR and was more than half way done saving up for one. But from what i read on the internet about imports and HMSI's (lack of) plans for CBR600 in india, i heavy heartedly decided to hold on for a while and buy a transitional bike. So, in short, my relationship with the Duke started off on a sour note and i was just generally annoyed with it. But if one grabs it with the scruff of it's neck and manhandles it, it does get a bit rewarding and for that reason, i've come to like my Duke now, despite the flaws i listed above.
                  My answer in bold
                  Last edited by Bplus; 09-21-2012, 08:34 PM.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by dishayu View Post

                    - The engine is HOT. 10-15 minutes of riding (at any speed) and engine gets quite toasty. Not a very good experience for my legs.
                    Winter season is coming, it will be quite useful at that time

                    Dont worry, things will get better after the first servicing.
                    2012 KTM Duke 200 ...Pure Love on two wheels <3

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by dishayu View Post
                      - Horrible turning circle (i feel some cars take less than that). I don't know why no one mentions this
                      some cars?wow.. its cause of the beefy wp usd forks.

                      - The performance isn't a gigantic leap over existing 200cc bikes as they have you believe on the internet. Not exactly thrilled.
                      What do you mean by performance? top speed? acceleration? cornering stability? this is an ownership thread, we know the performance of the duke and dont need the internet to tells us about the performance of the duke. Instead i think you got carried away by the internet so much that you got disappointed in the end due to your high expectations.

                      - The ride is hard
                      Softer rides usually end up having comparatively worse cornering performance.

                      - The stock handlebar grips are capable of peeling skin off your hands (very coarse/sharp)
                      Don't make me laugh man...

                      You just can't have everything you want in one bike. Din't you like the cbr 250r? thats more like the cbr 600rr. or the ninja 250r. I feel they would suit your style and mentality better. Im glad your starting to like the duke. I had an uncle's cbr 600rr for about a week. I still like the duke cause its more fun considering the environments we live in. Happy riding

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Sh4n3W View Post
                        You just can't have everything you want in one bike. Din't you like the cbr 250r? thats more like the cbr 600rr. or the ninja 250r. I feel they would suit your style and mentality better. Im glad your starting to like the duke. I had an uncle's cbr 600rr for about a week. I still like the duke cause its more fun considering the environments we live in. Happy riding
                        Sorry, but i don't think a cbr250r is anything like a cbr600rr. It's a vfr derivative more suited for touring. cbr600rr is a brutal track machine. I did try out the ninja 250, i like it better than the duke but didn't think 3.5L was worth for a stopgap bike (plus i'm not sure what sort of resale value i'd get after a year or so) and it's VERY HEAVY! So, i'm trying to have some fun with my duke now, will get kiiru's ECU map right after my first service, hopefully that will be enough till i fulfill my cbr600 dream.

                        Originally posted by Sh4n3W View Post
                        What do you mean by performance? top speed? acceleration? cornering stability? this is an ownership thread, we know the performance of the duke and dont need the internet to tells us about the performance of the duke. Instead i think you got carried away by the internet so much that you got disappointed in the end due to your high expectations.
                        0-100 acceleration. I didn't get carried away at all, actually. I only had done a test ride before i bought the duke, so i wasn't too familiar with the true performance anyways. I saw so many reviews with sky high praise that i was expecting a major performance boost over, say, a p220. It just isn't there (please don't point me to on paper stats here now)

                        Originally posted by Sh4n3W View Post
                        Softer rides usually end up having comparatively worse cornering performance.
                        You're absolutely right. But the hardness of the ride doesn't quite justify the handling on tap, i personally feel. Will try to play around with the suspension though and find a sweet spot though.

                        Originally posted by Sh4n3W View Post
                        Don't make me laugh man...
                        Not kidding, bro. Both my hands got rashes from it in 2 days of riding (without gloves). And it's not even like i have tender hands. I did get a pair of gloves of day 3 though. Completely fine now.


                        Originally posted by Bplus View Post
                        This can be caused if the chain is not cleaned and lubbed every 500 KM or as and when required, chain tension is not correct,there is a bad chain link,the sliders are not in the right position,chain might be rubbing against the sliders.It dosent matter if the bike is 10 days or 100 days old.
                        It was around 150-200km when it started. MAX.

                        Originally posted by Bplus View Post
                        Yes not a leap as compared to a 600cc you wanted.People review are based on their experience or the bikes they have ridden.
                        Yup. That's why i said that i wasn't even happy (a bit pissed actually) when i made a decision to buy a bike that was not a cbr600rr. It was almost guaranteed that i was going to be disappointed.

                        Originally posted by Bplus View Post
                        Where you not aware about the fuel efficiency before you bought the bike ? Ideally it would give 35 KM /L, if you rip the bike you can expect 30Km/l.It also depends on your riding style.The fuel tank is not leaking it is overflowing because you filled it up to the brim.
                        I knew it beforehand, but the 4-5 liter buffer (both sides combined) pretty much cuts the tank capacity in half. And really, you have to be a mad fanboy to even defend this point.

                        Rest of the things i more or less covered above.

                        To make some of you fanboys happy, i'll say that the mass centralization works absolutely fabulously on the bike. It feels very poised in a straight-line, corners, braking, everything. That's something i appreciate very much. And i do like the rev happy nature of the engine.
                        Bajaj Pulsar 150 : 2004-2005
                        Honda Dio : 2005-2012
                        KTM 200 Duke : 2012-
                        Aprilia RSV4 APRC ABS : 2014-

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by dishayu View Post
                          Sorry, but i don't think a cbr250r is anything like a cbr600rr. It's a vfr derivative more suited for touring. cbr600rr is a brutal track machine. I did try out the ninja 250, i like it better than the duke but didn't think 3.5L was worth for a stopgap bike (plus i'm not sure what sort of resale value i'd get after a year or so) and it's VERY HEAVY!

                          You have to get used to the riding position, steering dynamics, cornering styles of a crotch rocket before directly jumping into a 600rr. The 600rr is forgiving in its low revs. its like max throttling the duke till its around 5k rpms, then shit starts to get wild(in the first gear- which i changed at 98kmph). The other gears are there but i could never push them. And the rr is heavy too. As your first bike the other 250's would be better as the duke 200 wasn't made with the motive of making it a learner bike.


                          0-100 acceleration. I didn't get carried away at all, actually. I only had done a test ride before i bought the duke, so i wasn't too familiar with the true performance anyways. I saw so many reviews with sky high praise that i was expecting a major performance boost over, say, a p220. It just isn't there (please don't point me to on paper stats here now)
                          These reviews aren't catered to you. you should be looking more at european reviews as this is an entry level bike for you but a high performance machine for the masses.

                          Not kidding, bro. Both my hands got rashes from it in 2 days of riding (without gloves). And it's not even like i have tender hands. I did get a pair of gloves of day 3 though. Completely fine now.
                          I get some dead skin below my little finger on my right hand when i don't use gloves. I would advise you to start getting riding gear slowly cause the 600rr won't be as tamed as the duke.

                          Yup. That's why i said that i wasn't even happy (a bit pissed actually) when i made a decision to buy a bike that was not a cbr600rr. It was almost guaranteed that i was going to be disappointed.
                          If you look at the positives, you get to learn to ride better. This link should be helpful Category:Riding Techniques - Ninja250Wiki

                          I knew it beforehand, but the 4-5 liter buffer (both sides combined) pretty much cuts the tank capacity in half. And really, you have to be a mad fanboy to even defend this point.
                          Its around 7 liters. It's pretty decent considering the mileage the bike gives. The 600rr would have you visit the fuel station at a similar frequency.

                          To make some of you fanboys happy, i'll say that the mass centralization works absolutely fabulously on the bike. It feels very poised in a straight-line, corners, braking, everything. That's something i appreciate very much. And i do like the rev happy nature of the engine.
                          Yea... wait till the 350,690,990 and 1290 come

                          Comment


                          • You have to get used to the riding position, steering dynamics, cornering styles of a crotch rocket before directly jumping into a 600rr. The 600rr is forgiving in its low revs. its like max throttling the duke till its around 5k rpms, then shit starts to get wild(in the first gear- which i changed at 98kmph). The other gears are there but i could never push them. And the rr is heavy too. As your first bike the other 250's would be better as the duke 200 wasn't made with the motive of making it a learner bike.
                            You're right. Duke isn't the perfect learners bike. I have had a few track days though, so i think they will have to do as far as "preparing for the big bike" goes. 600rr isn't too heavy. It's just 5kg heavier than Ninja250. And when i said Ninja 250 is heavy, i obviously meant in relation to it's engine/power output. Duke has the perfect power:weight, which is one of the primary reasons i decided in favour of it.

                            These reviews aren't catered to you. you should be looking more at european reviews as this is an entry level bike for you but a high performance machine for the masses.
                            Lesson learnt, i guess :P

                            If you look at the positives, you get to learn to ride better. This link should be helpful Category:Riding Techniques - Ninja250Wiki
                            Thanks for the link. I do take very keen interest in learning to ride better. I've been working upon it for 8 years now (since first day). I do realize that going to a 600cc supersport without learning proper etiquette will just be suicide.

                            Its around 7 liters. It's pretty decent considering the mileage the bike gives. The 600rr would have you visit the fuel station at a similar frequency.]
                            cbr600 is 19 liters. And around half the mileage, give or take. So, yeah, similar frequency. But that is expected of big bikes, not of bikes like the duke

                            Anyways, i think discussing and comparing with a 600rr is completely beyond the point here. This thread is about the duke, so let's keep it at that.
                            Last edited by dishayu; 09-22-2012, 12:24 PM. Reason: quotes gone wrong
                            Bajaj Pulsar 150 : 2004-2005
                            Honda Dio : 2005-2012
                            KTM 200 Duke : 2012-
                            Aprilia RSV4 APRC ABS : 2014-

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by dishayu View Post

                              Not kidding, bro. Both my hands got rashes from it in 2 days of riding (without gloves). And it's not even like i have tender hands. I did get a pair of gloves of day 3 though. Completely fine now.
                              It used to happen with me too, but it is not a rash actually.And for what ever reason I live the grips now

                              I knew it beforehand, but the 4-5 liter buffer (both sides combined) pretty much cuts the tank capacity in half. And really, you have to be a mad fanboy to even defend this point.
                              What do you mean by a 4-5 liter buffer ? Can you explain technically the necessity for the buffer with reference to a reliable source.I have ridden the bike for over 30 KM with less than 2 L in the tank - no problem.The reason I defend is because you are just being a show off and overly exaggerating a review to a point that it is misleading..
                              ..
                              reply in bold
                              Last edited by Bplus; 09-22-2012, 12:38 PM.

                              Comment


                              • What do you mean by a 4-5 liter buffer ? Can you explain technically the necessity for the buffer with reference to a reliable source.I have ridden the bike for over 30 KM with less than 2 L in the tank - no problem.The reason I defend is because you are just being a show off and overly exaggerating a review to a point that it is misleading..
                                Eh? It's plastered all over xbhp (and internet in general) that FI engine should never be used with less than 2-3 liter of fuel (different people say different things) to not screw with the fuel pump. And i do not know how technically correct it is but i don't want to be the one to test it out. And since i have a shell fuel pump on my daily route, i fill up as soon as i get under 4 bars of fuel. And the KTM dealer said never fill more than 9 liters (so, 1.5 buffer gone there). So, i'm not really exaggerating here. And please explain to me which part did i "show off" in? Plus you have no say if i'm exaggerating or not in MY REVIEW. My review means how "I" percieve it. If you think it's exaggerated or not is your business but don't present it as a fact, please.
                                Last edited by dishayu; 09-22-2012, 12:53 PM.
                                Bajaj Pulsar 150 : 2004-2005
                                Honda Dio : 2005-2012
                                KTM 200 Duke : 2012-
                                Aprilia RSV4 APRC ABS : 2014-

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X