Since '02 xBhp is different things to different people. From a close knit national community of bikers to India's only motorcycling lifestyle magazine and a place to make like-minded biker friends. Join us

Castrol Power 1

Always wear a helmet.

Our Partner

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Honda CBR 250R

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Chain friction plate kaput!

    Hi guys,

    I am writing from Rajkot. xBhp Ahmedabad was having its mega G2G today and I had planned to attend it.

    I started at 0700h from home. It was cool weather and I made it to Darshan dhaba by 0800h when I heard a slight thud from underneath the bike and towards the left side. I stopped immediately and checked the bike thoroughly but nothing was amiss. Thinking that it must have been some small stone hitting the cowl, I started off again.

    Now, I heard the chain slapping the swing arm, something which was totally new in my experience with the CBR. Again, I stopped immediately and checked the chain. To my horror, I found that the rubber friction plate had torn off and was stuck between the damper's side and the swing arm's right arm. I took it off and found that the swing arm itself had been abraded by the chain . That was the end of my trip to Ahmedabad for the G2G.

    Nursed the bike back to Rajkot and inspected it really properly. There was a fair amount of wear on two sections of the swing arm, though not so bad as to warrant a complete replacement.

    The bike had just returned from a service and I am suspecting that the mechanic must have fingered this part while adjusting the chain (he had already reset the position of the gear lever without being asked to do so). Will take it to Dharti Honda first thing tommorrow.

    This is an odd problem, I wonder if any of us in the owner's thread have had it.

    Here are the pics:



    The small lip ahead of the serrated portion is the actual plate surface, the serration has been caused by the chain abrading the rubber. Very, very strange..


    SAFETY ALERT If the friction plate comes off, THE CHAIN WILL GRIND AGAINST THE SWING ARM PROPERLY. The gap between the chain and the swing arm minus the plate is NOT ENOUGH to give clearance to free chain movement. Seems a case of a slightly bad design to me...
    Last edited by icemang; 04-08-2012, 06:45 PM. Reason: Typo

    Comment


    • Originally posted by chicmagnet View Post
      @hotspot.vipin - it totally depends on what speeds you will be doing the 50 kms stretch.
      in my case (I too do around 54kms daily), if my bike is at 90+ I get mileage of 32 but on the same stretch if my average speeds are even below 50 owing to traffic, my mileage goes down to 28 and sometimes even to 25!
      On a 10ltr fill, I have done anywhere between 210 - 332 kms for those 10 ltrs on the same stretch of tarmac! Totally depends on the speed of the bike and how relax ur riding is. Traffic means less mileage for the CBR
      well imho 25-30 when driven in traffic is like too less. we can't expect open roads all the time and this thing seems like a dealbreaker. At 25-30kmpl it makes me feel that its not a ninja or some super(duper)bike that on ecan live with such low mileage. My friend just got a R15 v2 which is giving him above 45 when driving sanely and sumthing aroun 45 when we rip to the full

      Originally posted by aman15 View Post
      hi guys i m a newbiee .. Nd i m happy to join xbhp.. My bike is just 3months old ... My bikes average is 42 kpl ... But the facts are
      1. I rided it only on highway (NH - 4)
      2.shifted the gear after 3.5Rpm only
      3.avg speed was 75km/h in sixth gear.
      4. Done only 20kms in the city.
      5. USED SHELL companys OIL
      ... And i have used bharat petroleum oil the avg was 32 and HP avg was 37... Hope this will help u
      42 kmpl is great for a bike like that but one will not buy a CBR to drive it at such slow speeds that can be done on any other commuter. i own an r15 and i never change my gears unless it screams 4 it,.,.,.still it delivers a descent 38-40kmpl
      _____________________________________________
      want something new in my stable,.,.,d pulsar doesn't feed to my need for speed,.,.,.,
      SOMETHING FAIRED
      yamaha r15 (2010) - not riding it now
      pulsar 150 (2006)
      yamaha rx100 (1993)<<still kicks a#$>>

      Comment


      • 42 kmpl is great for a bike like that but one will not buy a CBR to drive it at such slow speeds that can be done on any other commuter. i own an r15 and i never change my gears unless it screams 4 it,.,.,.still it delivers a descent 38-40kmpl[/QUOTE]

        I knw its bit too slow but i have started to learn riding on this very bike about 3months ago its fast for me atleast ... Also achvd ovr 100 few times when there was no traffic...
        I respect the threat.
        ~ Kamlesh Kanda V2.0

        Comment


        • Originally posted by hotshot.vipin View Post
          well imho 25-30 when driven in traffic is like too less. we can't expect open roads all the time and this thing seems like a dealbreaker. At 25-30kmpl it makes me feel that its not a ninja or some super(duper)bike that on ecan live with such low mileage. My friend just got a R15 v2 which is giving him above 45 when driving sanely and sumthing aroun 45 when we rip to the full


          42 kmpl is great for a bike like that but one will not buy a CBR to drive it at such slow speeds that can be done on any other commuter. i own an r15 and i never change my gears unless it screams 4 it,.,.,.still it delivers a descent 38-40kmpl
          just get the r15v2 already dude.u know its what u want .go for the special edition.looks fantastic on road.
          ๔ยкє ҭђгєє ภเภєҭұ เภ ๓ұ שєเภร

          Comment


          • Originally posted by senotrius View Post
            just get the r15v2 already dude.u know its what u want .go for the special edition.looks fantastic on road.
            well bro u just got me,.,.,i seriouly love the v2 but the only thing wich wants me to go to something else is that i want something bigger (or maybe not)
            i am just confused,.,.,i want a new bikethat performs well, is faired and not veryyyyy heavy on the pocket in terms of running cost

            and i dont see some other bike launching soon dat fulfillz these criteria,.,.,so i just have the v2 and cbr to consider
            _____________________________________________
            want something new in my stable,.,.,d pulsar doesn't feed to my need for speed,.,.,.,
            SOMETHING FAIRED
            yamaha r15 (2010) - not riding it now
            pulsar 150 (2006)
            yamaha rx100 (1993)<<still kicks a#$>>

            Comment


            • Originally posted by hotshot.vipin View Post
              well dat was kind of rude,.,.,.i am not deciding upon the bikes solely due to mileage but mileage also becomes a big issue seeing the current fuel prices
              Sorry, My intention was not to sound rude about it. But yes, it did come off as rude.
              In any case I think you conformed to my thinking This is definitely not a budget bike.
              As bikes become more powerful, they wear out parts like Tyres, pads, chains faster. So expect running costs to be a bit more than R15.
              I guess R15 v2 would suit your needs. Also, you'd be disappointed with CBR's handling since it wont be as sharp as R15 is. What Ceeber does best is 120 on highway all day long, with some grunt to spare for overtaking.
              Last edited by allajunaki; 04-08-2012, 09:25 PM.
              CBR250R Black 'n' Silver

              Comment


              • whatever your thingking may be I DONT CARE much about that.
                but i am more interested in getting my doubts cleared so that i can make a clear decision that i don't regret in the future.
                _____________________________________________
                want something new in my stable,.,.,d pulsar doesn't feed to my need for speed,.,.,.,
                SOMETHING FAIRED
                yamaha r15 (2010) - not riding it now
                pulsar 150 (2006)
                yamaha rx100 (1993)<<still kicks a#$>>

                Comment


                • Originally posted by hotshot.vipin View Post
                  whatever your thingking may be I DONT CARE much about that.
                  but i am more interested in getting my doubts cleared so that i can make a clear decision that i don't regret in the future.
                  Better go for KTM instead ... Very great pickup (better than my cbr ..) very easy to ride .great handling .bikes avg will be good too and u wont regret since its 200cc...
                  Last edited by aman15; 04-08-2012, 09:55 PM.
                  I respect the threat.
                  ~ Kamlesh Kanda V2.0

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by hotshot.vipin View Post
                    whatever your thingking may be I DONT CARE much about that.
                    but i am more interested in getting my doubts cleared so that i can make a clear decision that i don't regret in the future.
                    Alright.. All the best with your decision. Good luck. But if you are not interested in the thinking of CBR owners, then ownership thread of CBR is not the place to ask.
                    Actually your questions should be in "What Bike" Section not here.

                    In any case, I'm sorry I wasted your time. Have fun with whatever you get.


                    @Aman - He did say something "faired". Duke is street naked. Any case, Duke is a great package. And the engine is very spunky.
                    Last edited by allajunaki; 04-08-2012, 10:16 PM.
                    CBR250R Black 'n' Silver

                    Comment


                    • @Aman15: Just clear to your doubt, I'll keep it short and simple since this is a CBR ownership thread. KTM is not quicker than the CBR, it only has a very slightly better roll on times, that's it. KTM is short geared and hence it gives an impression that it accelerates quicker. But, due to it's short gearing, the KTM takes more gear shifts than the CBR to achieve similar speeds. I'll put an example from the Bike India's april issue. It mentions that CBR achieves 0 to 100 kph in 3rd gear while it takes 5 gears for the KTM to do the same. Owners can confirm the same.
                      The Chronicles of Motorcycling - The Man, The Machine and The Road

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by hotshot.vipin View Post
                        well bro u just got me,.,.,i seriouly love the v2 but the only thing wich wants me to go to something else is that i want something bigger (or maybe not)
                        i am just confused,.,.,i want a new bikethat performs well, is faired and not veryyyyy heavy on the pocket in terms of running cost

                        and i dont see some other bike launching soon dat fulfillz these criteria,.,.,so i just have the v2 and cbr to consider
                        Bro both mileage and performance are the opposite sides of a coin. From your posts I think R15 suits you best, it has got good mileage than CBR250R AFAIK and more nimble also. As Duke200 is out of your list, R15 is the best bet. I am getting 28-30 in city traffic and 33-35 in highways or may be a lil more and please don't compare R15 with CBR250 as its of different character and different purpose. If you are not into touring CBR is not for you. Still you are in doubt take a good long TD of both bikes at places where you usually rides else post a thread in "What Bike" section where you will get better suggestions and please keep the ownership thread clean.
                        Good Luck...
                        sigpic...Ride Long...Ride Safe...

                        When you dance with the devil, you wait for the song to stop...

                        Comment


                        • http://www.xbhp.com/talkies/newreply.php?do=newreply&amp;p=797217

                          Originally posted by senotrius View Post
                          just get the r15v2 already dude.u know its what u want .go for the special edition.looks fantastic on road.
                          Originally posted by aman15 View Post
                          Better go for KTM instead ... Very great pickup (better than my cbr ..) very easy to ride .great handling .bikes avg will be good too and u wont regret since its 200cc...
                          i am not interested in a naked bike bro

                          Originally posted by allajunaki View Post
                          Alright.. All the best with your decision. Good luck. But if you are not interested in the thinking of CBR owners, then ownership thread of CBR is not the place to ask.
                          Actually your questions should be in "What Bike" Section not here.

                          In any case, I'm sorry I wasted your time. Have fun with whatever you get.
                          hey,.,.
                          i didn't mean to offend you but was jus hurt with that comment of yours.
                          i guess the main question thus is that is the CBR so supereor compared to R15 that as you mentioned pads, chain and all that stuff wears out faster( as according to others in this thread it was due to inferior quality of parts )
                          _____________________________________________
                          want something new in my stable,.,.,d pulsar doesn't feed to my need for speed,.,.,.,
                          SOMETHING FAIRED
                          yamaha r15 (2010) - not riding it now
                          pulsar 150 (2006)
                          yamaha rx100 (1993)<<still kicks a#$>>

                          Comment


                          • Normally which oil do u all use for better fe and performance of the machine have anyone used it
                            Bp- speed
                            Hp- power
                            How is indian oils xtra premium
                            have u guys used it.
                            Last edited by arjunb25; 04-09-2012, 02:54 AM.
                            click me
                            FACEBOOK

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by hotshot.vipin View Post
                              whatever your thingking may be I DONT CARE much about that.
                              but i am more interested in getting my doubts cleared so that i can make a clear decision that i don't regret in the future.
                              Originally posted by Satellite.kid View Post
                              @Aman15: Just clear to your doubt, I'll keep it short and simple since this is a CBR ownership thread. KTM is not quicker than the CBR, it only has a very slightly better roll on times, that's it. KTM is short geared and hence it gives an impression that it accelerates quicker. But, due to it's short gearing, the KTM takes more gear shifts than the CBR to achieve similar speeds. I'll put an example from the Bike India's april issue. It mentions that CBR achieves 0 to 100 kph in 3rd gear while it takes 5 gears for the KTM to do the same. Owners can confirm the same.
                              Thnx for the info i didnt knw that
                              I respect the threat.
                              ~ Kamlesh Kanda V2.0

                              Comment


                              • i just love this bike ... awesome ride!!!!

                                Four wheels move the body. Two wheels move the soul. ;)

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X