Since '02 xBhp is different things to different people. From a close knit national community of
bikers to India's only motorcycling lifestyle magazine and a place to make like-minded biker
friends. Join us
If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Today took the bike to service. Found out that there was air bubbles in it due to which i had rock hard suspension travel.
They just removed the top made the fork flex a bit and refitted the top bolt. Now the bike is back to being awesome
Excellent. Improper bleeding when oil filling. Thanks for sharing the results as well.
Cheers!
VJ
Once upon a time, a guy asked a girl 'Will you marry me?'
The girl said, 'NO!'
And the guy lived happily ever after and rode motorcycles and watched sport on a big screen TV, went fishing and surfing, and played golf a lot, and drank beer and scotch and had tons of money in the bank and left the toilet seat up and farted whenever he wanted.
Finally some real tyre talks. I was about to take my D200 to Leh next month and my tyres are at their fina stages. I didn't want to spend costly rubbers on the Himalayan terrain.
So against all speculations I went ahead and bought the Bazooka 150/60 andhas the exact specs as the stock MRF. Has got the logos ofboth Continental and Metro. The tyres costed me Rs.2850
For the front wheel, I am thinking of going for TVS ProtorQ which is again a radial tyre from TVS which is 110/70. But any suggestion would be most welcome.
Most people advice me against my choice of rubbers. But again at the end of the day, there is no point shelling out 10k for Michellin and riding it over the Leh terrain. Bazookas seems to be sturdy and I am yet to fit it on my bike. But I am attaching some of the images.
Give them a try , the bazookas. Otherwise a safe bet would be the conti go or the ceat (zoom xl) in the 140 section.. cheaper and last longer and better puncture resistant.. though grip will not be as good as the mrf revz.
How much does the metro bazooka cost?
I got the Bazooka for ₹2850. Looks sturdy. But the performance is yet to be seen. Will be installing it in another 2 or 3 days once I decide my front rubber.
Finally some real tyre talks. I was about to take my D200 to Leh next month and my tyres are at their fina stages. I didn't want to spend costly rubbers on the Himalayan terrain.
So against all speculations I went ahead and bought the Bazooka 150/60 andhas the exact specs as the stock MRF. Has got the logos ofboth Continental and Metro. The tyres costed me Rs.2850
For the front wheel, I am thinking of going for TVS ProtorQ which is again a radial tyre from TVS which is 110/70. But any suggestion would be most welcome.
Most people advice me against my choice of rubbers. But again at the end of the day, there is no point shelling out 10k for Michellin and riding it over the Leh terrain. Bazookas seems to be sturdy and I am yet to fit it on my bike. But I am attaching some of the images.
I have ceat for my front. Don't remember the model, a bit tough then stock MRF but the riding experience is not that great. I think you better take suggestions or check the experience for bazooka and then decide on front tyre since you are planning Leh
P.S. DO NOT quote the entire picture set. Remove all pics before quoting posts with pictures.
I got the Bazooka for ₹2850. Looks sturdy. But the performance is yet to be seen. Will be installing it in another 2 or 3 days once I decide my front rubber.
for the front, stick to the mrf revz fc or fc1. best tire your money can buy.
I have ceat for my front. Don't remember the model, a bit tough then stock MRF but the riding experience is not that great. I think you better take suggestions or check the experience for bazooka and then decide on front tyre since you are planning Leh
Thanks for the heads up. So no CEAT for me then. I also guess that CEAT aren't radial.
for the front, stick to the mrf revz fc or fc1. best tire your money can buy.
I never had issue with my stock Revz. So I would stick with Revz. If I am not going for leh I would have gone for Michelin. But I dőńt want to take the fresh costly rubbers over the rough terrain up there. That's why I have been looking for cost effective alternatives.
But the only issue with mrf is that they seem to be a bit puncture prone. But however I guess I dőńt have Mich choice than Revz.
Thank you.
I never had issue with my stock Revz. So I would stick with Revz. If I am not going for leh I would have gone for Michelin. But I dőńt want to take the fresh costly rubbers over the rough terrain up there. That's why I have been looking for cost effective alternatives.
But the only issue with mrf is that they seem to be a bit puncture prone. But however I guess I dőńt have Mich choice than Revz.
Thank you.
I always thought Michelin are comparatively harder than stock MRFs. Also cost wise they are more. I feel MRF should suffice for the front though. As it has acceptable grip and priced appropriately.
[QUOTE=kundalus;1302844]I always thought Michelin are comparatively harder than stock MRFs. Also cost wise they are more./QUOTE]
Yes correct. They are harder and cost more, last longer. They take a bit of time to warm up before providing optimum grip. Main Upside of michelins are they being more resistant against knicks and punctures.
Comment